Are Tufo S3s really this bad?

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Post Reply
cheapvega
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:12 pm

by cheapvega

I had Tufo S3 tubulars on 38mm wheels (all 25mm width) for my build as it was all light and cheap. On my benchmark punchy 14 mile ride my all out best time was about 50 minutes. That was at peak fitness. Today I did my first ride on 28mm GP5Ks with 60mm ELITEWHEELS clinchers. Similar temp, winds, avg HR & normalized power. I smashed it in 47:48. The whole ride I was saying "I can't believe this"... "are you kidding me" etc. Avg speed was only .7 higher, but I swear there were several places where I was 2-4 MPH faster.

I'm sure the deeper wheels helped, but I feel like the tires did the heavy lifting. Is there really that big of a gap from the Tufos to the GP5Ks? The speed was incredible.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
spokenwords
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:21 am

by spokenwords

yes, Tufo's are pretty bad. Like riding garden hoses.
"Notice how the door closes when the chimes of freedom ring." Joe Strummer
"this goes to 11" Nigel Tufnel
Dont move to Austin
Major Taylor rules.

Mocs123
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 9:19 pm

by Mocs123

I'm not sure about the Tufo's but going from a slow tire to a fast tire like GP5K's could mean 20 watts of rolling resistance and that is huge. IMO - Going for minimal rolling resistance is always faster than going lightweight when it comes to tires.
2015 Wilier Zero.7 Rim - 6.37kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg

tiz92
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 3:36 pm

by tiz92

you can save also 15-20w from the badest rolling resistance to the fastest. I dont know about the tufos but if you are similar in fitness and doesnt lack in 50w then it is very possible. There are lot of optimisations (and also relatively cheap) you can do to safe watts on the bike.

milanv
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:03 am

by milanv

cheapvega wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:34 am
I had Tufo S3 tubulars on 38mm wheels (all 25mm width) for my build as it was all light and cheap. On my benchmark punchy 14 mile ride my all out best time was about 50 minutes. That was at peak fitness. Today I did my first ride on 28mm GP5Ks with 60mm ELITEWHEELS clinchers. Similar temp, winds, avg HR & normalized power. I smashed it in 47:48. The whole ride I was saying "I can't believe this"... "are you kidding me" etc. Avg speed was only .7 higher, but I swear there were several places where I was 2-4 MPH faster.

I'm sure the deeper wheels helped, but I feel like the tires did the heavy lifting. Is there really that big of a gap from the Tufos to the GP5Ks? The speed was incredible.
First of all, deeper wheels helped you in rolling parts, the main difference.

cheapvega
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:12 pm

by cheapvega

I am continually blown away by this new setup. Yesterday I did hill sprints. 1.8 mile loop with 200ft of climbing on the up leg. On the old setup a good lap was something in the high 6 minute range. New setup, similar average power, I cracked into the 5s no problem. Average speed over the workout jumped from 16 MPH to 18 MPH. I just couldn't believe it.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply