Open MIN.D. California - The spiritual sequel to Cervelo R5CA & RCA

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12582
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

bobones wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:54 am
TobinHatesYou wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:02 am
Name a lighter endurance bike.
Raw carbon TCR Advanced SL disc is 765g. Run with 15mm of spacers to make it an "endurance" bike. Pocket €5k.

Gosh, then why doesn't eveyone just buy race bikes? Everyone should buy H1 geometry Treks and use 4cm in spacers.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



bobones
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:19 am

by bobones

TobinHatesYou wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:20 am
bobones wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:54 am
TobinHatesYou wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:02 am
Name a lighter endurance bike.
Raw carbon TCR Advanced SL disc is 765g. Run with 15mm of spacers to make it an "endurance" bike. Pocket €5k.

Gosh, then why doesn't eveyone just buy race bikes? Everyone should buy H1 geometry Treks and use 4cm in spacers.
If a "race" bike is €5k cheaper and effectively has same geometry as "endurance" bike with some spacers, then why not?

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12582
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

bobones wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:27 am

If a "race" bike is €5k cheaper and effectively has same geometry as "endurance" bike with some spacers, then why not?

Because that means it's not the same geometry. Someone who already has 1.5cm in spacers on an endurance bike would then need more like 3cm on a race bike.

Likewise you can't just tell everyone to use a -17deg stem on an endurance bike to get a racier fit. Some of us already have slammed -17deg stems on our race bikes.

bobones
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:19 am

by bobones

In edge cases it may not be viable, but for many the difference between an endurance and race geometry is just a few spacers or negative angled stem.

Anyway, the TCR example is mainly to highlight the poor VFM of this frameset. They're taking the p*ss IMO.

alanyu
Posts: 1545
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 1:10 pm

by alanyu

bobones wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 8:03 am
In edge cases it may not be viable, but for many the difference between an endurance and race geometry is just a few spacers or negative angled stem.
Endurance bike usually has a longer chainstay and a higher trail, and a more compliance rear triangle, which is a different riding quality. (stablitiy vs agilement, comfort vs stiffness, etc.) E.g. TCR vs Defy

A same dailed-in geometry (keeping the same effective reach, stack, saddle position) can not reproduce everthing racing vs. endurance.

Karvalo
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2018 6:40 pm

by Karvalo

bobones wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:27 am
TobinHatesYou wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:20 am
bobones wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:54 am
TobinHatesYou wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:02 am
Name a lighter endurance bike.
Raw carbon TCR Advanced SL disc is 765g. Run with 15mm of spacers to make it an "endurance" bike. Pocket €5k.

Gosh, then why doesn't eveyone just buy race bikes? Everyone should buy H1 geometry Treks and use 4cm in spacers.
If a "race" bike is €5k cheaper and effectively has same geometry as "endurance" bike with some spacers, then why not?
This is such a great point because I have noticed that everyone rides endurance bikes slammed oh wait no.

eric01
Posts: 910
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:06 am

by eric01

I read the web site. “75 grams lighter yet stiffer in all directions except in the continuous seattube (where it actually provides even more flex than the original MIN.D. This combination makes the ride something very special.”

Okay so i retract my previous “it’s just lack of paint” statement.

Still it’s a steep upcharge to go from 3700 usd to 7500 usd for the California version. It’s a crazy bike market now… why not? Can’t blame them.
Specialized Tarmac Sworks SL6, Moots Compact, Carl Strong Titanium

flow
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:45 am

by flow

At first I thought shit I bought my mind 6 weeks ago…but 4K for 90g is a bad deal. I did a custom saddle mount instead of the ritchey stubby which saved me 70g. The Paint on my frame has about 25g


Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk

flow
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:45 am

by flow

At first I thought i bought my mind 6 weeks ago to early…but 4K for 90g is a bad deal. I did a custom saddle mount instead of the ritchey stubby which saved me 70g. The Paint on my frame has about 25g


Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk

trainergav
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:36 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC

by trainergav

bobones wrote:
Thu Mar 10, 2022 1:05 pm
I'll just take a TCR Advanced SL frameset and pocket the €5k change, thank you very much. :roll:
I'm not sure why people have to keep on bringing up Giant's whenever they want to say that another bike is overpriced. If cost was the only factor in a bike purchase we'd all be riding Giant whatever's or some open mold bike. Giants are clearly great value for the money but the person who into their bikes is usually not the same person who is into Open's.

I am not interested in the MIND, but have an U.P. and it's a sweet bike and love what Gerard and Andy have done with their brand.

romanmoser
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 8:30 pm

by romanmoser

me too , except their voids in chainstays,

Clean39T
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:29 am

by Clean39T

flow wrote:At first I thought shit I bought my mind 6 weeks ago…but 4K for 90g is a bad deal. I did a custom saddle mount instead of the ritchey stubby which saved me 70g. The Paint on my frame has about 25g


Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk
Any info you can share on that custom saddle mount?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

markdjr
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:21 pm

by markdjr

When they first announced the California, I was also disappointed they didn't go for lighter weight, especially considering the response the Aethos has received. I got to go on a short ride on the California recently and I was surprised by how good it felt. It really did feel more comfortable and stiffer than the standard MIND. Whether or not it's worth the premium price is an individual question.

romanmoser
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 8:30 pm

by romanmoser

Lol did you guys gals saw the photos of actual open mind california ?
What a *f##k* poor quality , wrinkles everywhere, bb area very nasty and oval to the eyes
Will link some pictures

It is appealing

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



maquisard
Posts: 3795
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: France

by maquisard

The reality is the tape laying robot that lays down the layup schedule for a Specialized Aethos does a better job than a human 'expert' doing it in an artisan lab in California

Post Reply