New Schwalbe Aerothan Tubes - a Tubolito competitor?

Wheels, Tires, Tubes, Tubeless, Tubs, Spokes, Hookless, Hubs, and more!

Moderator: robbosmans

Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.

If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
Rnoben
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2021 2:18 pm
Contact:

by Rnoben

Replaced extra light butyl tubes with Aerothans on 1 bike in October and really like them.
I initially bought them to save some rotating weight, and do have the feeling that the bike accelerates faster.
However, for me the biggest difference is the amount of comfort the tubes offer (running them with 25mm gp5000 tires). It really feels like I'm riding a different bike!
So far no problems/flats (knock on wood).
So for me one of the best upgrades I have ever done.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Yoln
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:26 pm

by Yoln

maxim809 wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:50 am
Yes good approach. Everyone should experience and come to their own conclusions.

Also, I'm still willing to give it more go's. I'm n=1, with only n=2 punctures. My next 10 could be a series of winning streaks. I'm still open minded to the notion that there could be some obvious user error on my part. Though, patching a tube should be pretty straightforward...

Sealing issues aside, they ride real nice.
Yeah. I know it's difficult to answer, but when you say "tiny needle", do you feel like you would have avoided the puncture using butyl?
Litespeed Gravel Ultimate : https://tinyurl.com/zvxxy8zk
Wilier “Cento Ramato“ : https://tinyurl.com/29vs8vre
#RETIRED# Lynskey “the Do-it-all Helix” 🧬:https://tinyurl.com/bdmb5y24

Keykey1985
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 9:15 am

by Keykey1985

Yoln wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:24 pm
maxim809 wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:50 am
Yes good approach. Everyone should experience and come to their own conclusions.

Also, I'm still willing to give it more go's. I'm n=1, with only n=2 punctures. My next 10 could be a series of winning streaks. I'm still open minded to the notion that there could be some obvious user error on my part. Though, patching a tube should be pretty straightforward...

Sealing issues aside, they ride real nice.
Yeah. I know it's difficult to answer, but when you say "tiny needle", do you feel like you would have avoided the puncture using butyl?
I was under the impression that these were more resistant to punctures than butyl tubes, when I got a puncture I queried this with Schwalbe when asking them about the best way to patch a puncture. Their response was 'A thorn which is strong enough to get through a tyre will probably still cause a puncture'.

With that in mind I can't see how these can be any more resistant to punctures than a butyl tube. I feel a little bit cheated in that respect, especially when you consider I'm using the race endurance version in a 30mm tyre so not pushing the tube anywhere near to it's limits.

usr
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:58 pm

by usr

I believe that Latex survives some foreign object intrusion incidents that butyl doesn't survive by just giving in more than butyl before rupturing. If the object is removed quick enough (e.g. a thorn still connected to the carrier shrub) so that it doesn't have hundreds of wheel revolutions to work against the material, the object will just poke into the toroid for a short while, temporarily altering its shape, but not breaking the surface.

I've had an amazing low puncture experience with latex, and after consulting the Schwalbe advertising materials for Aerothan that's my explanation for that experience. The advertising graphic regarding puncture resistance has two metrics, force until puncture and insertion depth until puncture. For butyl and "orange plastic competitor", the force results are quite consistent with the ones Tubolito uses to advertise their tube: Tubolito only has "force until puncture" (where Tubolito is good) on their site and their performance relative to butyl references is very similar to what Schwalbe is claiming for their "orange competitor". But the Schwalbe claims also have the "intrusion depth" metric where Latex dominates the other competitors. Tied with Aerothan, but that's certainly more susceptible to bias than the relative strengths amongst competitors. My puncture experience with Tubolito was rather bad, particularly when compared to latex, so I consider the "depth" metric (where according to Aerothan ads Latex is very good) far more important than the "force" metric (where Aerothan ads claim that Tubolito was already much better than anything before).

Do I trust the Aerothan ads about their own performance? Not really, but the consistence of of Schwalbe and Tubolito claims about relative performance between Tubolito and butyl in the "force" metric was enough for me to give Aerothan a chance. I gave up on Tubolito about a year earlier, at tube number ten or so. Still far from having gone the miles to give Aerothan a thumbs up, but a tactile comparison between the two plastics at least gave me the impression that their claim of higher similarity to latex than "the page one" might very well have some truth in it: on a tactile scale from "rubbery" to "somewhat bendable plastics", Aerothan feels closer to rubbery than Tubolito.

maxim809
Administrator
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:28 am

by maxim809

Glad to hear others are having the same ride quality feel as me. It's like riding on a comfy couch, in a good way.

Regarding would I have punctured on Butyl?

Given the needle I pulled out and how it was embedded, absolutely. It was a super thin brush-like metallic thorn, penetrating deep through the tire. I wager every materials, TPU, Butyl, and Latex would have blown. Only tubeless could have hoped to survive (to those watching from the church of tubeless, I know, I know -- let's keep that debate out of this, LOL... I'm a fan of tubeless too).

IME, latex is the best at puncture resistance but ONLY for the scenario where a glass shard sits in the tire and barely penetrates through the skin of the tire. I've been amazed at how I can ride for ~50 miles with a shard embedded like that in the rear tire. I can flick the shard out with a fingernail, and see the latex tube through the tire walls right before they close up.

Hard to see the same happening with TPU, but I'll report back if I have that 'perfect' glass shard scenario and it holds up.

Yoln
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:26 pm

by Yoln

maxim809 wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:33 pm
Glad to hear others are having the same ride quality feel as me. It's like riding on a comfy couch, in a good way.

Regarding would I have punctured on Butyl?

Given the needle I pulled out and how it was embedded, absolutely. It was a super thin brush-like metallic thorn, penetrating deep through the tire. I wager every materials, TPU, Butyl, and Latex would have blown. Only tubeless could have hoped to survive (to those watching from the church of tubeless, I know, I know -- let's keep that debate out of this, LOL... I'm a fan of tubeless too).

IME, latex is the best at puncture resistance but ONLY for the scenario where a glass shard sits in the tire and barely penetrates through the skin of the tire. I've been amazed at how I can ride for ~50 miles with a shard embedded like that in the rear tire. I can flick the shard out with a fingernail, and see the latex tube through the tire walls right before they close up.

Hard to see the same happening with TPU, but I'll report back if I have that 'perfect' glass shard scenario and it holds up.
Better ride feel than latex you'd say?
Litespeed Gravel Ultimate : https://tinyurl.com/zvxxy8zk
Wilier “Cento Ramato“ : https://tinyurl.com/29vs8vre
#RETIRED# Lynskey “the Do-it-all Helix” 🧬:https://tinyurl.com/bdmb5y24

maxim809
Administrator
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:28 am

by maxim809

Equivalent. :D

Way better than Butyl.

LOWIEV
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:03 pm

by LOWIEV

This might be a stupid question, but i'll ask it anyway.
Aerothan Race (for <28 mm tires) seems to be sold out in my go to online shops. They do still have the endurance version (for 28 mm tires and more).
I use sworks 26mm tires.
Would this be ok to use the endurance version with 26mm tires?

tomtom
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:01 am

by tomtom

maxim809 wrote:
Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:14 pm
Equivalent. :D

Way better than Butyl.
I noticed the same; much better ride quality but also had three(!) punctures in the last 1000km where I had almost none in the 10.000km before with butyl (and liquid latex). Combining with liquid latex & Aerothan is not(!) possible; it soldifies :-(. Patching also seems impossible. I did not succeed with Schwalbe & Leyzyne patches. Did anyone have more luck?
Canyon Aeroad CFR
Canyon Grail CF

usr
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:58 pm

by usr

Bad Aerothan day today: noticed pressure loss on the rear wheel few minutes into the ride, then spent an hour repeatedly falling at achieving anything close to rideable pressure before stem thread failure (using "inboard valve" extensions). I strongly suspect that the initial flat was already a valve thread failure, caused by the pump hose on an angled chuck.

They should just mold that weird black "foot" onto an ultra short metal stem (like 10mm or so, with some corners/notches/crenellations for torque stability) that serves only as a base for extension even with the shallowest of rims. And call it a feature, lighter and more compact spare tubes.

Update: turns out it was a puncture. Time for the patchperiment! Lucky that it happened in walking distance when all spares fail. (and the time spent with my rear wheel made me discover an easily fixable issue with the EDCO cassette that hopefully solves a boatload of recent noise issues)

Post Reply