C36 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 3:47 pm
robeambro wrote:
There's roughly 0.003 CdA difference vs the Tarmac, which equates to between 3-4 watts @ 45km/h..
On my own post I probably miss judged the 0.007 difference but clearly more in the 0.005 / 0.006 range than the 0.003.
The SSe3 will be below the 0.0075 weighted with yaw angles and the SL6 above the 0.008... now still have doubts on the configurations being compared. If done with aero cockpit on the sl6, that would be absolutely remarkable... if done with std bars... that still a great performance.
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
Please excuse my horrible Snipping Tool skills on a Touch Pad. I am ashamed ay myself for publishing this.
Anyway, if those three dots on the y-axis represent 0.007, 0.0075 and 0.008, to me it seems that at most yaw angles, the difference vs the SL6 is more around .0003 to .0004...
Of course we could wait for the whitepaper, but why do that if I can publish some embarassingly ugly analysis
Oh and, I'm also a bit unsure as to the Tarmac tested, the very asymmetrical CdA profile seems to suggest they tested it w/ discs, but the SS Evo seems to be very strangely symmetrical in comparison.