Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:43 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 28331 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1963 964 965 966 9671889 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:23 am
Posts: 643
Location: Melbourne, Australia
euan wrote:
Disc covers aren't allowed by the UCI

But the HED Stinger disc is UCI legal, but it is a spoked wheel with a permanently bonded cover. I assume this Vision disc is utilising the same construction.

_________________
Slam your stem.


Top
   
 
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:24 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7900
Location: San Francisco, CA
Nibali position updated by Specialized:

For animation, I matched pad position.
"Nibali's bars were raised so he could try to relax his shoulders and drop his head"

Image

Did photos get swapped?

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:41 pm
Posts: 245
Location: Shetland, Scotland
euan wrote:
Disc covers aren't allowed by the UCI

Are we clear which specific UCI reg stop wheel covers?
I know they have usually not been allowed to be used, but they'd seem to pass the first level regs at least - 3:1 doesn't apply to wheels, TT wheels don't need to pass a rupture test, and fairings are allowed where a credit card can pass between the shielded part (wheel in this case) and the other part (frame)?


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7900
Location: San Francisco, CA
All components must be structural, not specifically to aid aerodynamics. Same rule which prevents fairings.
USA Cycling specifically allowed them, viewing it as an economic fairness issue, although most fatty masters end up buying full disks anyway, even if they're no better.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:45 pm
Posts: 201
pastronef wrote:
erty65 wrote:
ave wrote:
I know it's nothing new, but these bars seems extremely narrow for Hansen's size.What I don't really know is what's the benefit?
More comfortable with a narrow bar.


that should be a 40 cm c/c
or maybe even 38?
Maybe!


Top
   
 
 Post subject: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 1672
ave wrote:
I know it's nothing new, but these bars seems extremely narrow for Hansen's size.

What I don't really know is what's the benefit?


Placebo effect...

_________________
"It never gets easier, you just go faster..." - Greg Lemond

"I enjoy climbing...I enjoy seeing people disappear behind me." - Robert Millar


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:19 am
Posts: 891
Personally, I'm a supporter of any placebo effect in fitness. If it provides any sort of performance improvement, keep doing it!


Top
   
 
 Post subject: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 1672
I remember years ago gilbert duclos-lassalle was having problems with his bike position...he asked for his seat to be lowered & his manager thought it was all in his mind...result was the seat wasn't lowered but gilbert duclos-lassalle was told it had been...duclos-lassalle went on to do very well in his next few races non the wiser...placebo...

_________________
"It never gets easier, you just go faster..." - Greg Lemond

"I enjoy climbing...I enjoy seeing people disappear behind me." - Robert Millar


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:41 pm
Posts: 245
Location: Shetland, Scotland
djconnel wrote:
All components must be structural, not specifically to aid aerodynamics. Same rule which prevents fairings.
USA Cycling specifically allowed them, viewing it as an economic fairness issue, although most fatty masters end up buying full disks anyway, even if they're no better.

http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/getOb ... M&LangId=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To me it's an area where there's some conflict between different sections, and it seems not 100% clear to me which components are intended to be covered by which parts.
Reg 1.3.024 says (paraphrasing as it won't let me copy/paste now) ANY device added or blended into the structure to decrease aero drag is prohibited.
Then, later on, the same reg specifies how to make a fairing that IS allowed - a fairing encloses a moving part and is legal if a credit card can be passed between the moving and fixed parts of the bike.

I don't see a strict requirement in terms of being "structural", maybe because that is very difficult to define/determine - Can't bolt on wheelcovers, but you can tape them? Or can't tape them but you can glue them? Or gluing, but only if done by the original manufacturer?
Not that they have gone completely away from the"difficult to define" - see that you can only tape valve holes in discs with tape supplied by the wheel manufacturer :?


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:20 am
Posts: 518
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
http://www.bikeradar.com/road/gallery/a ... ok-36168/1

Cav's bike for this year. Looks awful to me... Really 'busy'.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:19 am
Posts: 891
Image


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:20 pm
Posts: 12
Seat looks pretty far forward... Fit seems a bit off.

Plus like Cambellray said, too busy.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Posts: 902
Location: South Carolina
Yashnoon wrote:
Seat looks pretty far forward... Fit seems a bit off.

Plus like Cambellray said, too busy.


He has always ran his seat forward. If you look back at the Scott bikes, it looked worse because he ran the Arione.

HUMP

_________________
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:33 pm
Posts: 1529
Image

Cofidis is testing a new prototype Look TT bikes for use in the 2013 Tour de France.


Top
   
 
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:02 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:04 pm 
Offline
Resident master of GIF

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 2769
his saddle looks pretty centered in the 25mm offset option of seatpost imho.

_________________
Nate ★ Life , my tumblr joint
Instagramz


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 28331 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1963 964 965 966 9671889 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Attachment(s) 2016 'PRO' cycling discussion.

[ Go to page: 1475 476 477 478 479 ]

in Cycle Chat

Frankie - B

7171

576218

Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:17 pm

Frankie - B View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Interval Discussion and Resource Thread

in Training

RyanH

11

944

Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:19 pm

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Garmin Edge 820 Discussion Thread

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]

in Cycle Chat

EvilEuro

86

7072

Thu Sep 29, 2016 5:20 pm

4151zero View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling.tv review?

in Cycle Chat

SLCBrandon

12

1215

Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:21 am

AndreLM View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Attermann, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot] and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited