Wheels, Tires, Tubes, Tubeless, Tubs, Spokes, Hookless, Hubs, and more!
Moderator: robbosmans
Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
-
Slagter
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:42 am
by Slagter on Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:39 pm
pashax wrote:Rims : DT Swiss R460
Spokes : DT Revolution or Sapim Laser
Spoke count : 24/28 or 28/32
Hubs : DT Swiss 350
Nipples : Sapim Polyax (alloy)
28/32 build should be bombproof, innit?
No need for 28/32.
I'm 191 lbs at the moment, and my Bitex hubs laced to Kinlin XR19W are doing just fine in a 24/28 config after 8.000 km.
The DT 460 are both heavier and wider than my Kinlins. 24/28 is more than enough for you with that config.
-
mrlobber
- Posts: 1939
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:36 am
- Location: Where the permanent autumn is
by mrlobber on Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:45 pm
Thinking of gathering parts for a daily bad roads/gravel/occasional non-serious CX race disc clincher / possibly tubeless wheelset for my new CX bike.
Out of 3 rim options in order of personal preference (Hed Belgium+, Pacenti SL25, Stans ZTR Grail) it looks like I eventually might be getting Stans because the former 2 are not easily available for me (or cost 2x as much as Stans if shipped from abroad)
I'm a 75kg guy already for 10 years, and probably will remain there.
From hubs, nothing original at all, as good budged as possible, thinking of DtSwiss 350
Would 24F/28R be good for such a build? Most appropriate lacing pattern?
Minimum bike categories required in the stable:
Aero bike | GC bike | GC rim bike | Climbing bike | Climbing rim bike | Classics bike | Gravel bike | TT bike | Indoors bike
-
pushstart
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:12 am
by pushstart on Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:52 pm
mrlobber wrote:Would 24F/28R be good for such a build? Most appropriate lacing pattern?
I would suggest 28/28, if disc, as your braking forces concentrate up front (common to run a larger rotor up front too).
2x/2x or 3x/3x. I like the aesthetics of 2x the angle of spokes wrt radial torque is slightly better with 3x; in practice, it doesn't matter (at least it hasn't for me).
I have a set of 28/28 Grail wheels I use for CX (singletrack). Grails are really nice rims. They built up so nicely, easy to mount tires (easy to seat tubeless), have been bomb-proof. (I also weigh around 75kg.)
-
mrlobber
- Posts: 1939
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:36 am
- Location: Where the permanent autumn is
by mrlobber on Mon Apr 13, 2015 6:32 pm
Ok, thanks. Good point on the rotor difference too, easily to forget if running carbon road machines all the time.
Minimum bike categories required in the stable:
Aero bike | GC bike | GC rim bike | Climbing bike | Climbing rim bike | Classics bike | Gravel bike | TT bike | Indoors bike
-
bm0p700f
- in the industry
- Posts: 5778
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
- Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
-
Contact:
by bm0p700f on Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:33 pm
Agree with same spoke count front and reaf for disc brake wheels. For road though i always spec 160mm front and rear rotors as the brake brake is quite useful when decending and it helps it not overheat.
-
pushstart
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:12 am
by pushstart on Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:24 am
Yeah, I would use 160/160 if my frame would fit the 160. In practice the 140 in back with a good rotor (I found Avid HSX rotors to be a lot better with my Spyres than the TRP rotors) has worked fine for me, though.
-
MattSoutherden
- Posts: 1376
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:22 pm
- Location: London
by MattSoutherden on Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:52 am
I have some Pacenti SL25s 32h 3x on Novatech 771/772. If the worst you'e going to ride is some graded roads, then 28h 2x is probably fine at your weight. The advantage of more spokes is that a loose or broken spoke has a less dramatic effect on the overall wheel operation. If you take the bike off-roading out in the sticks a long way from help, then this might be of concern to you. If you taco a wheel in a cross race, it's not really a problem.
-
pushstart
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:12 am
by pushstart on Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:31 pm
Yeah, it really depends on riding style and terrain. I have no qualms riding my 28-spoke wheels on pretty rooty/rocky east-coast (US) single track. But I ride with 38c or 42c tires now to avoid pinch flats on said terrain. I am sure you could taco these wheels, though I also feel a lot more confident on them than my 28-spoke Stans Crest wheels they replaced (for reasons of hub change/thru-axle, not that anything bad happened to the Crests).
-
Derf
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:23 pm
by Derf on Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:14 pm
What are people liking for budget-level track hubs? (~$50) Miche, Formula, BHS (Bitex?), Novatech, etc?
32sp--training wheels that will be actually used on the track. Double threaded would be nice (can keep both a warm-up and a hard-effort cog on the hub).
-
Derf
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:23 pm
-
kavitator
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:07 pm
- Location: Slovenia---that forest land
by kavitator on Sun Apr 19, 2015 9:54 pm
Question for more experienced - how do you tesnsion sppokes on that kind of lacing?
Is same tesnion for all spokes on one side or same tension for each second spoke?
-
kavitator
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:07 pm
- Location: Slovenia---that forest land
by kavitator on Mon Apr 20, 2015 8:59 am
It is 2x on both sides
but spokes are not over/undr, they go direct from flange to rim.
In picture you can see big variation in "geometry " on same side.
So i was thinking spokes closer to center must have higher tension from spokes on outer holes of flange.