Pedals - Dura Ace R9100 vs Ultegra R8000

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
iamoutside
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:22 pm

by iamoutside

Hi,

Just wondering if someone can provide any input on the differences between the Dura Ace R9100 pedals vs the Ultegra R8000 pedals.

Apart from the lower weight are there any internal differences such as bearings? Would going Dura Ace R9100 be a better purchase decision over the Ultegra R8000's or are the Ultegra's better value?

Thank you!

by Weenie


ODC
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:40 am

by ODC

I can’t compare those in real life but i can compare the new 9100 vs the old 9000 dura ace pedals.
Don’t know if it’s only me but i find the new 9100 pedals less good. Every 2 weeks i need to regrease them or they are making a ticking noise.
If you compare the ultegra vs the dura ace on the internet then there is not much differences apart from the weight. Would go for the ultegra pedals there they are half the price of the dura ace pedals.

User avatar
wheelbuilder
Posts: 705
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am

by wheelbuilder

Stack height is lower on 9100.
Never cheer before you know who is winning

BdaGhisallo
Posts: 2308
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm

by BdaGhisallo

wheelbuilder wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:58 pm
Stack height is lower on 9100.
And I think the ‘Q’ factor is a mm or two less on the DA pedals.

iamoutside
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:22 pm

by iamoutside

ok, thank you for all your responses. Sounds like the Ultegra's are still better value

shimmeD
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:52 pm
Location: eNZed

by shimmeD

I value lower stack on the DuraAce more than the low cost of the Ultegra. Also I feel less like a duck with a lower Q factor. Therefore my money goes to Dura.Ace
Less is more.

JScycle
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:41 pm

by JScycle

The 9100 have a lower q factor (pedal stance/width) and a lower stack height (a lower stack height is better for power transfer).
The 9100 pedals (at least compared to 6800 pedals) have a third bearing on them. This adds more stability and can last longer before play develops.


AyBee
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:31 pm

by AyBee

JScycle wrote:
Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:16 am
(a lower stack height is better for power transfer).
Evidence?

User avatar
wheelbuilder
Posts: 705
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am

by wheelbuilder

AyBee wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 4:33 pm
JScycle wrote:
Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:16 am
(a lower stack height is better for power transfer).
Evidence?
Seriously?
Never cheer before you know who is winning

Hexsense
Posts: 933
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:41 am

by Hexsense

wheelbuilder wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 5:25 pm
AyBee wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 4:33 pm
JScycle wrote:
Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:16 am
(a lower stack height is better for power transfer).
Evidence?
Seriously?
Actually, i'd like to see too.
Just some scientific proof that it is more efficient in which condition.
So that we have more concrete knowledge, just like when they study that flat pedal is not at disadvantage to clip-in pedals at cruising speed (without surge or sprint), it is just as efficient when not going hard, which when the study shows, i then no longer reluctant to just use flat pedals on my commuter bike.
If Lower stack height is only better in a certain condition or on some people, it would be nice to know too.
Last edited by Hexsense on Tue Aug 07, 2018 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

eforce123
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:27 pm

by eforce123

what does lower stack height mean?

BdaGhisallo
Posts: 2308
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm

by BdaGhisallo

eforce123 wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 6:56 pm
what does lower stack height mean?
Pedal stack height is the distance from the bottom of your foot to the centerline of the pedal axle. It’s assumed that less is better but in my thirty years of riding, I have never read a scientific explanation of why.

Lots of factors influence it. Cleat thickness and shoe sole thickness being the primary ones.

eforce123
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:27 pm

by eforce123

BdaGhisallo wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 7:32 pm
eforce123 wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 6:56 pm
what does lower stack height mean?
Pedal stack height is the distance from the bottom of your foot to the centerline of the pedal axle. It’s assumed that less is better but in my thirty years of riding, I have never read a scientific explanation of why.

Lots of factors influence it. Cleat thickness and shoe sole thickness being the primary ones.
so the closer your foot is to the center line of the pedal is the argument on stack height right being more efficient? seeing there is no scientific evidence, just making sure I understand.

by Weenie


BdaGhisallo
Posts: 2308
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:38 pm

by BdaGhisallo

eforce123 wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 7:40 pm
BdaGhisallo wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 7:32 pm
eforce123 wrote:
Tue Aug 07, 2018 6:56 pm
what does lower stack height mean?
Pedal stack height is the distance from the bottom of your foot to the centerline of the pedal axle. It’s assumed that less is better but in my thirty years of riding, I have never read a scientific explanation of why.

Lots of factors influence it. Cleat thickness and shoe sole thickness being the primary ones.
so the closer your foot is to the center line of the pedal is the argument on stack height right being more efficient? seeing there is no scientific evidence, just making sure I understand.

Yes - low stack height is better.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post