Zipp 202 Firecrest Carbon Clincher

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
savechief
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:36 am

by savechief

I searched but didn't see a thread about the 202 Firecrest clinchers that were announced at Eurobike this past week:

http://www.zipp.com/wheels/202-firecres ... -clincher/
http://road.cc/content/news/64602-eurob ... rear-wheel

1375 grams (625 front, 750 rear)
32mm depth
25.4mm maximum width
18 spokes front, 24 spokes rear
Time VXRS Ulteam (7.16 kg)
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=120268

by Weenie


NealH
Posts: 494
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 3:40 am
Location: Triange, NC

by NealH

I think this is the wheel Contadore is riding a the Veulta (or whatever the name). Nice looking wheel but, given its weight and the fact its carbon I would rather have the DA 7900 C24 in a heart beat. Virtually the same weight and with aluminum brake surfaces and no weight limit. I already have two pair of the 7850 C24 wheels and they are outstanding. Zipp needs to get this wheel down to 1200 grams.

upside
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:26 am
Location: USA

by upside

I could almost bet that the 202 will be quite flexy.

User avatar
tommasini
Posts: 1297
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:48 am
Location: Central USA
Contact:

by tommasini

I also could almost bet that Alberto is riding the tubular version..........correct me if I'm wrong. :beerchug:

CBRE
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 1:37 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

by CBRE

tommasini wrote:I also could almost bet that Alberto is riding the tubular version..........correct me if I'm wrong. :beerchug:



Without a doubt, not sure why they bothered with the clincher.
Curt Brown

2016 Cannondale EVO Etap 13.8#'s
2012 Cannondale Supersix EVO etap 13.7#'s
2017 Cannondale SUPER X Force 16.0#'s
2016 Cannondale FatCad2 28.1#'s
2011 Cannondale Carbon Flash 1 17.9#'s

User avatar
btompkins0112
Posts: 2693
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Location: Mississippi

by btompkins0112

I'm with Neal.......all the extra weight with none of the benefits. If you are gonna pay top dollar for Zipps at least get tubulars. The sad thing is they'll get a bunch of suckers to fork out the dough for these. I'd buy the tubs in a second, however.

User avatar
HammerTime2
Posts: 5435
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed

by HammerTime2

CBRE wrote:Without a doubt, not sure why they bothered with the clincher.
Same reason as CarbonSports: Because of all the girlie-men with a lot of money, but who aren't man enough to ride tubulars.

hansonator69
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:23 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

by hansonator69

When is the 202 Firecrest going to come in mens?
Slam your stem.

JimV
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:57 pm
Location: Chicago

by JimV

I am nursing a broken collar bone because of some moron who rolled his tire in front of me. He probably believes tubulars are the only to go too. Each system has its flaws and neither is perfect. If it were up to me right now I might go along with a ban on sew ups for everyone except pro's, Because a 1/2 race is no guarantee.

User avatar
Werdna
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:45 am

by Werdna

A blown clincher inner tube can cause the tire to roll, leading to a dangerous crash.

User avatar
Mario Jr.
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:49 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

by Mario Jr.

HammerTime2 wrote:
CBRE wrote:Without a doubt, not sure why they bothered with the clincher.
Same reason as CarbonSports: Because of all the girlie-men with a lot of money, but who aren't man enough to ride tubulars.


:roll: Or live in a place where tubulars doesn't make sense because of the probability of punctures. Also, aerodynamically, the clincher versions of the newer, wider generation of wheels are superior to the tubulars.

User avatar
prendrefeu
Posts: 8610
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California
Contact:

by prendrefeu

oooooo! a Tubular vs. Clincher debate?
Awesome. :roll:


Image
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.

CBRE
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 1:37 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

by CBRE

Mario Jr. wrote:
HammerTime2 wrote:
CBRE wrote:Without a doubt, not sure why they bothered with the clincher.
Same reason as CarbonSports: Because of all the girlie-men with a lot of money, but who aren't man enough to ride tubulars.


:roll: Or live in a place where tubulars doesn't make sense because of the probability of punctures. Also, aerodynamically, the clincher versions of the newer, wider generation of wheels are superior to the tubulars.


Odd, I ride with guys who get flats damn near every ride with clinchers, I have not flatted a Veloflex tubi yet. Was at a race early in the year that had a steep 2 mile decent, 9 guys overheated carbon clincher flats on one down hill. Not trying to start a debate here but a properly glued high quality tubular is hard to beat, especially when compared to a carbon clincher rim. Poor Tony Martin flatted twice in the tour with clinchers!
Curt Brown

2016 Cannondale EVO Etap 13.8#'s
2012 Cannondale Supersix EVO etap 13.7#'s
2017 Cannondale SUPER X Force 16.0#'s
2016 Cannondale FatCad2 28.1#'s
2011 Cannondale Carbon Flash 1 17.9#'s

User avatar
shoemakerpom2010
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:28 pm
Location: Palm Coast, Fl.

by shoemakerpom2010

The more I hear of that kind of talk the more I step back from even thinking of a carbon clincher. :unbelievable:

by Weenie


User avatar
ergott
Posts: 2769
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:03 am
Location: Islip, NY
Contact:

by ergott

I've flatted 5 tubular tires already this season. These are Veloflex Carbon, Roubaix, Conti Competition and Schwalbe Ultremo HT. I'm not exactly buying crap tires. The roads here have a lot of sharp crap on them and I get 4-5mm cuts in my tires all the time. As much as I love tubulars, this is getting expensive. :cry:

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post