New shoes - Oh, suits you sir!

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:36 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

by RWH

wath wrote:The inner sides of the shoes look so plain and ugly to me, definitely not "fashionable."


I thought the shoes are very fashionable, but they do not quite mix with the socks and the artwork on the legs :unbelievable:.
Never give up, never say die.

by Weenie

Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:26 pm

by asv

People keep complaining about the price of this shoe ($450) but its in line with many of the other brands.

Sidi Ergo3 $500
Mavic Ultimate: $475
Fizik R1: $400

User avatar
in the industry
Posts: 1800
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 am
Location: SYD

by sugarkane

laager wrote:Shoes look fine. Heel retention looks crap.

It's a shoe... If you have heal retention issues then..... The last doesn't fit your hobbit feet or it's too big.. :roll:

I think they look swell. Not as euro peacock as sidis ( which I own and love ;) )

Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:03 am

by BobSantini

asv wrote:People keep complaining about the price of this shoe ($450) but its in line with many of the other brands.

Sidi Ergo3 $500
Mavic Ultimate: $475
Fizik R1: $400

In line with other shoes that are over priced.
r o y g b i v

Posts: 1992
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: France

by maquisard

Those shoes are straight homosexual country music special olympic gay.

User avatar
Posts: 1870
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am

by Wingnut

"It's not the's the ride!"

User avatar
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:56 am

by kbbpll

Take the booties off so I can see the shoes.

User avatar
Posts: 877
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:30 am
Location: So Cal

by Getter

I just can't picture anyone else besides the white guys in the Rapha videos wearing them. :doh:

User avatar
giant man
Posts: 974
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 3:39 pm
Location: Essex / Lincs UK

by giant man

As usual with Rapha, badly designed rubbish and way overpriced. Who do they think they are, Sidi?

Posts: 677
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:05 am
Location: Geneva, Switzerland

by basilic

VTBike wrote:[...] I personally ride S-works, as well as my Wife, [...]

VTB, we don't doubt that you do, but let's keep this family friendly

Posts: 269
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 4:04 am
Location: Los Angeles | Boulder

by mattiTWOROADS

can we just cut the crap about everything Rapha being "overpriced."* Whether you like it or not is one thing, but the fact is that it is priced right in line with other comparable products within the industry. These shoes are no different. I'm not saying they're great, I don't care frankly... but to categorically come out and say they are "overpriced" is absurd when that is in the ballpark of what you will pay for any top end shoe these days.

* "overpriced" being price above the norm of comparable products.

If you think all top end shoes are "overpriced", well then that's a different story, but then one has to consider all the cost along the way... maybe the raw materials then are "overpriced" and the manufacturing costs are "overpriced" and the distributor's mark-ups are "overpriced" and the retailer's mark-ups are "overpriced". At what point is it just what it costs? And I don't think there is a cycling related company out there with the capital and/or desire to take EVERYTHING in-house from raw material to distribution. And there is no one in the cycling industry that is jacking mark-ups - it's a passion-related industry - most people work in the industry because they love the sport/culture.

The problems with pricing come a lot of times at the raw materials stage. Stuff isn't cheap and everyone needs to make a little money on it or it's just not going to exist. A chamois in bibs for example, can cost up to $12 per. By the time you take all the mark-ups along the way, that's about $50 added to the retail cost of the bibs! And that's just the chamois alone!!! Shoes, to bring it back on topic, are complicated structures and I'm not surprised at their costs given the rising costs of raw materials and specialized manufacturing needed.

my $.05 (accounting for inflation)
TWO ROADS cycling clothiers ||
-------------------------------------------- ... 3235790671

Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:38 am

by bones

Too bad that the leather from the Rapha shoes are made from an endangered animal. Oh well. I guess that and the $450 add to the mystique of the shoe. Might as well also put the head of a Wild Yak on your wall too, you know, the way hunter's who kill an exotic animal do.

Posts: 459
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:33 pm
Location: bay area, california

by wojchiech

maybe rhino skin would have been better, or polar bear fur :lol:

Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:38 am

by bones

wojchiech wrote:maybe rhino skin would have been better, or polar bear fur :lol:

Or the endangered wild Yak grazing in Nepal just waiting. Waiting for those from Rapha to come for him. He will get killed at point-blank range, slaughtered, and his carcass will be put on the feet of those with $450.


Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:38 am

by bones

laager wrote:Whilst you are both patting each other on the back over the Yak and continuing to provide gross misinformation, remember that those of us with half a brain can find out that the Yak isn't endangered. Vulnerable, yes. Endangered, no. It's killed for its meat and something has to be done with the hide. Why not shoes?

Actually, wild yaks are very much endangered. They are "listed as an endangered species and the population size is abysmally declined."

Yaks are not hunted for their meat. Look it up. They are hunted for their skin and fur which are worth far more than the value of the meat. Leather used from the backs of a Yak are used in shoes cost upwards of $450 and more, as you can obviously see. While the meat sells for mere pennies in places in Tibet, Nepal, and other Central Asian countries.

by Weenie

  • Similar Topics
    Last post