The WeightWeenies website was recently updated and is now fully SSL encrypted (URLs beginning with https).
Probably you have been logged-out, we're sorry for that (was unavoidable), just login again.
When there are errors occuring please first delete cookies and browser-cache - if it doesn't help or you find other problems please post here or write short mail to email@example.com
When you have problems with Tapatalk App please re-follow/re-login.
Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please
Moderator: Moderator Team
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: South Carolina
How many of you have went to longer cranks? I had a stint on a set of 175's and feel like sometimes I would be better off. My legs are long!
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?
- Posts: 1958
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:19 pm
- Location: On Pave
All mine are now 175mm i too have long legs, i tried a friends bike with 172.5mm it felt "confined" in comparason
i like people... i just can't stand assholes
- Posts: 5097
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am
- Location: Canada
I tried it, but couldn't get used to it. Like everything else fit related, I guess that it will be different for everyone.
- Posts: 2019
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm
I experimented with up to 180s, but settled on 175. My inseam is about 84.1
Its a long story, and if you search you can find this topic discussed extensively.
My summary would be: try it.
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
- Location: New York
Been talked about ad infinitum on this forum. The answer would be use what is best for you.
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:24 pm
Rick wrote:I experimented with up to 180s, but settled on 175. My inseam is about 84.1
Its a long story
A "long story..." nice.
I'm 6'1" and use 175.
- Shop Owner
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:14 pm
- Location: USA
I have long, long legs (over 90cm) I am 183cm (6foot) and going basically the opposite way with 172.5s. If anyone is interested, I have a set of English BB Sram Red cranks in good condition in 175 I will trade for 172.5 or even 170s. I need them for my TT.
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:43 pm
My inseam is about 82cm and I am 1.76 tall. I rode 175's for 10+ yrs and now have the knee issues to show for it. While I cant, and wont, blame the crank length I cant help but wonder if shorter would have helped a bit. In my opinion there are horses for courses and this is true with crank length. Pedaling style will have a big impact on what feels right too.
I miss the Jerk because your stem is still too short.
Your saddle is probably too high as well.
Oh, and your cleats too far forward.
- Posts: 4446
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:24 pm
- Location: BELGIUM
Bit more complicated than just changing cranks.
I am 5'10 Mr. average with pretty much standard proportions. Anything from 170 to 175 which I rode before is fine.
That said, I think the range of crank lengths available does not reflect the variation in people out there.
Also, the knee is quite capable of a wider range of motion, changing length by a few mm is fine, if you change the setup on your bike. On longer cranks, I lower my saddle obviously, and slide it back a bit more as well. I prefer 175mm cranks now that way.
- 4 Replies
- 444 Views
Last post by ooo
Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:25 pm
- 16 Replies
- 2244 Views
Last post by boysa
Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:20 pm
- 41 Replies
- 3119 Views
Last post by 11.4
Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:03 am
- 4 Replies
- 803 Views
Last post by nickf
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:53 pm
- 0 Replies
- 354 Views
Last post by asa226
Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:58 pm