Discovery is done! Update: Hincapie joins t-Mobile

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderator: Moderator Team

critracer26
Posts: 635
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:23 pm
Location: New York, NY

by critracer26

I am shocked@!
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id= ... aug10news3

according to roadmag.blogspot.com Hincapie has offically joined t-mobile.
Last edited by critracer26 on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Kasparz
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Latvia

by Kasparz

What? With all this FAME USPS/Discovery should be overfilled with money and publicity. Why they quit?

User avatar
HammerTime2
Posts: 5433
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed

by HammerTime2

Trek should just title sponsor the damn team. Lance Armstrong is already a part owner of both.

Perhaps a Trek team title sponsorship would impact their ability to get other teams to ride Treks?

Stan
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 5:47 pm

by Stan

At the risk of being controversial, I think that this news together with the news that t-mobile are going to continue in the sport, is very positive for the future.

Grasschopper
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Central PA

by Grasschopper

Stan wrote:At the risk of being controversial, I think that this news together with the news that t-mobile are going to continue in the sport, is very positive for the future.

Yea because T-Mobile is known for being clean and Disco/USPS always had riders testing non-negative?

I know T-Mobile is trying to get clean and there are rumors that swirl with Tailwind but with the history I don't understand you logic.

User avatar
QuattroAssini
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:29 pm

by QuattroAssini

With all this FAME USPS/Discovery should be overfilled with money and publicity.


This is the sign from above (regardless of who or what you believe in) that cycling must change.........

Cat1
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:43 am
Location: WI

by Cat1

I think it is quite alarming that arguably the most successful team in cycling history cannot find a sponsor, especially a team that finished two riders on the podium at the tour.

Some may say well so what how does this affect weight weenies. I say its a huge impact to hard core enthusiasts like weight weenies. When huge mega team like Disco fades away that is one less team that will be testing new equipment. It is through those teams that we see new development take place. The fewer teams = slower new technology, IMO

User avatar
jersievers
Posts: 1008
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 4:39 pm
Location: Des Moines, IA

by jersievers

This is not good news in any way. Clearly shows that sponsorship is difficult to get from outside the sport. The best sell that tailwind sports has was back to Discovery. The sport and team have too much baggage to deal with to attract a 45 million over 3 year sponsor. It is very sad when one of the most wining teams in the sport has to fold up.

There are a lot of allegations that they doped, not much evidence. I think that is part of being at the top, you have to take the criticism. (I don't consider Basso to have every been on their team, he was to much in the muck by the time he got to disco to have continued doping.)

Anyone who wins a major tour in the next 5 years is going to get accused of doping. (Just saying it now)
latest project <-getting lighter @ 6920 CyclingUpdate.com

teterider
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:42 am

by teterider

The perfect sponsor to replace Discovery is Kellogg's. A US company with revenue around 10 billion and where 15 million/year is short money in the advertising department, products that fit the lifestyle, and global sales. That equals about thirty to forty 30-second commercials during prime time television.
$15 million a year is 2% of Kellogg's annual $570M advertising budget.

EDIT ON LATEST NEWS: Nevermind Kelloggs - they don't want another sponsor for the team right now.
Last edited by teterider on Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Cocolo
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:45 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

by Cocolo

jersievers wrote:Anyone who wins a major tour in the next 5 years is going to get accused of doping. (Just saying it now)


I agree with this statement 100%.

John979
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:29 pm

by John979

Cat1 wrote:The fewer teams = slower new technology, IMO


I would not go this far. Technology is at the point where new development is going to provide only marginal performance gains. Moreover, the money is still in the market and marketing. Take, for example, ceramic bearings. Much hype, little real gain, especially considering the price. One less team would not have stopped the development and testing of ceramic bearings for cycling applications, nor does its introduction provide any meaningful performance gain, unless you believe some of the misinformation going around.
John979

User avatar
CharlesM
Posts: 5771
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Phoenix Arizona

by CharlesM

If your job depended on your ability to benefit your company's image through associating with a sport, would you bet your living on taking this to your board of directors?



No US corporate marketing head can justify the cost / benefit of taking on this team on... Not even if Levi had won the tour. A simple Tour winner isn't enough for the US. Levi would have had to stop a terrorist attack, or used his bike to pull a bus full of school kids off a train track and even then he wouldn't be known as anything in this country but "Lance Armstrong's successor"...

World stars like Michael Schumacher can't get good US based gig's. The David Bek/spice girl deal is already being called one of the biggest money flops in US sports history... Just being a winner isn't good enough for an obscure sport to attract real money here...


I am hoping that Vaughters can make it work as I want at least one euro competitive team from the US. But one team is all this cycling market will support after what the UCI has let cycling become.

User avatar
J-Nice
Posts: 1474
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 12:35 am

by J-Nice

Cat1 wrote:I think it is quite alarming that arguably the most successful team in cycling history cannot find a sponsor, especially a team that finished two riders on the podium at the tour.

Some may say well so what how does this affect weight weenies. I say its a huge impact to hard core enthusiasts like weight weenies. When huge mega team like Disco fades away that is one less team that will be testing new equipment. It is through those teams that we see new development take place. The fewer teams = slower new technology, IMO


Aside from Trek frames, which I have never liked for their lack of panache and style, their equipment dept.(Bontrager) hasn't exactly set the world on fire with cutting-edge equipment and never contributed much in terms of weight-weenies related items.

Their stuff will NOT be missed in the pro peloton.

EURO
Banned
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Stockholm

by EURO

Seven-time Tour de France champion Lance Armstrong, a co-owner of the team, took a more optimistic view. "I do not think you have seen the last of this organisation in the sport, but clearly things need to improve on many levels, with a more unified front, before you would see us venture back into cycling," Armstrong added.

I'll translate; 'looks like we can't get away with our old ways anymore, so we're gonna stay out of it'.

User avatar
jalapeno
Posts: 1340
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:10 am
Location: Cornwall, UK
Contact:

by jalapeno

J-Nice wrote:
Cat1 wrote:I think it is quite alarming that arguably the most successful team in cycling history cannot find a sponsor, especially a team that finished two riders on the podium at the tour.

Some may say well so what how does this affect weight weenies. I say its a huge impact to hard core enthusiasts like weight weenies. When huge mega team like Disco fades away that is one less team that will be testing new equipment. It is through those teams that we see new development take place. The fewer teams = slower new technology, IMO


Aside from Trek frames, which I have never liked for their lack of panache and style, their equipment dept.(Bontrager) hasn't exactly set the world on fire with cutting-edge equipment and never contributed much in terms of weight-weenies related items.

Their stuff will NOT be missed in the pro peloton.


it'll show somewhere else. Much of the 'innovation' was rebadged technology from other manufacturers so the innovation will continue I'm sure.. Just 'cos disco has gone doesn't mean any lessening in the market for bike jewellery, it's the consumer market that fund innovation.
-------------------
Gravitas est meus Hostilis
Painted Roads Cycling: http://www.paintedroads.com
Words: http://mikesimagination.wordpress.com

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post