ENVE Refresh?
Moderator: robbosmans
Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
-
LedZeppelin007
- Posts: 909
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:46 pm
So, I have taken off the tape and trued the wheel twice, measuring the tension to make sure everything lined up with the Enve guidelines (120kg NDS, whatever keeps it true and dished on the drive side). The front 3.4 remains true with an Enve tire, but goes out with a 32c Conti GP5k S TR. Anyone else experience this with Enve?
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
wheelbuilder
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am
Typo, right. If not that tension and method is reversed.LedZeppelin007 wrote:So, I have taken off the tape and trued the wheel twice, measuring the tension to make sure everything lined up with the Enve guidelines (120kg NDS, whatever keeps it true and dished on the drive side). The front 3.4 remains true with an Enve tire, but goes out with a 32c Conti GP5k S TR. Anyone else experience this with Enve?
Never cheer before you know who is winning
-
LedZeppelin007
- Posts: 909
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:46 pm
the disc side is 125isg kgf and the DS is 95ish kgf. Just as Enve prescribes for the front wheel.
The wheel is true in the stand to less than 1mm.
Enve seem to think that the Conti tire is out of spec tight. It isn't: just like most contis it's a little difficult to mount but not terribly so
The wheel is true in the stand to less than 1mm.
Enve seem to think that the Conti tire is out of spec tight. It isn't: just like most contis it's a little difficult to mount but not terribly so
-
wheelbuilder
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am
Oh it's a front wheel? My mistake. You are correct.
Never cheer before you know who is winning
I'm not running them but i saw a video where they measured pogacar's wheel, which was using that combo, and they measured 33mm.
-
tonytourist
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:13 am
- Location: 90039
I had that happen on a 2.3 front running a 32 GP 5000 S TR, swapped tires and the issue was resolved. Then the rear wheel kept having spoke tension issues and so I sold them off. New ENVE stuff seems to be hit or miss but that will likely be my last set after having a several over the years.LedZeppelin007 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:59 pmSo, I have taken off the tape and trued the wheel twice, measuring the tension to make sure everything lined up with the Enve guidelines (120kg NDS, whatever keeps it true and dished on the drive side). The front 3.4 remains true with an Enve tire, but goes out with a 32c Conti GP5k S TR. Anyone else experience this with Enve?
-
robertoguinn
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2021 5:15 pm
- Location: Boulderstan
Actual width with 30mm GP5K STR on Enve 4.5 wheels is 32mm
children trust me
6.7
SL8 R-Works - 6.19kg
IG: RhinosWorkshop
IG: RhinosWorkshop
23ID better suited for as 28mm tyre. 30OD also makes for a seamless transition.
SL8 R-Works - 6.19kg
IG: RhinosWorkshop
IG: RhinosWorkshop
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
LedZeppelin007
- Posts: 909
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:46 pm
[emoji[emojiSparrie wrote:So I'm on the verge of making a decision on the enve [emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6
]
[emoji6
]][emoji
Would like to ride [emoji
[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]]].[emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]]] and I’d put [emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]s on there. There’s not much of a difference in aero performance (like [emoji
[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]] watt at high yaw angles IIRC), but the [emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]]].[emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]]]s are more stable. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
