try Imgur or smth with an external link for the gif?dannywin42 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:47 pmEven better up close. It won't let me upload a gif I made of the shiftbespoke wrote:That frame looks immense in the sun !
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Scott Addict Disc 2020
Moderator: robbosmans
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:34 pm
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:34 pm
Full bike and swapped wheels. I wanted di2 ideally but be reet, I'd take da mech over anything but da di2bespoke wrote:Lush !
Did you buy a frameset only? or is it a full bike and you swapped out the wheels?
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
okimy wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:21 amTubularsmpower wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:15 amNot sure how the pro team did to Adam Yates bike with just 6.85 kgs in racing/riding condition. Incredible!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beIFukG ... Vomv9ptbhQ
1900 boy names
6.85kg
weighet with:
pedals
bottle cages
two bottles
a standard di2 with powermeter
and even computer mount and garmin edge??
is there to trust ??
Weird, isn't it? Because I don't see anyone else achieving similar weights.REDUTOPIA wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 10:59 amokimy wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:21 amTubularsmpower wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:15 amNot sure how the pro team did to Adam Yates bike with just 6.85 kgs in racing/riding condition. Incredible!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beIFukG ... Vomv9ptbhQ
1900 boy names
6.85kg
weighet with:
pedals
bottle cages
two bottles
a standard di2 with powermeter
and even computer mount and garmin edge??
is there to trust ??
I would assume that the frame used by the Mitchelton Scott team is not the same frame as the pro frame sold to the public. If you compare the ultimate frameset and the pro frameset, the pro is rougly 80 g heavier. I would assume that the frame used by Mitchelton Scott is in fact an ultimate frame in pro disguise. Doesn't explain the measured weight differences entirely though.pmprego wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:01 pmWeird, isn't it? Because I don't see anyone else achieving similar weights.REDUTOPIA wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 10:59 amokimy wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:21 amTubularsmpower wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:15 amNot sure how the pro team did to Adam Yates bike with just 6.85 kgs in racing/riding condition. Incredible!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beIFukG ... Vomv9ptbhQ
1900 boy names
6.85kg
weighet with:
pedals
bottle cages
two bottles
a standard di2 with powermeter
and even computer mount and garmin edge??
is there to trust ??
I wouldn't be surprised if the Frame is the HMX-SL or an even "higher grade" carbon frame in disguise, nor if the paint in those bikes is some super high-tech one, like the one Pinarello and Ineos are using, like the F1 Cars... Ultralight paint can help you save some grams here and there. Also, they're running Tubular tires and wheels, which tend to be ever so slightly lighter...JMOS wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:41 pm
I would assume that the frame used by the Mitchelton Scott team is not the same frame as the pro frame sold to the public. If you compare the ultimate frameset and the pro frameset, the pro is rougly 80 g heavier. I would assume that the frame used by Mitchelton Scott is in fact an ultimate frame in pro disguise. Doesn't explain the measured weight differences entirely though.
Yep, paint alone is adding some 200 to 300grM4lukz wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:06 pmI wouldn't be surprised if the Frame is the HMX-SL or an even "higher grade" carbon frame in disguise, nor if the paint in those bikes is some super high-tech one, like the one Pinarello and Ineos are using, like the F1 Cars... Ultralight paint can help you save some grams here and there. Also, they're running Tubular tires and wheels, which tend to be ever so slightly lighter...JMOS wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:41 pm
I would assume that the frame used by the Mitchelton Scott team is not the same frame as the pro frame sold to the public. If you compare the ultimate frameset and the pro frameset, the pro is rougly 80 g heavier. I would assume that the frame used by Mitchelton Scott is in fact an ultimate frame in pro disguise. Doesn't explain the measured weight differences entirely though.
hum seems Tapatalk reduce the quality of pictures... here an extract of mydatabase.What are the stiffness numbers? The picture is low res and i font speak german
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Neither the last Addict or Izalco are really impressive comparing to quite older frames (Tarmac, SSe2 or Ultimate)
-
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:04 pm
Scott fork weight looks a bit high - mine is 374g
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
C36 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 10:55 pmhum seems Tapatalk reduce the quality of pictures... here an extract of mydatabase.What are the stiffness numbers? The picture is low res and i font speak german
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Neither the last Addict or Izalco are really impressive comparing to quite older frames (Tarmac, SSe2 or Ultimate)
extract 2020.png
All of that seems the addict not for 2020.
Source??