Cervelo C3 Fork Steerer Insert Question

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Post Reply
matty
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:43 pm

by matty

Bought my dad a C3 for his 70th birthday and due to swapping out some of the components I am unsure what needs doing with the steerer insert.

Does this have to be used and bonded in or is this dependent on what else you are using?

Was going to fit jrc expander and absolute black top cap. I guess these go into the sleeve insert rather than the carbon steerer? And if so I guess can use same loctite as using on the ceramicspeed bb.

To lighten the bike I have DT Swiss 240 laced to Yishun asymmetrical rims saving loads over the stock aksium wheels. Superlogic post and bars with c260 stem and wcs stream saddle.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



uraqt
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:53 am

by uraqt

I called support about my R5 fork and they said that a expander was ok too!

C

User avatar
wheelbuilder
Posts: 1215
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am

by wheelbuilder

uraqt wrote:
Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:12 pm
I called support about my R5 fork and they said that a expander was ok too!

C
Interesting, as I called them a couple of years ago when I was building a customers bike and they stated that if their insert, and their provided epoxy was not used in the steer tube, the frame/fork warranty would be void.
Never cheer before you know who is winning

User avatar
Calnago
In Memoriam
Posts: 8612
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago

I’d go with what Wheelbuilder’s advisor said. With a lot of these customer “support” agents, you have to wonder sometimes if they even know what you’re talking about, let alone if they know what they’re talking about. Cervelo provides that insert for a reason, to support the steertube. It is not a substitute for an expander plug. Sounds like one agent was confused perhaps. You can certainly use an expander within the bonded in insert, but typically with the insert being alloy you just use a starnut. It would also depend on the type of “expander” being discussed I suppose. Good judgement should win out here, with knowledge of what the intent of the bonded insert’s purpose is. Does the “expander” being discussed fulfill that purpose as well as the bonded in insert? If it doesn’t, then maybe it’s not the greatest idea.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ

Karvalo
Posts: 3471
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2018 6:40 pm

by Karvalo

Calnago wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:58 am
I’d go with what Wheelbuilder’s advisor said. With a lot of these customer “support” agents, you have to wonder sometimes if they even know what you’re talking about, let alone if they know what they’re talking about. Cervelo provides that insert for a reason, to support the steertube. It is not a substitute for an expander plug. Sounds like one agent was confused perhaps. You can certainly use an expander within the bonded in insert, but typically with the insert being alloy you just use a starnut. It would also depend on the type of “expander” being discussed I suppose. Good judgement should win out here, with knowledge of what the intent of the bonded insert’s purpose is. Does the “expander” being discussed fulfill that purpose as well as the bonded in insert? If it doesn’t, then maybe it’s not the greatest idea.
Hey Cal, in this case you should RTM. The Cervelo customer support agent does know what he's talking about. Excerpt from the official Cervelo Fork Owners Manual;

"Cervélo recommends the use of the supplied alloy insert sleeve and pre-installed star nut to preload the headset. The use of a compression plug (not provided) in place of the insert sleeve is permitted, but this substitution will not provide the same resistance to clamping damage due to over-tightening of the stem."

User avatar
Calnago
In Memoriam
Posts: 8612
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago

Seems like there were two very different answers from two different support people. I would consider simply telling a customer “sure, you can use an expander instead” as a bit irresponsible as some expanders provide a great deal of internal support while others provide virtually none. I think my response is pretty consistent with what’s in the manual... use judgement knowing that some expanders may not provide the support that the internally bonded sleeve would.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ

Karvalo
Posts: 3471
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2018 6:40 pm

by Karvalo

Calnago wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:00 pm
I think my response is pretty consistent with what’s in the manual...
Well, no - because you said you'd go with what Wheelbuilder's advisor said, and Wheelbuilder's advisor said the warranty would be void. The manual says that's not the case.

By the way, since pretty much every other frame company says you can use expanders without specifiying what are good or bad expanders, is the entire industry also irresponsible?

User avatar
Calnago
In Memoriam
Posts: 8612
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago

You’re being pedantic. I think the advice that was given to Wheelbuilder was much more reasonable and I’d use the bonded in insert. It’s easy to do and provides peace of mind. I generally like to go with the manufacturers’ recommendations on these things. And I’m not making any blanket statements about other manufacturers based on another’s recommendations. Perhaps the OP should make a phone call to Cervelo himself.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ

stevod
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:09 am

by stevod

I'd go with this post / author:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92744#p797291

It's from 2011 although I don't think the insert has changed.

Karvalo
Posts: 3471
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2018 6:40 pm

by Karvalo

Calnago wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:23 pm
You’re being pedantic. I think the advice that was given to Wheelbuilder was much more reasonable
Sorry, literally the only thing that Wheelbuilder said he was told was that the warranty would be void if the insert wasn't used, and that's not true. How exactly do you figure that's pedantic?
I generally like to go with the manufacturers’ recommendations on these things.
And in this case the manufacturer says it's ok to use expanders as long as you don't overtorque the stem - I'm retty sure you weren't planning on doing that anyway, right? Revisiting your earlier logic, if they say it's ok, they must have a good reason.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply