The green argument is actually interesting! However, as cyclist we already -arguably- tend to be much greener than the average person who drives cars or motorbikes etc, and to be honest I think a bit of brake fluid to be changed every now and then isn’t a big deal (or is it?) considering how much emissions we “save” already as a category.Beaver wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:36 amOk, something new: What about an ecological comparison? Is it wrong to presume brake fluid doesn't shine here? Same for electrical drive trains with electric motors and batteries? Rim brakes and mechanical shifting are simply greener!
Tour Mag.: Dry no real difference but a bit better in the wet.
Scott Bikes Rim Brake Future
Moderator: robbosmans
It's not that "decisive for the war", I would guess. Running a car is far worse, or regular cheap flights or cruises, the cargo ships bringing our bikes (and everything else) from China running with heavy oil etc. It's a global matter and if the rich countries are "clean" and therefore the poor "dirty", it won't help much.robeambro wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:06 amThe green argument is actually interesting! However, as cyclist we already -arguably- tend to be much greener than the average person who drives cars or motorbikes etc, and to be honest I think a bit of brake fluid to be changed every now and then isn’t a big deal (or is it?) considering how much emissions we “save” already as a category.
But e.g. electronic drivetrains with parts that will be special waste and batteries that take a lot of energy to be produced, need to be reloaded and later recycled, are not that ideal... And all of that for a little more comfort.
If we really want to save this world and keep it a place worth living in, everybody has to start with her-/himself...
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
+1
Electronic groupsets and electric bikes with their batteries etc. is a step towards the wrong direction in terms of a greener planet. You have the perfect ecological machine and you turn it into something that is considerably less so.
Electronic groupsets and electric bikes with their batteries etc. is a step towards the wrong direction in terms of a greener planet. You have the perfect ecological machine and you turn it into something that is considerably less so.
Half the people here drive a gas car to a group ride so they can ride a carbon bike produced in a carbon emitting factory. I'm sure electric shifitng isn't adding more to this situation on the whole scale.
I wish I’d thought about this before getting an Ultegra Di2 bike. Fair point. I guess manufacturers veering towards electronic-only models doesn’t help either..Beaver wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:37 amIt's not that "decisive for the war", I would guess. Running a car is far worse, or regular cheap flights or cruises, the cargo ships bringing our bikes (and everything else) from China running with heavy oil etc. It's a global matter and if the rich countries are "clean" and therefore the poor "dirty", it won't help much.robeambro wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:06 amThe green argument is actually interesting! However, as cyclist we already -arguably- tend to be much greener than the average person who drives cars or motorbikes etc, and to be honest I think a bit of brake fluid to be changed every now and then isn’t a big deal (or is it?) considering how much emissions we “save” already as a category.
But e.g. electronic drivetrains with parts that will be special waste and batteries that take a lot of energy to be produced, need to be reloaded and later recycled, are not that ideal... And all of that for a little more comfort.
If we really want to save this world and keep it a place worth living in, everybody has to start with her-/himself...
We had reached a point where there was no real room for improvement - electronic devices now offer plenty of it (smaller, lighter, faster, longer running time etc.) for some time. In the end there will also be stagnation like on the smartphone market now. We will see what happens then.robeambro wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:49 pmI wish I’d thought about this before getting an Ultegra Di2 bike. Fair point. I guess manufacturers veering towards electronic-only models doesn’t help either..Beaver wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:37 amIt's not that "decisive for the war", I would guess. Running a car is far worse, or regular cheap flights or cruises, the cargo ships bringing our bikes (and everything else) from China running with heavy oil etc. It's a global matter and if the rich countries are "clean" and therefore the poor "dirty", it won't help much.robeambro wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:06 amThe green argument is actually interesting! However, as cyclist we already -arguably- tend to be much greener than the average person who drives cars or motorbikes etc, and to be honest I think a bit of brake fluid to be changed every now and then isn’t a big deal (or is it?) considering how much emissions we “save” already as a category.
But e.g. electronic drivetrains with parts that will be special waste and batteries that take a lot of energy to be produced, need to be reloaded and later recycled, are not that ideal... And all of that for a little more comfort.
If we really want to save this world and keep it a place worth living in, everybody has to start with her-/himself...
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 2:29 pm
Not Specialized. They are pretty much cutting out rim brake versions. For now they offer some frames as rim brake, but not full bikes. I had a discussion with them about this and their argument was the industry is going toward disc brakes.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 2:29 pm
even 1/2 lb of extra weight is a big disadvantage. They are also harder to work on and configure yourself.ChiZ01 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:31 pmafter using mechanical disk for 2 month, there is really no comparison, better modulation, more stopping power, easier to clean, it is the future. also have other advantages of more tire clearance, ease to swap between 700c and 650c wheels. the only downside is the 2 lb extra weight
While I do agree that disc brakes have some advantages, they are small enough in some situations to not outweight the negatives. It's not as clear cut of an improvement as say moving the shifters from the down tube to the brake hoods or indexed shifting over non. I'd put it more inthe camp of electronic over mechanical. There is a reason both are still offered. I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for brakes.
Personally, I don't want the extra weight or aerodynamic loss of discs. Rim brakes work perfectly fine for my uses and they are trivial to maintain.
-
- Posts: 864
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 2:25 am
- Location: New York
It is really that Specialized is moving to discs only because it will have the chance to generate a more substantial revenue stream where consumers invest in more expensive bikes, new sets of wheels and other components as well as pay for more expensive maintenance services. If this was my business I would convert everyone to discs as well.packetloss wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 6:36 pmNot Specialized. They are pretty much cutting out rim brake versions. For now they offer some frames as rim brake, but not full bikes. I had a discussion with them about this and their argument was the industry is going toward disc brakes.
This opportunity to turn everyone onto a disc bike is the best thing since carbon. For a typical road bike I am perfectly content and safe riding in the wet, dry, down 13000ft mountains with zero concerns.
Moots Vamoots RSL (2019)-Super Record 12
Cervelo S1 (2010)-Super Record 12
Kestrel RT700 (2008)-Dura Ace 9000
Mosaic GT-1 (2020)-SRAM Red viewtopic.php?f=10&t=174523
Cervelo S1 (2010)-Super Record 12
Kestrel RT700 (2008)-Dura Ace 9000
Mosaic GT-1 (2020)-SRAM Red viewtopic.php?f=10&t=174523
double edge sword, they will also lose profit because people will be replacing their $2000 carbon wheelset less often, $40 rotor vs $900 Enve rim.rollinslow wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:24 pmIt is really that Specialized is moving to discs only because it will have the chance to generate a more substantial revenue stream where consumers invest in more expensive bikes, new sets of wheels and other components as well as pay for more expensive maintenance services. If this was my business I would convert everyone to discs as well.packetloss wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 6:36 pmNot Specialized. They are pretty much cutting out rim brake versions. For now they offer some frames as rim brake, but not full bikes. I had a discussion with them about this and their argument was the industry is going toward disc brakes.
This opportunity to turn everyone onto a disc bike is the best thing since carbon. For a typical road bike I am perfectly content and safe riding in the wet, dry, down 13000ft mountains with zero concerns.
The whole wearing out carbon rims argument has been way overplayed. How many people do you know running rim brake carbon rims have actually worn out their carbon rims from normal wear and tear? They are much harder and more durable in that regard than alloy rims. And for that matter how many alloy rims have you actually worn out in the past from just wear and tear? This was an argument used early on about an advantage of discs. It really isn’t that valid unless you are truly wearing out your rims pretty regularly. I know I’m not and don’t know anyone who is. I’m sure you can find a few in the internet, however. The way some people go on you would think they’re wearing out a set of rims every month or so. I still have my first set of carbon Boras from 2010 that are perfectly fine.
It’s no secret that Specialized would like the rim brake market to just be dead. I think it’s somewhat of an embarrassment to them that by now it’s still alive and well. And to finally get their pros to use discs they just stopped making rim brake models. End of discussion. No more choice. So there. Ok. Thank you Specialized.
It’s no secret that Specialized would like the rim brake market to just be dead. I think it’s somewhat of an embarrassment to them that by now it’s still alive and well. And to finally get their pros to use discs they just stopped making rim brake models. End of discussion. No more choice. So there. Ok. Thank you Specialized.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:38 am
I love all the people who claim to be "sick of it". Literally no one is forcing you to buy it. No one if forcing you to buy anything at all. All of these retro grouch traditionalists, just turned off that someone else could like something they don't. Makes zero sense.Lewn777 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:51 amAfter using mechanical and hydraulic disk brakes on motos, MTBs and CX bikes for over 20 years I hate the idea of disk brakes on a road bike. Marketing department driven marginal gains in the wet only.
Direct mount brakes, wheel rim surfaces adn rim brake blocks are still evolving.
I've got Shimano Dua-Ace on DT Swiss alloy rims, disk brakes are not better in the dry, you're just adding weight and complication for absolutely no reason, couldn't ask for better power or modulation. It's the 26inch-to 27.5inch MTB wheel American/Taiwanese manufacturer driven money grab 2.0. Most people shouting loudly for disk brakes are simply suffering from post purchase rationalization or are seeing psychological benefits. Why you'd seek add weight and complication to your bike for such marginal gains is beyond me.
Sorry to be so aggressive in my opinion, but I'm sick of this.
That said, your take on performance is also hot garbage. As someone who rode for 6 years then raced for another 8 years, I've now been on disc for two years. I will never go back. If you live in a hilly and/or mountainous region, it's a HUGE advantage, period. The modulation is sooo much better than rim brakes, and you can slow and stop on steep descents using one finger. Also huge.
Last year was the first year I did the Eastern Sierras for a week, and being able to stop so easily on a 25 mile descent through switchbacks is a big deal as well. When I come back from a long ride, my hands/fingers/wrists, etc. aren't sore like they were prior.
I have nothing against calipers, and similarly, you need not have anything against a product you don't care about. Why try to convince strangers otherwise? To what ends?
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:38 am
Teammate went through THREE sets of Enve's on steep descents. This really depends on where you live, the kind of riding you do, and your weight. I'm not a heavy rider, but I've ruined two sets, as I delaminated one wheel and completely torched another by wearing the pads done to the housing, another huge issue with carbon hoops and calipers. And alloy rims? Those also wear out after about 3 years. Just had my buddy ruin her rear hoop which now needs replacement. Not uncommon at all if you put in big miles.Calnago wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:13 pmThe whole wearing out carbon rims argument has been way overplayed. How many people do you know running rim brake carbon rims have actually worn out their carbon rims from normal wear and tear? They are much harder and more durable in that regard than alloy rims. And for that matter how many alloy rims have you actually worn out in the past from just wear and tear? This was an argument used early on about an advantage of discs. It really isn’t that valid unless you are truly wearing out your rims pretty regularly. I know I’m not and don’t know anyone who is. I’m sure you can find a few in the internet, however. The way some people go on you would think they’re wearing out a set of rims every month or so. I still have my first set of carbon Boras from 2010 that are perfectly fine.
It’s no secret that Specialized would like the rim brake market to just be dead. I think it’s somewhat of an embarrassment to them that by now it’s still alive and well. And to finally get their pros to use discs they just stopped making rim brake models. End of discussion. No more choice. So there. Ok. Thank you Specialized.
These argumets are EXCELLENT for those who liver in flatter areas or don't ride big miles, but for others, disc brakes are a huge improvement, period.
Brilliant post, and I so agree. Specialized is a trash company and I’d never own anything they make. And yes, this crap about “wearing out” rims of any sort is hilarious. The marketing folks can be smart; they sold aero carbon wheels to the masses who will not benefit 1% from them less they ride 25-30 mph at the perfect yaw angle. Fools.
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6283
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
Disc brakes, in their current incarnations, aren't aero. I'm sure we all guessed that. The magnitude of the difference is fairly significant.
"We've measured a 16% increase in wheel drag between a disc-braked wheelset and a standard wheelset", Jean-Paul told us. "We performed a direct back to back test of the Zipp 303FC in standard version and disc brake version, for our own competitor comparison purposes. That 16% is a constant offset in the performance curve across the entire cross wind angle range."
So there's work to be done there, but how much can actually be done? The extra drag essentially comes from three sources. The rotor itself adds drag, and because disc wheels need more spokes to cope with braking forces there's more drag there too. On top of that, a disc hub contains more material and needs to be built to withstand torque across the hub body, as the braking forces are on one side only. Because of that, the hub body is generally bigger and that increases drag as well.
What can be done about those three sources of extra drag? In reality, probably not a huge amount, and disc systems will likely continue to be at a disadvantage in terms of aerodynamics. So if you want to be as slippery as possible, it's rim brakes for the time being. And hide them, if you can.
https://road.cc/content/feature/213876- ... ind-tunnel
"We've measured a 16% increase in wheel drag between a disc-braked wheelset and a standard wheelset", Jean-Paul told us. "We performed a direct back to back test of the Zipp 303FC in standard version and disc brake version, for our own competitor comparison purposes. That 16% is a constant offset in the performance curve across the entire cross wind angle range."
So there's work to be done there, but how much can actually be done? The extra drag essentially comes from three sources. The rotor itself adds drag, and because disc wheels need more spokes to cope with braking forces there's more drag there too. On top of that, a disc hub contains more material and needs to be built to withstand torque across the hub body, as the braking forces are on one side only. Because of that, the hub body is generally bigger and that increases drag as well.
What can be done about those three sources of extra drag? In reality, probably not a huge amount, and disc systems will likely continue to be at a disadvantage in terms of aerodynamics. So if you want to be as slippery as possible, it's rim brakes for the time being. And hide them, if you can.
https://road.cc/content/feature/213876- ... ind-tunnel
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com