by TobinHatesYou on Wed Dec 05, 2018 10:25 am
Regarding the development of trainer hardware, yes and no. The Wahoo KICKR was released in late 2013 and has only really seen incremental upgrades in the past 5 years. The 2016 model got rid of the strain gauge, redesigned the handle, added real TA support and a slightly quieter drive mechanism. The 2017 model improved disc brake caliper clearance and added KICKR Climb support. The 2018 model redesigned the drive mechanism to use a quieter belt and increased the flywheel size (slightly improving its max power.)
While all these improvements are appreciated, none of them are gamechanging...none of them actually require significant upgrades to the electronics.
Likewise for other brands, the updates have been similar. The Tacx Neo 2 is barely changed from the 3-year-old Neo. The Cycleops H2 is even less of an upgrade compared to the 2.5 year old Hammer.
I thought about using one of the various holiday 20% coupons on a slight upgrade...I ordered both a Neo 2 and a KICKR18...cancelled both after deciding they really weren’t an improvement over my CycleOps Hammer.
The key to this space is price, not chasing spec improvements. Nobody wants a trainer that can simulate 30% grades and provide 3000W resistance. Everybody wants a KICKR/Hammer/Neo to be significantly cheaper. That’s why the KICKR Core, Elite Direto and Tacx Flux are so important. That’s why the new Elite Zumo exists.
I think smartbikes have a place in the market because the Peloton/spin class model is currently kicking Zwift’s ass (they aren’t profitable and won’t be for a long time...they have secured a lot of funding though, so they are fine.) But again, the market for a $3200 smartbike isn’t important... These things need to provide all the same functionality for between $1000-$1500, and preferably on the lower end of that range. Smartbikes for hardcore cyclists though? I’d much rather buy a $900 KICKR CORE and have the $2300 leftover for an Ultegra-level spare bike.
Again, the Tacx Neo Bike Smart’s advantages are a cleaner design (might matter for living room aesthetics,) programmable gear changes (11 speeds, 12, 13, 14, more,) virtual braking support (not yet implemented on any major platform) and lots of adjustability. It’s just not worth the price of admission to me right now.