HammerTime2 wrote:What do you call this?TimW wrote:I have officially given up on Campagnolo cranksets. Integrated spider means no crank based Power Meter anyway.
At least try to be factually correct in your rants.
Unaffordable
Moderator: robbosmans
HammerTime2 wrote:What do you call this?TimW wrote:I have officially given up on Campagnolo cranksets. Integrated spider means no crank based Power Meter anyway.
At least try to be factually correct in your rants.
TwiggyTN wrote:Bro, Campagnolo ARE tools. It's a large part of their heritage as a company. You should probably just stick to SRAM....
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4
Causidicus wrote:TimW wrote:...why can't they make a decent simple to fit and maintain modern crankset?
They do. Ultra-Torque. It is arguably the most elegantly simple crank design yet seen and fits any shell.
TimW wrote:Causidicus wrote:TimW wrote:...why can't they make a decent simple to fit and maintain modern crankset?
They do. Ultra-Torque. It is arguably the most elegantly simple crank design yet seen and fits any shell.
Yeah, the one they are replacing with Over-Torque and the same good design they dropped from the lower range in favour of Power Torque (e.g. Athena)
TimW wrote:HammerTime2 wrote:What do you call this?TimW wrote:I have officially given up on Campagnolo cranksets. Integrated spider means no crank based Power Meter anyway.
At least try to be factually correct in your rants.
Unaffordable
BikeTart wrote:I read somewhere yesterday that the new slim EPS power unit will not work with the current interface module. I'm sharing partly as a heads-up and partly in the hope that someone will / can do some real world testing when the new power unit becomes available (which, I know, is still a little way off yet).