"PRO" Cycling Discussion

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderator: Moderator Team

User avatar
elviento
Posts: 1235
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry
Contact:

by elviento

Agreed, if we are going by the exposure team sponsors got, Saxo Tinkoff got their money's worth. Certainly way more than the likes of Sojasun, BMC, etc.
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

HUMP DIESEL
Posts: 902
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Location: South Carolina
Contact:

by HUMP DIESEL

djconnel wrote:Excellent example: Contador scored big positive points in my mind from the way he rode this year. The quality of the race is the thing, not who wins it, and Contador made the race.


Tell that to the guy that wins. I don't race not to win, what is the point? If I wanted to train, I would train and not spend money on racing. When I line up the intent is to win or my teammate to win.

HUMP
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?

by Weenie


User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

Winning is great. However, my interest in a race goes well beyond who wins.

We're so obsessed with winning, that winning is all that matters, we get ourselves in a hole where cheating is inevitable. The competition is the thing, not the result, and since cheating destroys the competition, the win has no value.

User avatar
btompkins0112
Posts: 2693
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Location: Mississippi

by btompkins0112

Yes, that's not entirely true that winning is everything otherwise riders wouldn't get into breakaways that are 90% unsuccessful. TV time is important for sponsors and non-bicycle industry sponsors like that as much as winning, since winning says nothing about the advantages of their products.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

User avatar
HammerTime2
Posts: 5428
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed

by HammerTime2

The win has no value? Trek sold a lot of bikes based on the now vacated TdF victories by Lance Armstrong.

Floyd's Ride for the Ages increased the brand awareness for Phonak hearing aids.

Etc.

+1 on btompkins' observations as well.

petepeterson
Posts: 1402
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:58 am
Location: 604

by petepeterson

some of the most popular riders rarely win bike races. Look at chava and voigt. They ride with panache and people love them.

Winning is important. Entertainment is more important.

Monkeyboy3333
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:41 pm

by Monkeyboy3333

i'm with Petepete here. For my viewing pleasure anyway, but then I am not a competitive racer/racer at all

airwise
Posts: 1049
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:31 pm

by airwise

djconnel wrote:Excellent example: Contador scored big positive points in my mind from the way he rode this year. The quality of the race is the thing, not who wins it, and Contador made the race.


Sorry but for me he just hopelessly rode off when every tom dick and harry knew he would blow up and get caught. As predictable as anything else and utterly pointless.

spud
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:52 am

by spud

as utterly predictable as when Contador took off on stage 18 (or whatever it was) of the Vuelta last year?

You may think you know the result, but the reality is that when a guy like Contador makes a move, even one most deem foolhardy, there's always the possibility that he'll stick it. And that's what makes racing interesting.

Froome showing up to my local training race does not make it an interesting race. It's only interesting if other hitters show. And yes, they all want to win, but there's only one winner. For the entertainment value, it's equally important that someone loses. But that doesn't make them losers.

And getting back to onepoint, Tinkov is making his philosophy pretty clear - win or else. Unless you believe that #2 - #10 at the Tour didn't train hard enough, or commit themselves enough, you can guess the ramifications.

KB
Posts: 3868
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 12:32 pm
Location: HULLGARIA UK

by KB

My view of this Tour was that it was much better than last year's borefest. And for me the best stage, by far, was when they got caught in the crosswinds, and on a flat stage. OPQS started it off, but when Saxo went to the front it was great to watch.

I thought Saxo made a good fist of it. Same with Movistar; it would have been an even better race for them if Valverde hadn't of had bad luck.

User avatar
Tinea Pedis
Posts: 8443
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Location: Geelong
Contact:

by Tinea Pedis

spud wrote:as utterly predictable as when Contador took off on stage 18 (or whatever it was) of the Vuelta last year?

Bingo.

He kept trying moves all race, including the cross wind stage. Man should be applauded, not derided for riding like some garden variety idiot.

petepeterson
Posts: 1402
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:58 am
Location: 604

by petepeterson

Tinkoff is a joke. Even if he is acting as would I assume this this video is embarrassing at best. Feel free to fast forward to the end where he discusses going home to have sex.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzSJsD-ICOA

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

HammerTime2 wrote:The win has no value? Trek sold a lot of bikes based on the now vacated TdF victories by Lance Armstrong.

Floyd's Ride for the Ages increased the brand awareness for Phonak hearing aids.

Etc.

+1 on btompkins' observations as well.


Obviously the "win at all costs" view dominated during Lance's & Floyd's time. I'm arguing for the way it should go to take pressure off cheating. Finishing 2nd w/o cheating can't be viewed as worse than winning while cheating. There needs to be a change in perception. Guys like Tinkoff are a bad influence.

User avatar
ave
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Hungary

by ave

Thanks petepeterson,
That was a good one. Now I know why I am not a millionare. Not that I want to be one.

User avatar
MarkGiardini
Posts: 494
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:55 am
Location: Vladivostok

by MarkGiardini

petepeterson wrote:Tinkoff is a joke. Even if he is acting as would I assume this this video is embarrassing at best. Feel free to fast forward to the end where he discusses going home to have sex


I don't know if his "jokes" get lost in translation, but he's just not funny.
His army of yes men and puppets would be the only ones who find him funny, out of fear for losing their lives otherwise..
KWalker wrote:chill out perv dogs, homegirl is still only 17.

by Weenie


Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post