Direct drive trainers and carbon frame fatigue
Moderator: Moderator Team
- BernieMoves
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:22 pm
- Location: Austria | Slovenia
- Contact:
Most manufacturers will tell you whether their frames are safe to use on an indoor trainer. I use mine heavily but still avoid sprints out of the saddle though.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
- eucalyptus
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 3:51 am
- Location: Sweden
I think it depends on a lot of factors.
First off weight, if you are light 50-75kg is vastly different than if you are +110kg pushing.
Then secondly "how fixed" the bike and trainer is. My Tacx Neo 2T swings very nicely side to side. My impression is that Waho Kickr V5/V6 is much more fixed and not tilting sideways which means all the forces go to the frame instead of the tilting function inside the trainer.
Also what frame you are using, a super thin sub 700 gram carbon frame dont really have much material than if you compare with +900 or +1000 gram carbon frame, hell most chinese frames are north of +1000 gram and they will probably be able to take a lot more beating than a superlight thin frame.
Sum up: you will probably be fine. Just because there are risks doesn't mean it will happen to you.
But personally I bought a new aluminum bike just for this (brand new Scott speedster 20 is perfect for zwift). I would never use a Tarmac SL8 or similar on a trainer and especially not if I were a heavy guy. But that is just my take on it Because I don't wanna take that unecessary risk when it is so easy to avoid...
N+1 bike always
First off weight, if you are light 50-75kg is vastly different than if you are +110kg pushing.
Then secondly "how fixed" the bike and trainer is. My Tacx Neo 2T swings very nicely side to side. My impression is that Waho Kickr V5/V6 is much more fixed and not tilting sideways which means all the forces go to the frame instead of the tilting function inside the trainer.
Also what frame you are using, a super thin sub 700 gram carbon frame dont really have much material than if you compare with +900 or +1000 gram carbon frame, hell most chinese frames are north of +1000 gram and they will probably be able to take a lot more beating than a superlight thin frame.
Sum up: you will probably be fine. Just because there are risks doesn't mean it will happen to you.
But personally I bought a new aluminum bike just for this (brand new Scott speedster 20 is perfect for zwift). I would never use a Tarmac SL8 or similar on a trainer and especially not if I were a heavy guy. But that is just my take on it Because I don't wanna take that unecessary risk when it is so easy to avoid...
N+1 bike always
As far as I understand there is a risk and it is not a small one...
I have a BMC SLR 02 Teammachine and I am 88kgr. Just starting to cycle a bit more and was wondering if I could also train in the Winter. I also have an MTB aluminum which I might be able to use it for training.
I have a BMC SLR 02 Teammachine and I am 88kgr. Just starting to cycle a bit more and was wondering if I could also train in the Winter. I also have an MTB aluminum which I might be able to use it for training.
BMC SLR "Black Beauty"
Not a small one?
I think the risk is very small and the only problem will be when the rider doesn't use common sense. I mean that the frame in fixed in a plane. Don't try to sprint with side to side torque and you'll be fine.
Getting some kind of rocker plate or motion system will also help but still don't apply aggressive side loads to your frame.
If you do normal training on a trainer, between endurance and vo2max power, you'll be totally fine.
You know this question gets asked every year just before indoor season. And every time it gets asked the same discussion occurs. Just imagine the number of carbon frames on direct drive trainers these days. Most bike frames are carbon and most trainers are direct drives. Yet no one talks about this until just before indoor season. And no one talks about this just after indoor season is over. So......draw your own conclusions.
Sent from my SM-S918W using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S918W using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 13785
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
Based on my own experiences, your trainers will develop issues long before your carbon frame will.
-
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:05 am
Have killed a cheap aluminium frame with carbon seat stays a decade or so ago. Aluminium cracked in a chain stay. The very flexible low grade CF seat stays probably enabled it.
Current stiff aluminium frame has been fine but I am now older and less powerful and less inclined to spend time on the trainer. It bores the sht out of me.
Current stiff aluminium frame has been fine but I am now older and less powerful and less inclined to spend time on the trainer. It bores the sht out of me.
Based on the posts I've seen on various forums and FB groups, I could probably count on one hand how many failures I've seen reported.
In fact, I've seen more posts about aluminium handlebars failing from sweat corrosion than carbon frame breaking.
In fact, I've seen more posts about aluminium handlebars failing from sweat corrosion than carbon frame breaking.
Not a discussion worth having. From all parts involved in a direct drive trainer setuo, including all the gear you have on the bike, the frame will be the last thing "wearing" out.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com