Jugi wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:57 pm
I find your approach to this really tedious.
Then simply ignore.
Jugi wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:57 pm
Once a person has a powermeter installed, it is producing constant information about one's output. For example my average heart rate varies 10-15bpm between my morning/afternoon 70-80min commute while averaging same power, which equates to more than 50% of a HR zone.
And this would be precisely why I would say you need a heart rate monitor, because your effort levels are fluctuating during your 70-80min commute, something your power meter alone is not telling you. I would also suspect that your lactate levels are fluctuating during your commute as well, something else your power meter is not telling you. But in any event, a 10-15bpm HR change, and the likely corresponding change in lactate levels, aren't significant enough to be concerned about so I see now issue in maintaining a consistent power during the commute.
Jugi wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:57 pm
Thinking a prick test is as easily done as following data from a powermeter is basicly bonkers. How could I prick test myself while alone on the road? Powermeter data is there and it is readily available.
You're being overly dramatic. Children with diabetes prick themselves alone while at school every single day - surely you had friends in school with diabetes who carried around glucose monitors? Powermeter data is only useful if it is tied to some baseline biological marker. You can choose among a host of markers as mentioned several times. You may be inclined to think FTP is simpler or easier - well I will certainly admit FTP it is more familiar for the masses given the numerous resouces available online on FTP testing and zones, and everything else may seem strange, foreign and complicated. But if the same infrastructure were available for lactate testing for the masses, I assure you would feel differently.
Just to give you a sense of how mundane lactate testing is while training:
1. A video of what appears to be a HIGH SCHOOL track team doing lactate testing - the table is really a bit dramatic lol I'm guessing they just started testing, typically it's just some guy with a backpack or athletic bag standing by the road.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJNtFKRWVJQ
2. Katusha-Alpecin - "This video is about Our Team doing a series of tests on San Salvador to
determine nutritional and training zones for the upcoming season." (farewell team Katusha!)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYEF2E48doI
Once you practice a few times (or have a coach show you how to do it a few times), you can easily do it on your own outdoors, it's really not difficult, although I would still recommend doing it indoors on rollers or a turbo or ergometer so you're not distracted. I understand it is unfamiliar and uncommon outside of a team setting, but that does not mean it is difficult to do and is extremely common in the professional world.
And keep in mind, training to lactate, or MLSS, or heart rate zones, or power zones based on MLSS (FTP) or some other lactate-related threshold/point, all began as something "only the pros" used to do. It all trickled down. FTP is a way of bringing MLSS based training to the masses. It's not the only approach and who knows what will be the next "trend" in the future.
Jugi wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:57 pm
A Functional Threshold Test is just a Test. It's not an absolute result of anything - it is only one of many variables, which can be used to scale training intensity and effort level. Everybody with any understanding of structured training should perceive a test event (whatever the protocol) as a way of determining one's physical abilities and more importantly, any changes in that ability. Therefore testing protocol, conditions etc. should always be the same, and the result is only that test's result. Much more useful information can be gained by training and racing close to one's limits.
The issue herein lies on the
sole reliance on FTP as the scale for
all training intensities. I just want people to be aware that (1) there are viable and very successful alternatives to using a power meter and (2) even if you use a power meter, there are viable and very successful alternatives to using FTP as the primary basline.
If this discussion is tiring you, again you can simply choose to ignore or not reply.