Well... it's a Boone with every single geometry parameter changed except reach and chainstay length (which can be changed if you want), and a different design of every single tube and structural element. So it's a Boone that will ride, fit and handle very differently to a Boone. Hmm, maybe it's easier to just say that it's not a Boone?
Something new from Trek
Moderator: Moderator Team
What is your concern about the front Isospeed? Just wondering, as I haven't heard much about it other than that the effect less significant than the rear Iso. I've been curious as to how front Iso relates to the lower headset bearing. It seems like they've given the upper bearing seat this freedom to rotate for/aft, which allows the steerer to bow, but the lower bearing is expected to behave normally. I just dont quite get how the steerer bowing doesn't affect or increase wear on the lower bearing, as it seems like it would allow it to rock in the frame and get all sorts of uneven loading.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
I share exactly the concerns that you stated. The entire “flex” area of the steertube is isolated to the headtube length. Unless the bearings are allowed to “pivot” with that flex, then there’s gotta be some nasty bearing pressure going on at times. But I think the larger issue for me is that there’s just a lot of parts and bushings rubbing against each other, and sooner or later I suspect some clunking etc as a result. And I question just how much more comfort it’s really providing beyond just simply playing with tires and pressure etc. I like simple engineering that works. This imo is just adding a lot of complexity and I’m not sure it’s providing a commensurate amount of added benefits. I haven’t ridden one, but I did ask a dealer who kind of shared my view as well and I’ve heard that if you hit a sudden bump etc, that you could hear a bit of the “clunk” that one might expect when looking at the system. But I suppose that could simply have been due to less than perfect adjustment. But there again, it kind of demands a higher degree of “perfect adjustment” by design I think. And if it’s so great, one has to wonder why they would have left it off a bike like this. It wouldn’t be the first time something’s been tried and market tested, but then abandoned either because the technology wasn’t so great after all, or the market just didn’t fully embrace it. I guess time will tell.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:55 pm
I suspect what’s going on is that they are reserving it to be a feature on a future SLR model. We’ll see front iso become available next year as an incentive to upgrade or buy a nicer model.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- in the industry
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:34 pm
- Location: CO
off topic...slightly butt when are new Crockett colors going to be released?
The trade mark looks open https://trademarks.justia.com/724/62/no ... 62455.html. They probably didn't want to confuse people with Nomad , which is held.