The general all-things Road forum!
Moderator: robbosmans
-
notsoenduro
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 12:18 am
by notsoenduro on Mon Oct 14, 2024 9:12 pm
FuCH wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 11:15 am
spdntrxi wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 1:29 am
notsoenduro wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 1:21 am
Has anyone considered (or recommend against) cutting down the unwanted width of the handlebar drops? shave some grams... Happens all the time on MTBs why not Canyon's drops? The clamping and leverage with the T bar should remain unaffected?
that's baked in to the design of MTB bars.. I dont think you have thought of this enough or atleast seen the bars in the flesh.
+1 I believe the more material is left there, the better for the the strength of the bar structure. I read somewhere that the nerrower you go on these the better (nobody was about to make any cuts).
I have seen it and played around with the width adjustment. If it structurally it works at its the widest setting, then the narrower setting is carrying excess material. The clamping / screw point is where the connection is made.
-
Philbar72
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:47 am
by Philbar72 on Tue Oct 15, 2024 10:12 am
xiyuwang wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 2:21 pm
notsoenduro wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2024 3:02 am
Hi Has anyone swapped the factory DTSWISS Arc 1400 or 1600 Wheelset and noticed an improvement to an already incredible bike? I am not getting along with the 25mm tyre width for the front wheel and while I can bump that up to 28-30mm, I've read elsewhere that its not a recommended fit for the front rim given the narrow intenral (20mm) and external (27mm) rim widths. DTSwiss recommends the 25mm as the optimised tyre width. Can you share more on this before I buy wider tyres, or just accept the spec of the wheels is outdated and therefore a wheel upgrade will provide a better result?
28c gp5000 str fits the ARC 50mm and 62mm variants without going over the outer width of the rim noticeably, i.e., it looks legit. 30c might be a bit too wide if you care about the looks. TBH, the performance differences between 1600, 1400, and 1100 are marginal, they are all stiff and durable. It is just the lower-tier variants are a bit heavy. If you go for other brands, say, Zipp, you might find Zipp's are softer in corners and the hub durability is trash. For Shimano's, it feels similar to DT's, but I don't like the fact that Shimano's hub is hard to tear down and maintain (it is durable for sure). So, DT's is overall very balanced, and will survive various torture with ease. A better upgrade would be something like a DT240/DT180 hub plus a rim from another brand, a common choice is ENVE.
using a set of ultegra 50mms they are stiff, but not particularly fast. reliable.... yes so far. the hubs are solidly built.
-
BigBoyND
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 1:51 am
by BigBoyND on Tue Oct 15, 2024 2:45 pm
KalleWirsch wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 12:13 pm
Sorry, I don´t get it.
You wrote the two bikes have 563mm and 473mm. This is a difference. Then, you say there is no difference? Could you please explain why there is no difference when at the same time the numbers are different by 9cm?
Thanks!
I didn't write those numbers. Someone else did. The two bikes are identical in stack and reach. Canyon is changing the provided reference measurement point from tops to hoods.
-
PaulJ
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 1:42 pm
by PaulJ on Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:20 am
Has anyone got their Di2 battery stored in the seat post? I don't really want to put it in the downtube, seat post would be much more preferable.
-
BadBoyR
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:41 pm
by BadBoyR on Fri Oct 18, 2024 5:02 pm
PaulJ wrote:Has anyone got their Di2 battery stored in the seat post? I don't really want to put it in the downtube, seat post would be much more preferable.
Does it fit into the seatpost? Can’t you just use bubble wrap and tape?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
BadBoyR
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:41 pm
by BadBoyR on Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:47 pm
PaulJ wrote:I've no idea, the bike is on order, should be around a month so I can't check yet!
I’ll check and report back, my groupset hasn’t been delivered yet, so will have to wait a bit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
PaulJ
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 1:42 pm
by PaulJ on Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:54 am
BadBoyR wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:47 pm
PaulJ wrote:I've no idea, the bike is on order, should be around a month so I can't check yet!
I’ll check and report back, my groupset hasn’t been delivered yet, so will have to wait a bit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Perfect, thank you!
-
notsoenduro
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 12:18 am
by notsoenduro on Tue Oct 22, 2024 12:36 am
xiyuwang wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 2:21 pm
notsoenduro wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2024 3:02 am
Hi Has anyone swapped the factory DTSWISS Arc 1400 or 1600 Wheelset and noticed an improvement to an already incredible bike? I am not getting along with the 25mm tyre width for the front wheel and while I can bump that up to 28-30mm, I've read elsewhere that its not a recommended fit for the front rim given the narrow intenral (20mm) and external (27mm) rim widths. DTSwiss recommends the 25mm as the optimised tyre width. Can you share more on this before I buy wider tyres, or just accept the spec of the wheels is outdated and therefore a wheel upgrade will provide a better result?
28c gp5000 str fits the ARC 50mm and 62mm variants without going over the outer width of the rim noticeably, i.e., it looks legit. 30c might be a bit too wide if you care about the looks. TBH, the performance differences between 1600, 1400, and 1100 are marginal, they are all stiff and durable. It is just the lower-tier variants are a bit heavy. If you go for other brands, say, Zipp, you might find Zipp's are softer in corners and the hub durability is trash. For Shimano's, it feels similar to DT's, but I don't like the fact that Shimano's hub is hard to tear down and maintain (it is durable for sure). So, DT's is overall very balanced, and will survive various torture with ease. A better upgrade would be something like a DT240/DT180 hub plus a rim from another brand, a common choice is ENVE.
Thanks the feedback.. I am getting more and more feel for the ARC 1600 and you're spot on. I feel like they do let the bike down with the weight, and I've had a few scary cross wind moment that unsettled the front at high speed. I do enjoy the stiffness.
-
thirdsun
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2021 3:20 pm
by thirdsun on Tue Oct 22, 2024 9:37 am
notsoenduro wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2024 1:22 am
Hi anyone know if Canyon advertised weight includes or excludes the tubes? I know they weight the size Large. Combined for me, they measured 210gm when i took them off.
Of course the weight includes tubes.
- Canyon Aeroad CF SLX 8 Di2
- Cervelo Caledonia Rival eTap AXS
- Vitus Venon Evo
- Canyon Grail CF SL 8 Di2
-
BadBoyR
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:41 pm
by BadBoyR on Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:00 pm
PaulJ wrote:BadBoyR wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:47 pm
PaulJ wrote:I've no idea, the bike is on order, should be around a month so I can't check yet!
I’ll check and report back, my groupset hasn’t been delivered yet, so will have to wait a bit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Perfect, thank you!
Unfortunately, doesn’t fit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk