Cannondale SuperSix Evo4

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Bfriesen
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2020 5:20 pm

by Bfriesen

robeambro wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:44 am
Does anyone know whether the gravel/cx version of the Evo follows the same update cycle, and if so, we can expect a new model to be presented this year? I personally would love a threaded-bb and integrated cables update..
The Supersix CX wasn't released until the second half of 2021. The regular model was released around the same time in 2019. So even if it was one the same update timeline, you'd still be looking a 2 years down the road.
2020 Cannondale Supersix
2021 Argon 18 Gallium Disc
2018 Trek Crockett

SixThirteen
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 11:49 am

by SixThirteen

https://www.bikeradar.com/news/2023-uci-approved-bikes/

"The UCI-approved frameset list shows the as-of-yet unreleased new Cannondale SuperSix Evo will be offered in three frameset options:

Cannondale SuperSix Evo 4
Cannondale SuperSix Evo 4 SL
Cannondale SuperSix 4 Hi-Mod
The current generation SuperSix is offered in Carbon and Hi-Mod options. The Hi-Mod version uses Cannondale’s lightest and stiffest top-spec carbon layup."
Scott Foil RC10 Ultegra 12 speed / Creston 50 - 7.9Kg

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Golden
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:03 pm

by Golden

Do we know if the 4 has the same geometry as the 3?

matcav
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 3:52 pm

by matcav

Golden wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:47 pm
Do we know if the 4 has the same geometry as the 3?
looks pretty much the same:
matcav wrote:
Wed Jan 11, 2023 8:41 pm
quick comparison between V3 and V4 frames
(click on the pic to check the differences)

matcav
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 3:52 pm

by matcav

matcav wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:02 pm
Golden wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:47 pm
Do we know if the 4 has the same geometry as the 3?
looks pretty much the same:
matcav wrote:
Wed Jan 11, 2023 8:41 pm
quick comparison between V3 and V4 frames
(click on the pic to check the differences)
Attachments
ssixevo.gif

User avatar
C36
Posts: 2471
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:24 am

by C36

matcav wrote:
matcav wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:02 pm
Golden wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:47 pm
Do we know if the 4 has the same geometry as the 3?
looks pretty much the same:
matcav wrote:
Wed Jan 11, 2023 8:41 pm
quick comparison between V3 and V4 frames
(click on the pic to check the differences)
To be taken with great care, those are renderings just to display colours.

wickedstealthy
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:16 pm

by wickedstealthy

This is a taken
3982A675-7480-4CD7-9D73-9587E9FCA62C.jpeg
from a dealership brochure.
Think geo is the same

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12457
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

wickedstealthy wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:35 pm
This is a taken3982A675-7480-4CD7-9D73-9587E9FCA62C.jpeg from a dealership brochure.
Think geo is the same

Looks that way. Two fork offsets to cover the range while also maintaining 58mm trail (except for the smallest size.) So again, 54cm ends up being unusually long and slack up front.

wickedstealthy
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:16 pm

by wickedstealthy

TobinHatesYou wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:02 pm
wickedstealthy wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:35 pm
This is a taken3982A675-7480-4CD7-9D73-9587E9FCA62C.jpeg from a dealership brochure.
Think geo is the same

Looks that way. Two fork offsets to cover the range while also maintaining 58mm trail (except for the smallest size.) So again, 54cm ends up being unusually long and slack up front.
Don't see really an issue with that to be honest.

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12457
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

wickedstealthy wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:28 pm

Don't see really an issue with that to be honest.

I prefer a longer front-center as well.

ry5n
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 8:22 pm

by ry5n

Anyone hazard a guess why they've gone with the V-shaped steerer? (And what might be needed to run a standard stem?)

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12457
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

ry5n wrote:
Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:44 am
Anyone hazard a guess why they've gone with the V-shaped steerer? (And what might be needed to run a standard stem?)
Internal routing with less than a 1.5" upper bearing pretty much requires a 1.25" bearing, split ring and some kind of non-round steerer.

ry5n
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 8:22 pm

by ry5n

Right, but why not go D-shaped (or some variation, like Cervélo)? For that matter, why not go with flat sides, like BMC? I'm imagining that at this stage of the integration game, the engineers will have some reason for doing things differently...

dudemanppl
Posts: 1263
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:09 am

by dudemanppl

Yikes I'm aggravated about how high the stack is.

User avatar
Spinnekop
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: South Africa

by Spinnekop

wickedstealthy wrote:
Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:35 pm
This is a taken3982A675-7480-4CD7-9D73-9587E9FCA62C.jpeg from a dealership brochure.
Think geo is the same
That's the Old Evo3 Geo
"In my experience, there is only one motivation, and that is DESIRE.
No reason or principle contain it or stand against it........"

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply