Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!
Moderator: robbosmans
-
kublaiboy
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:23 am
by kublaiboy on Fri May 14, 2021 4:57 pm
Hi,
I was looking at Yoeleo R11 geometry chart. 59cm seems to be my size. But if you look at the stack and head tube length on a 59 vs a 56. It doesn't seem to make sense. The stack on a 59cm(579mm) is nearly the same as a 56cm(578mm). However, the 59 head tube is 175mm and the 56 head tube is 155mm. Is this right? If there's 20mm head tube difference, how can you have stack height nearly the same? Can anyone explain this to me. I'm not very technical when it comes to bike geometry. Thanks!
KB
https://www.yoeleobike.com/products/car ... -frame-r11
-
Orlok
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:36 pm
- Location: Almere - Nederland
by Orlok on Sat May 15, 2021 9:09 am
kublaiboy wrote: ↑Fri May 14, 2021 4:57 pm
Hi,
I was looking at Yoeleo R11 geometry chart. 59cm seems to be my size. But if you look at the stack and head tube length on a 59 vs a 56. It doesn't seem to make sense. The stack on a 59cm(579mm) is nearly the same as a 56cm(578mm). However, the 59 head tube is 175mm and the 56 head tube is 155mm. Is this right? If there's 20mm head tube difference, how can you have stack height nearly the same? Can anyone explain this to me. I'm not very technical when it comes to bike geometry. Thanks!
KB
https://www.yoeleobike.com/products/car ... -frame-r11
R11_geometry.jpg
Ask it Yoeleo my friend.!
Once comes a time that you'll have a tailwind
Pinarello F10 - Ultegra 8050 Di2 - Carbonspeed C38 Tubeless
-
kublaiboy
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:23 am
by kublaiboy on Mon May 17, 2021 2:33 am
Yeah, sent an email to Yoeleo two days ago. No reply.
I think the geometry chart has a typo for 59cm stack. If you look at the stack difference between other sizes, 54 vs 56, the stack difference is very significant: 541mm vs 578mm.
-
ms6073
- Posts: 4291
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
by ms6073 on Mon May 17, 2021 3:06 pm
That geometry table seems to be somewhat inaccuracte. For a size 56 frame, how do you end up with a 394.5 mm reach with a 560 mm top tube on hte size 56
- Michael
"People should stop expecting normal from me... seriously, we all know it's never going to happen"
-
AlanMorgan
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:58 pm
by AlanMorgan on Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:15 pm
Old thread, I know but I thought I'd add my theory. I've ordered an R11 frame in size 56, thinking that the stack of 578 was correct for me. Whilst waiting for my frame............... I have been doing some more research. The R11 apppears to come out of the same mould as the Miracle CR016-SL. The quoted stack for the Miracle in size 56 is 558. For every other frame size, the Miracle and R11 dimensions are almost exactly the same. I think the typo is in the 56 dimensions for the Yoeleo, not the 59.
Just hope I've got the right frame size now...
-
LouisN
- Posts: 3523
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
- Location: Canada
by LouisN on Thu Jan 06, 2022 7:20 pm
kublaiboy wrote: ↑Fri May 14, 2021 4:57 pm
Hi,
I was looking at Yoeleo R11 geometry chart. 59cm seems to be my size. But if you look at the stack and head tube length on a 59 vs a 56. It doesn't seem to make sense. The stack on a 59cm(579mm) is nearly the same as a 56cm(578mm). However, the 59 head tube is 175mm and the 56 head tube is 155mm. Is this right? If there's 20mm head tube difference, how can you have stack height nearly the same? Can anyone explain this to me. I'm not very technical when it comes to bike geometry. Thanks!
KB
https://www.yoeleobike.com/products/car ... -frame-r11
R11_geometry.jpg
Yoeleo's website is full of spec errors.
When I was shopping for rims I noticed all specs were copy/pasted from each other. I wrote a message, some corrections were made.
Louis
