Sigeyi Axo Power Meter Spider
Moderator: robbosmans
My Sigeyi AXO for Rotor Aldhu arrived earlier this week and I had the time to install it yesterday before taking a spin on the trainer. It was reading a bit low straight after the installation but after ~15 minutes it was very close to the Assiomas I used as comparison. Came with 3.719 firmware and there were no spikes, but that's only after an hour of usage.
Yep power spike issue completely gone for me as well.
I actually saw it on pretty much every ride before 3.719 (1300-1800w random jumps) and I haven't seen it pop back up yet, I have a lot more confidence in this pm now other than the stupid chainline issues I mentioned before. No qualms against reccomending it.
The only reason I'd consider a quarq over a sigeyi is that the 165 xx1 arms are exclusively in the 8 bolt pattern.
I actually saw it on pretty much every ride before 3.719 (1300-1800w random jumps) and I haven't seen it pop back up yet, I have a lot more confidence in this pm now other than the stupid chainline issues I mentioned before. No qualms against reccomending it.
The only reason I'd consider a quarq over a sigeyi is that the 165 xx1 arms are exclusively in the 8 bolt pattern.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
Did a first test of my Xcadey Xpower S on Rotor ALdhu 4 bolt 110 today.
Test conditions:
Bike: Bianchi Oltre XR4
Power Meter: XCADEY X Power-S Rotor Aldhu 4 bolt reporting via ANT+ to a Garmin 800
Trainer: Elite Direto Reporting via ANT+ to a Garmin 820
Data uploaded to zwiftpower and compared using the analysis tool.
I cycled for 10 mins on the trainer before running calibration of the Elite Direto on the E-training app . Offset value was 6180 with the orignial at 6184, so pretty much almsot spot on.
I did two rides, one of 10 and approximately one of 5 minutes.
Unfortunately the power data from the 10 minute ride didnt seem to record properly, but the 5 minute one was fine and is attached below. There is one instance of a dropout from the trainer and one instance wheer I put the hammer down but doesnt seem to be matched by the trainer, but I need to investigate this to see if this is just an issue where the trainer has difficulty ramping up the power in short time instances.
From first impressions I am achieving similar results to GPLama where the XCADEY is consistently under reporting power by approximately 4-5%. given that this is comparing spider versus hub based power then tthe difference goes up to close to 6-7% given drivetrain losses.
I will do another test then report back.
Test conditions:
Bike: Bianchi Oltre XR4
Power Meter: XCADEY X Power-S Rotor Aldhu 4 bolt reporting via ANT+ to a Garmin 800
Trainer: Elite Direto Reporting via ANT+ to a Garmin 820
Data uploaded to zwiftpower and compared using the analysis tool.
I cycled for 10 mins on the trainer before running calibration of the Elite Direto on the E-training app . Offset value was 6180 with the orignial at 6184, so pretty much almsot spot on.
I did two rides, one of 10 and approximately one of 5 minutes.
Unfortunately the power data from the 10 minute ride didnt seem to record properly, but the 5 minute one was fine and is attached below. There is one instance of a dropout from the trainer and one instance wheer I put the hammer down but doesnt seem to be matched by the trainer, but I need to investigate this to see if this is just an issue where the trainer has difficulty ramping up the power in short time instances.
From first impressions I am achieving similar results to GPLama where the XCADEY is consistently under reporting power by approximately 4-5%. given that this is comparing spider versus hub based power then tthe difference goes up to close to 6-7% given drivetrain losses.
I will do another test then report back.
-
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
Update:
did a longer ride, this time having the XCADEY report to my Fenix 5 and the Elite Direto report to my Garmin 820.
the Xcadey is defintely under reporting by about 6-7%, see attachement below. Otherwise it does well. the direto does not report cadence very well so it tends to overshoot the sprint power abit.
did a longer ride, this time having the XCADEY report to my Fenix 5 and the Elite Direto report to my Garmin 820.
the Xcadey is defintely under reporting by about 6-7%, see attachement below. Otherwise it does well. the direto does not report cadence very well so it tends to overshoot the sprint power abit.
Sigeyi AXO 8-bolt for Shimano MTB weights:
Sigeyi AXO spider: 81.5 grams
SM-CRM85 34T: 128.4 grams
FC-MT900 34T: 83.9 grams
same weight as FC-M9100 chainring
This means if you are coming from a MT900 or XTR M9100 crank with a 34T and install the Sigeyi powermeter:
-83.9 grams
+81.5 grams
+80.8 grams
+7.7 grams
=86,1 grams
Your bike is now 86,1 grams heavier.
Sigeyi AXO spider: 81.5 grams
SM-CRM85 34T: 128.4 grams
- Chainring: 80.8 grams
- Screws: 7.7 grams
- Spider: 39.9 grams
FC-MT900 34T: 83.9 grams
same weight as FC-M9100 chainring
This means if you are coming from a MT900 or XTR M9100 crank with a 34T and install the Sigeyi powermeter:
-83.9 grams
+81.5 grams
+80.8 grams
+7.7 grams
=86,1 grams
Your bike is now 86,1 grams heavier.
Giant TCR Adv Pro Disc '17 · BH Lynx Race Evo '19 · Seraph GR029 '21 · Canyon Inflite AL '14
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:33 pm
Did a Ramp Test yesterday on my Sigeyi Axo MTB version (8 bolts)
This are the results. Kickr 4 vs Sigeyi. Both are calibrated before start by warming up at least 10 minutes.
Doubt it means much but in many cases they align 1:1 in my case. I'm confident enough to just use Kickr 4 for my training.
This are the results. Kickr 4 vs Sigeyi. Both are calibrated before start by warming up at least 10 minutes.
Doubt it means much but in many cases they align 1:1 in my case. I'm confident enough to just use Kickr 4 for my training.
How cannot I take seriously someone called MagicShite!
Nah mate, just kidding!
Thanks for the report and sounds pretty good so far.
Nah mate, just kidding!
Thanks for the report and sounds pretty good so far.
- jekyll man
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:23 am
- Location: Pack filler
Ramp test in erg mode is fairly constant so you would expect(!!) them to be fairly close, although you can get a "push me, pull me" effect if using 2 meters.MagicShite wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 2:37 amDid a Ramp Test yesterday on my Sigeyi Axo MTB version (8 bolts)
This are the results. Kickr 4 vs Sigeyi. Both are calibrated before start by warming up at least 10 minutes.
Doubt it means much but in many cases they align 1:1 in my case. I'm confident enough to just use Kickr 4 for my training.
Where you will probably notice differences is in fairly variable power situations such as short intervals or zwift racing to close gaps, but results are promising
Official cafe stop tester
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:33 pm
It is entirely intentional!
You are absolutely right. I do find that on some edge cases it sometimes doesn't track very well (at higher shorter power around 30-1 minute) Kickr tends to read a bit higher in this regard.jekyll man wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 10:49 amRamp test in erg mode is fairly constant so you would expect(!!) them to be fairly close, although you can get a "push me, pull me" effect if using 2 meters.MagicShite wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 2:37 amDid a Ramp Test yesterday on my Sigeyi Axo MTB version (8 bolts)
This are the results. Kickr 4 vs Sigeyi. Both are calibrated before start by warming up at least 10 minutes.
Doubt it means much but in many cases they align 1:1 in my case. I'm confident enough to just use Kickr 4 for my training.
Where you will probably notice differences is in fairly variable power situations such as short intervals or zwift racing to close gaps, but results are promising
Sometimes when the temperature settles in and everything falls into place i get 1:1 even when riding around without Ergo Mode. At this point unless I invest in a third power meter I wouldn't be able to exactly pinpoint what went wrong.
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:33 pm
Here is another normal sample ride that I did earlier.
Bear in mind that this is done on a 11-51T cassette on a kickr 4 + 34T shimano M8100 crankset. I'm not sure if running such a configuration would affect Kickr's reading or not especially at extreme chainlines. (I crashed my road bike earlier and I'm still waiting for a replacement, I'm currently recovering from breaking my femur due to the earlier crash and hence I'm mostly on the MTB)
The peak power seems to dip a bit lower and I could not explain why, otherwise they match pretty 1:1.
Bear in mind that this is done on a 11-51T cassette on a kickr 4 + 34T shimano M8100 crankset. I'm not sure if running such a configuration would affect Kickr's reading or not especially at extreme chainlines. (I crashed my road bike earlier and I'm still waiting for a replacement, I'm currently recovering from breaking my femur due to the earlier crash and hence I'm mostly on the MTB)
The peak power seems to dip a bit lower and I could not explain why, otherwise they match pretty 1:1.
-
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
- robbosmans
- Moderator
- Posts: 2792
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 12:40 pm
- Location: Central Belgium
- Contact:
I just received my Suito and will compare it to my xcadey spider
Lets see if I can gain 10W.
Lets see if I can gain 10W.
Which comparison program is that you're using?davidalone wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:05 amUpdate - Xcadey Xpower-S scaled up to 110% and with their latest firware looking very good now. My main concern is the work in testing needed to check the power meter- many people wont have the resources to verify the power meter readings.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Posts: 12566
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm