Scott Addict Disc 2020
Moderator: robbosmans
-
- Posts: 7038
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
They use a half dummy (just legs and pelvis) for aero testing. The Trek Emonda and Giant TCR are among the least aero all-rounders tested. I think the Lapierre Xelius is down near the bottom too. The Emonda also has a BB stiffness in the 55N/mm range, not the stiffest, but also in the "sweet spot" where power losses are minimal, but comfort is maintained.
-
- Posts: 801
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:04 pm
Marvinman wrote:Below is the canyon - seems to suggest they tested with 62mm DT Swiss. On the comparison chart posted earlier in the thread, the grey bar compares the bikes when all have Zipp 404s fitted:
'You can't tell that the Aeroad came onto the market in 2014. In combination with the chic handlebar stem unit, its frame still looks up to date. In terms of aerodynamics, the bike is still one of the best in its field. Canyon relentlessly exploits the price advantage of direct sales with lleora. Equipped with Ultegra-Di2 group, carbon wheels from DT Swiss with 62 millimeters high. Interesting detail: The front turns from top tires and the wheel is a 23 millimeter narrow tire over rims for aerodynamic reasons, the rear is a more comfortable, easier rolling 25er. The short head tube and a correspondingly low positioned handlebar bring an aerodynamic posture. The slim seat post effectively iron out bumps. There are still very few racing bikes that manage the balancing act between aerodynamics and feather comfort in a similarly convincing manner.'
Can’t seem to find the comparison chart with grey shading ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I 100% biased but I think that's a good result for the scott, especially given the higher head tube when compared to the other two. If they use the bike+a half dummy, a bike with a lower head tube (and the aeroad really goes to the extreme here), thus lower overall, will always be more aero as a consequence.
-
- Posts: 7038
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
pmprego wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:59 am
I 100% biased but I think that's a good result for the scott, especially given the higher head tube when compared to the other two. If they use the bike+a half dummy, a bike with a lower head tube (and the aeroad really goes to the extreme here), thus lower overall, will always be more aero as a consequence.
It’s an acceptable result, but the SuperSix, Tarmac, Izalco Max and Teammachine are all faster.
-
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:34 pm
.. in a static windtunnel with a half mannequin on them lolTobinHatesYou wrote:pmprego wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:59 am
I 100% biased but I think that's a good result for the scott, especially given the higher head tube when compared to the other two. If they use the bike+a half dummy, a bike with a lower head tube (and the aeroad really goes to the extreme here), thus lower overall, will always be more aero as a consequence.
It’s an acceptable result, but the SuperSix, Tarmac, Izalco Max and Teammachine are all faster.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
How did Tour evaluated those? With comparable wheels of course.TobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:08 pmpmprego wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:59 am
I 100% biased but I think that's a good result for the scott, especially given the higher head tube when compared to the other two. If they use the bike+a half dummy, a bike with a lower head tube (and the aeroad really goes to the extreme here), thus lower overall, will always be more aero as a consequence.
It’s an acceptable result, but the SuperSix, Tarmac, Izalco Max and Teammachine are all faster.
Nevermind, you're cherry picking here. The test are never really comparable among the different bikes. Ride whatever makes you happy which will make you faster. That's the quote, right?
-
- Posts: 7038
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
dannywin42 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:30 pm.. in a static windtunnel with a half mannequin on them lolTobinHatesYou wrote:pmprego wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:59 am
I 100% biased but I think that's a good result for the scott, especially given the higher head tube when compared to the other two. If they use the bike+a half dummy, a bike with a lower head tube (and the aeroad really goes to the extreme here), thus lower overall, will always be more aero as a consequence.
It’s an acceptable result, but the SuperSix, Tarmac, Izalco Max and Teammachine are all faster.
Correct, but we can also make some intelligent observations as to why. The Scott offset steerer design requires an oversized headset upper, translating to an oversized headtube. The Addict’s seatstays also aren’t dropped to the same extent as the other frames mentioned.