Dura-Ace R9200

[TerryDi2C]

I think one of the photos erroneously refers to R9250, when it means R9270.

Both are probably correct, there is a reference to R9250 in E-tube project 4.0.4's dll files.
Maybe they'll name it R9250 and then use R9270 just for the disc levers, like they're doing now

(But yeah, that photo mentions the lever so it should be R9270)

[Ritxis]

Scott RC 15 render......Ultegra (uggly, uggly crankset )

[bikewithnoname]

oh my, that's rather agricultural

[LainOTN]

Aerodinamics or desintegrating cranks solution?

[tiz92]

Scott RC 15 render......Ultegra (uggly, uggly crankset )

For gods sake. Its really ugly. But if its light and doesnt brake it will be okay.

[petromyzon]

Aerodinamics or desintegrating cranks solution?

I think it's for the powermeter. Needs to be symmetrical so calibration is roughly even in the forward and backpedal directions.

[RDY]

Scott RC 15 render......Ultegra (uggly, uggly crankset )

For gods sake. Its really ugly. But if its light and doesnt brake it will be okay.

I suspect it'll be heavier and still break, but PM right side will work.

[ipenguinking]

If that Ultegra crank on the Scott is real, then the DA version would have similar shape but better finish. Like always

[RDY]

If that Ultegra crank on the Scott is real, then the DA version would have similar shape but better finish. Like always

We've seen the DA one on this thread, but people seemed to believe that because it had tape on it covering logos, the final shape would be different. Not according to that render.

[ipenguinking]

If that Ultegra crank on the Scott is real, then the DA version would have similar shape but better finish. Like always

We've seen the DA one on this thread, but people seemed to believe that because it had tape on it covering logos, the final shape would be different. Not according to that render.

I would be surprised if DA and Ultegra components from same generation don't share the family look

[Robius]

It looks like an FSA K-Force WE crankset. Let's hope DA is better looking.

[LanceLegstrong]

Is there any reason the current 8000/9100 cranksets wouldn't work with the new 12-speed? Based on some of the pictures, I'd rather just keep my current 9100 crankset, unless the new one is drastically lighter.

[spdntrxi]

Is there any reason the current 8000/9100 cranksets wouldn't work with the new 12-speed? Based on some of the pictures, I'd rather just keep my current 9100 crankset, unless the new one is drastically lighter.

depends on the chain... crankarms would work, just not the chainrings possibly.

[RDY]

Is there any reason the current 8000/9100 cranksets wouldn't work with the new 12-speed? Based on some of the pictures, I'd rather just keep my current 9100 crankset, unless the new one is drastically lighter.

depends on the chain... crankarms would work, just not the chainrings possibly.

Chain appears to be XTR like. 12s XTR works better on current gen DA chainrings and, cassettes than 11s DA chain.

Chainline should be the same.

[spdntrxi]

^ I'm hopeful.. I dont run DA cranksets.. so less I have to change the better.