Dura-Ace R9200

[pmprego]

Where that thm clavicula people?? Bring it on!

[ullmanz]

Am I missing something or isn't even the Ultegra crankset only around 681g for 52/36? So there is not super much improvement by your cranks. (Although they include a PM)

[ryanw]

Am I missing something or isn't even the Ultegra crankset only around 681g for 52/36? So there is not super much improvement by your cranks. (Although they include a PM)

This is gold.

Crankset (52-36t, 170 mm w/PM)
R8100: 769g
R9200: 748g

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

[ullmanz]

Am I missing something or isn't even the Ultegra crankset only around 681g for 52/36? So there is not super much improvement by your cranks. (Although they include a PM)

This is gold.

Crankset (52-36t, 170 mm w/PM)
R8100: 769g
R9200: 748g

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

The weights listed here look different: https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/ ... R8000.html
Or is that just the lift crank without the right side?

[garbageman]

Am I missing something or isn't even the Ultegra crankset only around 681g for 52/36? So there is not super much improvement by your cranks. (Although they include a PM)

This is gold.

Crankset (52-36t, 170 mm w/PM)
R8100: 769g
R9200: 748g

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

The weights listed here look different: https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/ ... R8000.html
Or is that just the lift crank without the right side?

That's an R8000 crank...we're talking about 12s.
https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/ ... 100-P.html

[ullmanz]

Am I missing something or isn't even the Ultegra crankset only around 681g for 52/36? So there is not super much improvement by your cranks. (Although they include a PM)

This is gold.

Crankset (52-36t, 170 mm w/PM)
R8100: 769g
R9200: 748g

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

The weights listed here look different: https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/ ... R8000.html
Or is that just the lift crank without the right side?

That's an R8000 crank...we're talking about 12s.
https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/ ... 100-P.html

my bad, sorry about that

[scottydonald]

Ouch, very jealous of the setups to be!

[Mike1]

What I'll be using with mine

Wow that's impressive weight! Nice one

[Maddie]

Am I missing something or isn't even the Ultegra crankset only around 681g for 52/36? So there is not super much improvement by your cranks. (Although they include a PM)

This is gold.

Crankset (52-36t, 170 mm w/PM)
R8100: 769g
R9200: 748g

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

The weights listed here look different: https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/ ... R8000.html
Or is that just the lift crank without the right side?

That's an R8000 crank...we're talking about 12s.
https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/ ... 100-P.html

Carbon-Ti is 11s too. So you could compare it to the FC-9100P which is around 690g

[garbageman]

Carbon-Ti is 11s too. So you could compare it to the FC-9100P which is around 690g

Carbon-Ti say their 110 BCD 5 arm rings are "compatible with Shimano, SRAM and Campagnolo 11-12 speed chains and groups." The R9100 powermeter is also inaccurate. So the comparison is Shimano is heavier, more expensive, and inaccurate (r9100) or much heavier and more expensive (r9200).

[BigBoyND]

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

Is the Quarq v1 the same crank as Red22 BB30? Or how is it so light? That looks like a great option.

[garbageman]

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

Is the Quarq v1 the same crank as Red22 BB30? Or how is it so light? That looks like a great option.

It's the same crank as Red AXS DUB. ~340g

[scottydonald]

Quarq v1 Carbon-Ti (172.5mm) - 585g
EastonEC90SL Carbon-Ti - 643g

So I'm 184 and 163g lighter than what Shimano are offering and have longer cranks...

Is the Quarq v1 the same crank as Red22 BB30? Or how is it so light? That looks like a great option.

It's the same crank as Red AXS DUB. ~340g

Interesting.

I was thinking a 54/40 DuraAce but this is huge as the only thing against my Cervelo is the weight.

Without Power 53/30 what is the option and weight? 175mm

[BigBoyND]

It's the same crank as Red AXS DUB. ~340g

So just 10g lighter than EC90 SL, which I currently have. Was hoping I missed a gem.

My new bike will be BB30, so looks like S-Works PM would still be 25g lighter than this Quarq/Red setup. Red22 or SiSL2 with Assioma would be about the same compared to Quarq with Ti pedals.

[ryanw]

v2 vs the unicorn v1 model: