FSA stem options - confused / advice needed
Moderator: robbosmans
Hi,
I'm after a stem to match with FSA SL-K Compact 2019 carbon bars for my Cervelo R5. I'd like to use one from FSA to match, as the Cervelo 'Ultralight' alloy stem I already have is 182g! (100mm)
But... the SL-K 2019 is the heaviest one, and the cheapest option is the lightest! So perhaps there's more to this...
- SL-K 2019 ... 141g ... £100ish
- OS-99 CSI ... 126g ... £110
- Energy ... 113g ... £70
Any advice and experience of these much appreciated!
Cheers,
S
I'm after a stem to match with FSA SL-K Compact 2019 carbon bars for my Cervelo R5. I'd like to use one from FSA to match, as the Cervelo 'Ultralight' alloy stem I already have is 182g! (100mm)
But... the SL-K 2019 is the heaviest one, and the cheapest option is the lightest! So perhaps there's more to this...
- SL-K 2019 ... 141g ... £100ish
- OS-99 CSI ... 126g ... £110
- Energy ... 113g ... £70
Any advice and experience of these much appreciated!
Cheers,
S
Not FSA, but I've found the Scott / Syncros RR1.5 Stem (non-aero, note the non-std cap on both) to be clean/neutral looking and cheap. https://amzn.to/2UMB93Y They're probably 135g at that size, but only $25-50
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:18 pm
The first two are carbon wrapped around alloy, with the alloy stem inside providing most of the strength. The Energy is just alloy, and good alloy stems tend to be lighter than carbon wrapped alloy.
- Dan Gerous
- Posts: 2413
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:28 pm
The SL-K is not carbon wrapped, it's a chunky piece of forged then machined alloy stem but has a carbon faceplate. Maybe stronger/stiffer than the Energy but, more expensive construction and heavier.whyamihere wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 7:31 pmThe first two are carbon wrapped around alloy, with the alloy stem inside providing most of the strength. The Energy is just alloy, and good alloy stems tend to be lighter than carbon wrapped alloy.
If sticking with FSA is important, I'd take the Energy, or find a discontinued OS-99 (non-CSI), it was 100% alloy, ti bolts, close to 100gr but slightly less stiff in theory than the CSI version (it's basically the same stem without the extra layer of carbon). I can't feel much of a difference personally, might be more important for heavier riders and sprinters.
Last edited by Dan Gerous on Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6283
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
The carbon wrapped alu stems are not a good idea. The aluminium is thinner and the carbon wrap is so thin it easily cracks around bolt holes.
The last nail in the coffin is, they're not all stiffer. Quite the contrary and it have been tested!
The last nail in the coffin is, they're not all stiffer. Quite the contrary and it have been tested!
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Cheers - I checked out the non-carbon OS 99 though and I wouldn't be able to live with the red graphics (on a black/green frame)!Dan Gerous wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 7:48 pmThe SL-K is not carbon wrapped, it's a chunky piece of forged then machined alloy stem but has a carbon faceplate. Maybe stronger/stiffer than the Energy but, more expensive construction and heavier.whyamihere wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 7:31 pmThe first two are carbon wrapped around alloy, with the alloy stem inside providing most of the strength. The Energy is just alloy, and good alloy stems tend to be lighter than carbon wrapped alloy.
If sticking with FSA is important, I'd take the Energy, or find a discontinued OS-99 (non-CSI), it was 100% alloy, ti bolts, close to 100gr but slightly less stiff in theory than the CSI version (it's basically the same stem without the extra layer of carbon). I can't feel much of a difference personally, might be more important for heavier riders and sprinters.
If the CSI version is the same underneath I might go for that one. Lighter and (arguably) better looking thank the SL-K.
Thanks - have you tested the FSA one? It was noted above it's the same alu stem underneath, or is that not the case?wheelsONfire wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:15 pmThe carbon wrapped alu stems are not a good idea. The aluminium is thinner and the carbon wrap is so thin it easily cracks around bolt holes.
The last nail in the coffin is, they're not all stiffer. Quite the contrary and it have been tested!
It looks like they've been making this stem with carbon layer for over 10 years, so there must be something going for it...
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6283
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
Not FSA, had Ritchey WCS, the carbon wrapping cracked right away!
I wouldn't buy a second stem with design. Either alu or carbon.
I wouldn't buy a second stem with design. Either alu or carbon.
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
- Dan Gerous
- Posts: 2413
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:28 pm
Haaa but FSA and Ritchey are very different companies. I had a Ritchey stem once, threw it in the bin soon after (it was light but had microscopic soft alu bolts with poor tolerances and that oh so dumb 260 degree handlebar clamp), bad designs and executions IMO.
FSA is not the most fancy bling brand but in my experience, they make reliable products and have made carbon wrapped parts for a loooong time, and I have never seen/heard of one delaminating or having it's carbon crack despite being very popular (many OEM bikes came with these). I also have a FSA made seatpost that is carbon wrapped alloy and it's very well made, durable and it's still in use since 2005. I don't think carbon wrapped alloy offers much performance advantage but I wouldn't avoid it.
FSA is not the most fancy bling brand but in my experience, they make reliable products and have made carbon wrapped parts for a loooong time, and I have never seen/heard of one delaminating or having it's carbon crack despite being very popular (many OEM bikes came with these). I also have a FSA made seatpost that is carbon wrapped alloy and it's very well made, durable and it's still in use since 2005. I don't think carbon wrapped alloy offers much performance advantage but I wouldn't avoid it.
FSA made a lot of OE stems for Cannondale with green logos, if you hunt around you might be able to find one of those.
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6283
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
A thinner aluminium wall thickness wrapped with leaf thin carbon fiber, hasn't same stiffness as a solid aluminium stem.
Same goes for a solid wall carbon stem. There's no way around this.
Same goes for a solid wall carbon stem. There's no way around this.
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Get a Kalloy Uno 7. There's basically no rational reason to get any other type of stem
-
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:10 am
....and a good alternative for those, who need it customized for a more expensive bike,
https://www.benobikes.com/de/fahrrad-te ... bau-st-13/
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com