Road disc 160/160 vs 160/140mm in the mountains

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Post Reply
mrlobber
Posts: 1938
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:36 am
Location: Where the permanent autumn is

by mrlobber

There are numerous threads on road discs vs rim around here (and maybe the question on rotor sizes is buried inside them as well), but let's put that all aside for now.

Due to potential 20-30g savings, I'd be interested to swap rear to 140mm for my "light" disc bike. I live in a flat area, so I'd even be able to run 140mm rotors on road disc all day long, however, given the occasional trips to Alps, I'd like to hear real experiences from people who run road discs in mountains daily or weekly - how much rear 140mm reduces actual braking performance and/or time to heating the brakes up.

My weight is in the 70...75kg territory.
Minimum bike categories required in the stable:
Aero bike | GC bike | GC rim bike | Climbing bike | Climbing rim bike | Classics bike | Gravel bike | TT bike | Indoors bike

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12570
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

If you care about the weight, go ahead. You should only be feathering/trailing the rear a slight bit during aggressive descending. I just think the asymmetry looks goofy so I haven't bothered going 140mm in the rear.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



MarcFaFo
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:58 pm

by MarcFaFo

It is very common to use 160/140 set-up. Also in the mountains I have seen last summer during the Marmotte

siim
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:37 pm
Location: Estonia

by siim

I used 160/140 this year in Dolomites (Maratona) and it was absolutely fine. My weight is about the same as yours.

moyboy
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:19 am

by moyboy

I used 160 160 in the Dolomites (Maratona). I think 140 would work well too. you do not want to lock that rear!
I'm just a horrible descender!

Will be going to a 140 rear this year.
siim wrote:
Fri Nov 23, 2018 1:13 pm
I used 160/140 this year in Dolomites (Maratona) and it was absolutely fine. My weight is about the same as yours.

User avatar
tnkn
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:21 am
Location: Hampshire, UK
Contact:

by tnkn

I've used 160/140 in the mountains. Was absolutely fine at 68kg.

Not once did I think I needed more stopping power.

MichaelB
Posts: 996
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:31 am

by MichaelB

I use 160/140 on hills with no issue and I’m 95kg.
Mind you, run Zee calipers so a much bigger pad than the flat mount ones

Edit - damned phone auto correct!!
Last edited by MichaelB on Mon Nov 26, 2018 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

rainerhq
Posts: 898
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Estonia

by rainerhq

What about 140/140 for 67kg rider in the mountains?
"Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride"

mattr
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:43 pm
Location: The Grim North.

by mattr

Think you'll be into "how good is your technique" there.........

I switched from 180/160 to 160/140 on my XC bike, and while i didn't actually have any problems (the brakes still worked) i did manage to slightly over heat/heat treat the front disc, as far as i can tell, it's hit about 300-350 degrees in a few spots. Difficult to tell exactly due to the fact that it's a friction surface, but the arms were discoloured where they meet the friction surface.
The 180/160 combo i had on that bike prior to that have been on for several years with no issues (and no colouring of the disc at all.)

Best i've seen was a 200mm disc from a tandem that had overheated so badly it had permanantly distorted by about 10mm and was dark blue..........

nulldreiundreissig
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:13 am

by nulldreiundreissig

rainerhq wrote:
Mon Nov 26, 2018 6:33 am
What about 140/140 for 67kg rider in the mountains?
Sitting at 62kg and living in the Zurich-area with regular trips to alpine passes, I was torn between 140-140 and 160-140, too.
Went for 160-140 ultimately, because it’s only a few grams saved and I felt more comfortable with the option to choose 140s in a second stage.

I’d rather consider latex inner tubes on a disc equipped bike for some easy weight savings than probably sacrificing some breaking power.

spdntrxi
Posts: 5838
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:11 pm

by spdntrxi

Allroad 160/160
TriBike 160/140
Road 160/140

83kg.. no lack of power with the 140
2024 BMC TeamMachine R
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply