Trek emonda SLR10H2 VS CANYON ultimate Evo .
Moderator: robbosmans
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2018 6:51 pm
Which one to pick ?Im confuse a bit could you guys explain to me diffrences? Those two are a top of the shelves and im wondering on which frameset i should pick for sub 5 build.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Both come out of the same factory, Quest composites, and probably use a similar carbon grade to reach the weights advertised. Build quality will therefore be the same, so pick the one that has the features (see Alcatraz' post), geometry and finishing you like best.
-
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:59 am
The oversized steerer tube on the Canyon will limit your stem choices, but that would still be my pick.
Why H2, btw? If your main concern is weight, go ahead with H1.
You're right but the author is torn between Trek and Canyon. With BB86 I don't think so many can use a 30mm spindle crank comfortably. And Ultimate frameset comes with a weird seatpost which I fathom most people end up using.
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6294
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
PF 86 (Canyon as an example) is also not made for 30mm axle
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
wheelsONfire wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:29 pmPF 86 (Canyon as an example) is also not made for 30mm axle
My Wilier zero.6 uses PF 86 and I run a clavicula crankset on it - no issues. PF4130.
Speedplay is the devil!
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6294
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
Pressfit 46*30, would accept pressfit 46*24 also.
I haven't seen any 41*30 pressfit, but heard of. It seems those bearings should be pretty small?
Anyway, it's really idiotic to build a frame around 41mm as the bearings are not as durable as 46mm shell.
I haven't seen any 41*30 pressfit, but heard of. It seems those bearings should be pretty small?
Anyway, it's really idiotic to build a frame around 41mm as the bearings are not as durable as 46mm shell.
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
THM's own. I've heard rotor's sucks but Hope makes a decent one.wheelsONfire wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 9:26 pmPressfit 46*30, would accept pressfit 46*24 also.
What pressfit do you have when you fit a 30mm axle in a 41mm version?
I haven't seen any 41*30 pressfit, but heard of. It seems those bearings should be pretty small?
Anyway, it's really idiotic to build a frame around 41mm as the bearings are not as durable as 46mm shell.
Speedplay is the devil!
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6294
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
I guess it's made as a last resort option. But what the reason for going this route is i don't understand. It's many frames using 41* BBs.
When i look at a new frame, every option like this is off the list.
When i look at a new frame, every option like this is off the list.
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
In 4130 you press the bearings directly into the frame, so they are bigger than bsa bearings with outboard cupswheelsONfire wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 9:26 pmPressfit 46*30, would accept pressfit 46*24 also.
I haven't seen any 41*30 pressfit, but heard of. It seems those bearings should be pretty small?
Anyway, it's really idiotic to build a frame around 41mm as the bearings are not as durable as 46mm shell.
- wheelsONfire
- Posts: 6294
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
- Location: NorthEU
Aha, so the bearings are same size balls?
Looking at Campas (Ceramic speed) T45, it looks as a standard, with shell etc.
Looking at Campas (Ceramic speed) T45, it looks as a standard, with shell etc.
Bikes:
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Ax Lightness Vial EVO Race (2019.01.03)
Open *UP* (2016.04.14)
Paduano Racing Fidia (kind of shelved)
Ex bike; Vial EVO D, Vial EVO Ultra, Scott Foil, Paduano ti bike.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
I'm guessing pf41 (bb86) uses normal shimano standard bearings 24x37x7. Those leave 6.5mm for two races and balls.
4130 however can with bearings directly in the frame only do with 5.5mm for two races and balls.
However people do report no problems running 4130 so, there could be something new to learn about them. Interesting..
Maybe they run bearings in two tracks. That could help spread the load. Still a bit annoying that a bottom bracket might have crazy small bearings. Common sense tells me it needs to be built at a much higher standard to be as reliable as a common bearing.
4130 however can with bearings directly in the frame only do with 5.5mm for two races and balls.
However people do report no problems running 4130 so, there could be something new to learn about them. Interesting..
Maybe they run bearings in two tracks. That could help spread the load. Still a bit annoying that a bottom bracket might have crazy small bearings. Common sense tells me it needs to be built at a much higher standard to be as reliable as a common bearing.