Page 2 of 2

Re: Visual Geometry Comparison

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:05 pm
by topflightpro
ms6073 wrote:
Tue Oct 30, 2018 9:26 pm
Would be nice if the user could manually enter data for a non-listed bike, sort of a wiki style interface that way non-listed bikes are no longer an issue.
Try bikegeo.net

Re: Visual Geometry Comparison

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:05 pm
by Weenie

Re: Visual Geometry Comparison

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 5:01 pm
by Tychom
An older post on the forum got me thinking, a claim that with so many makes & models out there that there's a frame out there for everyone. That there's no need for anyone to go custom (yes there's a whole load of holes in that argument but anyway).

But that got me thinking, what would be an ideal feature for a site like this would be being able to do a reverse search - put in my desired stack and reach measurements and get a list of models that match within some tolerance window.

Re: Visual Geometry Comparison

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:17 pm
by crinale
is fork rake taken into consideration for visualizations?
do you attempt to calculate missing measurements? ie, if front centre isn't given, calculate it using wheelbase - chainstay
i know that bianchi is pretty bad at giving geometry, such as completely omitting fork specs, so i checked and see that there's a note that actual bike measurements were taken. how common is this process? who takes the measurements? how can you ensure accuracy?

Re: Visual Geometry Comparison

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 1:59 am
by xDOMx
topflightpro wrote:
Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:05 pm
ms6073 wrote:
Tue Oct 30, 2018 9:26 pm
Would be nice if the user could manually enter data for a non-listed bike, sort of a wiki style interface that way non-listed bikes are no longer an issue.
Try bikegeo.net
Thanks for posting this. Basic but very useful.