Page 4 of 4

Re: Rule #25: The bike(s) on top of your car should be worth more than the car

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 1:49 pm
by themidge
<-- Is that 2008 silver sram rival on the left-most bike?
Image
One of my favourite groupsets ever. Never ridden it, but it looks so good!

Edit: new page fail :?

Re: Rule #25: The bike(s) on top of your car should be worth more than the car

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:42 pm
by efeballi
Good eyes, that’s correct.
Pic’s from 2015. The bike was destroyed a month ago in a criterium in California.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Rule #25: The bike(s) on top of your car should be worth more than the car

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:42 pm
by Weenie

Re: Rule #25: The bike(s) on top of your car should be worth more than the car

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:34 pm
by spartacus
I think the alfa has stolen the thread

Re: Rule #25: The bike(s) on top of your car should be worth more than the car

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:33 am
by skidrrr
Image
When I have 3 bikes on top rule #25 is obeyed.

Re: Rule #25: The bike(s) on top of your car should be worth more than the car

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2018 1:47 pm
by mattr
I'll have to try and borrow a prototype from work and see if we can achieve this shitty rule.

Might need a bigger bike rack.
A really really big bike rack.

:wink: