11t were uncommon on 9sp road cassettes, only found on time trial corncobs and MTB. Compact wasn't even really a thing until 10sp had been out for a while. Pro cyclists in the Merckx era would run extra large chainrings when they felt like having higher gears. You can still find NOS 56t Campy NR rings around.ericoschmitt wrote: ↑Sat Nov 17, 2018 5:15 amThis debate about the usefulness of an 11t has been around since 9s days I think. But...
Well, at 50x11 110rpm you are at some 60kph (not looking at calc now) and any decent cyclist can sprint above 130rpm (thats close to 70kph on 50x11), so really, if you need taller gearing you must be a pro. Going downhill and you will be faster tucking.
Last year my top gear was 50x12 and I never got dropped because of it! Only because of not being fit, and that was on climbs... I usually was one of the fastest descenders, tucked, and I'm light.
Do you realise 50x10 equals 55x11 and 60x12? Thats HUGE. It's pointless even for many pros most of the time.
Merckx rode 52x13 as his top gear, and he would beat the shit out of everyone in this thread on his 9.5kg steel bike on box section rims 32 spokes. Does anyone here needs taller gears than Merckx had? Come on.
10t is total BS for road (not to mention those 9-32 cassettes).
I will keep choosing cassettes starting on 12t for 11s and wont get 12s groupsets while I can't get 12-something. 52x12 is an excelent top gear for me, and 30x29 (or 25, or 32) is an excelent bottom gear for wall-climbing.
Triples will rule the earth again, Jesus said.
You were right about triples though.