S-Works Venge 2019

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Stitchking
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 7:30 am

by Stitchking

Just showed our area shimano rep the seatpost and his response was "that's cool, but as soon as you forget to close that cover in crap weather; warranty claims"
kkibbler wrote:Very clever Di2 integration in the seatpost. Liking this much more than bar-end. Except for all the road gunk it will get there.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk


by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Nefarious86
Moderator
Posts: 3669
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 4:57 am

by Nefarious86

No different to anywhere else on the bike. If you're stupid enough to drown it then theres only one person to blame.. No doubt they would have been in consultation with Shimano over the placement of it due to how strict they are on supply limitations, who remembers SCS to get around their chainstay requirements?

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

Using Tapatalk

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12571
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

What's the benefit of that placement though. That location is definitely subject to a ton of spray if the road gets damp. What's wrong with an integrated downtube junction?

KotP
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:31 am

by KotP

kkibbler wrote:
Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:51 am
Very clever Di2 integration in the seatpost. Liking this much more than bar-end. Except for all the road gunk it will get there.
Don't worry, the saddle bag will shield it ;)

User avatar
TonyM
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:11 pm

by TonyM

I actually like the current Venge but this one looks even better!!
And much better than the Tarmac!

Andres
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:10 am

by Andres

endershan wrote:
Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:45 am
Looks like they used similar headtube routing design as BMC SLR01 Disc. Finger crossed for standard stem and bar support.
Looks like they're using a 31.8 bar with some wedges that gives it that massive airfoil look. Pretty clever if so.

REGICYCLE
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:48 pm
Location: The 'Rif

by REGICYCLE

Yep, it's a standard stem + aerofly bar, with some kind of fairing to fill in the gaps... Pretty neat solution to the adjustability problem of integrated bars

spdntrxi
Posts: 5839
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:11 pm

by spdntrxi

just tell me how much it weighs :)
2024 BMC TeamMachine R
2018 BMC TImeMachine Road
2002 Moots Compact-SL
2019 Parlee Z0XD - "classified"
2023 Pivot E-Vault

Digger90
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:34 pm

by Digger90

BSA 68mm BB - Yaaay! :D

Looks like we might be on the road to finally getting rid of that press-fit cr@p.

Broady
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:02 pm

by Broady

Looks very pedestrian compared to the old one, not necessarily a bad thing going by the weight and assembly 'quirks'. I'm sure it's superb though. Aero frames are definitely all following the same design cues nowadays, it must work I guess.

User avatar
Calnago
In Memoriam
Posts: 8612
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm

by Calnago

Nefarious86 wrote:No different to anywhere else on the bike. If you're stupid enough to drown it then theres only one person to blame.. No doubt they would have been in consultation with Shimano over the placement of it due to how strict they are on supply limitations, who remembers SCS to get around their chainstay requirements?

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
“SCS”... spell it out for me again. Is that where they had the proprietary hub requirements to accommodate for the revised chainline due to dropout width for discs? That wasn’t that long ago, right? Kind of like Cervelo’s proprietary cranks to accommodate for the revised chainline, except Cervelo changed things up front and Soecialized changed the rear. It’s getting harder and harder to keep track.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12571
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

Digger90 wrote:
Tue Jun 05, 2018 4:39 pm
BSA 68mm BB - Yaaay! :D

Looks like we might be on the road to finally getting rid of that press-fit cr@p.

The Specialized pro teams always get threaded BBs on their bikes. Consider it “pro issue” only.

Rest assured, they aren’t going to put BSA on a production bike when it needs to accommodate 30mm S-Works carbon cranks. They could install those oversized shitty external cups, but won’t.

ParisCarbon
Posts: 1929
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 5:39 am
Location: Winnipeg Canada

by ParisCarbon

TobinHatesYou wrote:
Tue Jun 05, 2018 6:32 pm
Digger90 wrote:
Tue Jun 05, 2018 4:39 pm
BSA 68mm BB - Yaaay! :D

Looks like we might be on the road to finally getting rid of that press-fit cr@p.

The Specialized pro teams always get threaded BBs on their bikes. Consider it “pro issue” only.

Rest assured, they aren’t going to put BSA on a production bike when it needs to accommodate 30mm S-Works carbon cranks. They could install those oversized shitty external cups, but won’t.
Hey guys,
Its not a threaded BB... its a ceramic speed outboard cup model for shimano cranks.. I have the exact same BB on my 2016 Sagan camo tarmac. Now saying not threaded, it does actually thread together in the middle since its 2 seperate pieces...

http://www.ceramicspeed.com/sport/produ ... ano%20Road

MRM
Posts: 532
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 8:15 pm

by MRM

Prefer my old one in terms of looks. Wonder if the new one gets down to 6.8 kg though?

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



dcorn
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:21 pm
Location: NoVA

by dcorn

Calnago wrote:
Tue Jun 05, 2018 5:00 pm
Nefarious86 wrote:No different to anywhere else on the bike. If you're stupid enough to drown it then theres only one person to blame.. No doubt they would have been in consultation with Shimano over the placement of it due to how strict they are on supply limitations, who remembers SCS to get around their chainstay requirements?

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
“SCS”... spell it out for me again. Is that where they had the proprietary hub requirements to accommodate for the revised chainline due to dropout width for discs? That wasn’t that long ago, right? Kind of like Cervelo’s proprietary cranks to accommodate for the revised chainline, except Cervelo changed things up front and Soecialized changed the rear. It’s getting harder and harder to keep track.
Yes. My Crux has a 12x135mm thru-axle and it was a huge PITA to get another wheelset. I even went back to Spesh to get a second set of stock wheels and they were sold out of literally every SCS wheelset they made, from $250 up to $2400. I had to buy the stock hubs and get wheels built or spend a fortune with Hope hubs. I told myself I didn't need another set of wheels for it, but then I went out and immediately sought one out.

Post Reply