Shimano R9150 RD - Why so few direct mount hangers?
Moderator: robbosmans
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
That's cool, I'm in a (slow) process of designing my own direct mount hanger for FM079. The hardest part so far has been reverse engineering dropout to hanger interface, I find curve approximation to be challenging without much prior CAD experience. Here's my workflow: scan both sides of hanger, luckily the shape allows for that; make as much reference measurements as possible, but in my case nothing except bolts/holes are good enough; design the thing as close as possible; print the model surfaces to paper, cut out, match to the original, tweak and repeat until satisfied with result (I'm here right now, with several iterations). Obviously, all hangers have different shape and idea behind them, but in my case I figured the replacement should match only bolt holes and QR shoulder because only dropout/endcap bear the actual load, you'd want an even surface there to distribute the it evenly. Am I correct in this assumption? Does this carry over to thru axle hanger (I started on that too, but the project stalled)?
I suppose it is made for the Pinarello Dogma F10, right?survivor wrote:Looks like Pinarello has made the direct mount hanger official via its MOST component.
http://www.mostbike.it/en/products/acce ... rect-mount
Can I also use it on a different bike, for example on a BMC Roadmachine?
-
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:00 am
No.
Each frame uses a specific interface and therefore specific hanger. There is some cross over but it’s so limited it’s not even a thing.
Jump on the wheels manufacturing website and look at the sheer number of different hangers and you’ll start to get an understanding for the lack of a standard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Each frame uses a specific interface and therefore specific hanger. There is some cross over but it’s so limited it’s not even a thing.
Jump on the wheels manufacturing website and look at the sheer number of different hangers and you’ll start to get an understanding for the lack of a standard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The latest BMC frames come with an extra Direct Mount hanger as far as I have seen.TonyM wrote: ↑Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:46 amI suppose it is made for the Pinarello Dogma F10, right?survivor wrote:Looks like Pinarello has made the direct mount hanger official via its MOST component.
http://www.mostbike.it/en/products/acce ... rect-mount
Can I also use it on a different bike, for example on a BMC Roadmachine?
And no, its frame specific.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:29 am
Nice! Are you going to make it for other model?
I am not sure whether it is compatible with the older model like the Pinarello Dogma F8.
I believe BMC Roadmachine already came with their specific direct mount hanger.
Sorry, no. No one would be willing to spend the amount that it would take to make it worthwhile.
Same here. In the process of making one for my bike. Unless one is talking about a batch production of at least 20, the costs are just not going to cut it for the casual buyer.
As long as the fixing screw holes are correctly located with respect to the QR axle cutout, and it fits in the frame then that should be all you need. It goes without saying that you need to properly locate the derailleur mounting hole an the little protrusion for the b-adjust screw. The friction created by the clamping of the QR is what actually holds everything in place. Of course, your surfaces need to be flat and perpendicular to the wheel axis.Klaster_1 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:05 amThat's cool, I'm in a (slow) process of designing my own direct mount hanger for FM079. The hardest part so far has been reverse engineering dropout to hanger interface, I find curve approximation to be challenging without much prior CAD experience. Here's my workflow: scan both sides of hanger, luckily the shape allows for that; make as much reference measurements as possible, but in my case nothing except bolts/holes are good enough; design the thing as close as possible; print the model surfaces to paper, cut out, match to the original, tweak and repeat until satisfied with result (I'm here right now, with several iterations). Obviously, all hangers have different shape and idea behind them, but in my case I figured the replacement should match only bolt holes and QR shoulder because only dropout/endcap bear the actual load, you'd want an even surface there to distribute the it evenly. Am I correct in this assumption? Does this carry over to thru axle hanger (I started on that too, but the project stalled)?
Thru axle hanger is the same way.
I notice you kept the semi circular ridge on the inside mounting face. Are you using that to deflect the incoming axle from dinging the underside of the dropout when mounting a wheel? Otherwise, it serves to no structural purpose, it only adds to the amount of material removed/machining costs.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
What's the final weight?
Even the hanger from Most (Pinarello) which doesnt seem to have big lighting effort can reduce some grams...
Even the hanger from Most (Pinarello) which doesnt seem to have big lighting effort can reduce some grams...