Short vs Medium Cage Rear Derailleur

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
User avatar
ultimobici
in the industry
Posts: 2990
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

by ultimobici

joeyb1000 wrote:Just switched Campy to medium cage (and 11-32):
1. The short cage can handle the 32 (including my EPS derailleurs), the issue is the large chainring and the 2nd cog. On the short cage, the chain is stretched to the limit.
2. I see no change in shift quality on any cassette.
3. The medium cage says it's for 29 or 32 cassettes only, but I have no problems on smaller cassettes.
4. I think the medium cage is quieter, but that's probably due to the new chain.
5. Campy's Potenza-grade cassette is slightly noisier than Chorus+ cassettes. It has a more metallic sound to it.
6. The new derailleur is the HO version. I can't see any difference


I'll post photos when I figure out how.
The HO mechs are slightly different with regard to the teeth on the jockey wheels. They’re slightly bigger teeth on one of the jockey wheels to help in cross chain situations.

WRT 11-32 and short cage, it may work “OK” but that is hugely dependant on the hanger length and stay length. Shifting will be degraded somewhere even if it is workable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

pdlpsher1
Posts: 1484
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:09 pm
Location: CO

by pdlpsher1

I just switched from DA 9070 Di2 to the Ultegra 8050 GS Di2 Long Cage derailleur. The cassette went from the Sram 1190 11-28 to the Ultegra 11-34. The new setup is heavier however I’m climbing faster and with less fatigue. 11-34 will now be my standard setup. By the way I have 50-34 front rings. I tested the new gearing on a climb that I do often. 2.9 mi at avg gradient of 7.9%. The new avg cadence is 85 vs 76. I didn’t use the 34 on the entire climb as the gradient varied throughout the climb. But the 34 allowed me to spin on several stretches where the gradient was above 10%. I also repeated the same climb three times without any fatigue.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

by Weenie


User avatar
Rick
Posts: 2021
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm

by Rick

pdlpsher1 wrote:
Sun Dec 24, 2017 5:05 pm
The cassette went from the Sram 1190 11-28 to the Ultegra 11-34. The new setup is heavier however I’m climbing faster and with less fatigue.
On the general subject of lower gears and climbing: Everyone ask yourself: If your best power cadence is 90 RPM (or 80, or 100...whatever) can you REALLY spin that cadence all the way up the steepest parts of your typical climbs ?
If not, why not? I don't think there is any shame in using really low gears. In the end, it is about doing what is best for YOU.
My best cadence seems to be on the very low side, but I live in an area with a lot of very steep, long climbs, and I can't really spin all the way up them even with the lowest gears available.
:cry:

AJS914
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:52 pm

by AJS914

Some of us have never had the opportunity to try the lowest gears available. I'm using a 34x29 because that was Campy's easiest combo until recently without going triple or Athena.

I've been considering going medium cage with a 32. Every time I've got a bigger cog in the rear I've enjoyed it and when the climbs aren't too steep I do like to spin at 90 rpms. I'll take that over grunting it out at 60 rpms any day.
The HO mechs are slightly different with regard to the teeth on the jockey wheels. They’re slightly bigger teeth on one of the jockey wheels to help in cross chain situations.
Are the HO mechs superseding everything that came before? I've been shopping for a Chorus medium cage rear and the cheapest ones I find don't indicate HO. Big deal? Should I pay $25 more for HO?

pdlpsher1
Posts: 1484
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:09 pm
Location: CO

by pdlpsher1

Rick wrote:
pdlpsher1 wrote:
Sun Dec 24, 2017 5:05 pm
The cassette went from the Sram 1190 11-28 to the Ultegra 11-34. The new setup is heavier however I’m climbing faster and with less fatigue.
On the general subject of lower gears and climbing: Everyone ask yourself: If your best power cadence is 90 RPM (or 80, or 100...whatever) can you REALLY spin that cadence all the way up the steepest parts of your typical climbs ?
If not, why not? I don't think there is any shame in using really low gears. In the end, it is about doing what is best for YOU.
My best cadence seems to be on the very low side, but I live in an area with a lot of very steep, long climbs, and I can't really spin all the way up them even with the lowest gears available.
:cry:
It sounds like you need to try a low gearing setup. A lower gearing allows you to produce power at a high level for a longer period. I truly believe a higher cadence increases efficiency and the benefits outweigh the weight disadvantage.

What is your current gearing setup, on the front and the rear? On my tandem I have a low gearing setup that is flawless in shifting performance. Ultegra shifters, Ultegra 8000 RD, 50/34 compact rings, and an XT 11-40 cassette. I’m sure you can climb any hill on that gearing on a normal bike.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

joeyb1000
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:37 pm

by joeyb1000

dmp wrote:
Sun Dec 24, 2017 4:36 am
Joey, you note the chain seems short when on the big chainring and the 2nd cog- does this imply the large chainring and 1st cog are unusable?
Any idea what the 11-32 would be like with a compact (50/34)? Would this problem be lessened?

I'm riding on 2014 SR (short cage, they didn't have a medium one then), with a compact and 12-29 cassette. This has been ok for me here in Colorado where we don't have too many climbs over 10% (they are certainly long, but not as steep), but riding in Israel this fall there were plenty of grades over 10%, with short stretches of over 15, and some particularly brutal switchbacks of 20+. I would have loved a 32 on the back, and would think about getting one for my next trip there if it all work with my current drivetrain.
My comment is specifically about a short cage/large chainring/second cog with the chain set according to spec for a 52/36.
I always though that you shouldn't ride in the large chainring and first cog.
I don't think there is any reason that you couldn't use a short cage and a 32, but you would want to avoid the strain of the first two cogs when in the largest chainring.

FYI, this is on a Colnago Extreme Power. Frames with a shorter dropout may not be as successful.

I have now ridden the medium cage with a range of cassettes. The shifting is as good (or maybe better) than the short cage.

The added noise of the Potenza cassette isn't noticeable out on the road ... at least by me.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post