Aero test. Trek Madone, Venge, Cervleo S5, Giant Propel & Canyon Aeroad

Discuss light weight issues concerning road bikes & parts.
User avatar
kgt
Posts: 6996
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Athens, Greece

by kgt

F10 has 'normal' tubes, exposed brakes and cables, non integrated cockpit, etc. etc. that's why the 'semi-aero' title. In TTs aerodynamics are important, of course, but there is not any non-aero TT frame to compare so... :)

sawyer
Posts: 4511
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Natovi Landing

by sawyer

kgt wrote:F10 has 'normal' tubes, exposed brakes and cables, non integrated cockpit, etc. etc. that's why the 'semi-aero' title. In TTs aerodynamics are important, of course, but there is not any non-aero TT frame to compare so... :)


No way are the tubes on the F10 "normal" ... c'mon look at it man ... kammtail tubes all the way ... ... it's an aero frameset ... and Froome has used a one piece integrated cockpit ... see below

You're right though that it doesn't have all the aero bells and whistles some bikes have, but it's not alone in that regard. The Canyon Aeroad doesn't have integrated aero brakes for example

Oh and look a super narrow aero handlebar for Froome also ... that guy cares about aero

The F10, no question, is an aero bike ...

http://road.cc/content/tech-news/225663 ... -dogma-f10
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:

by Weenie


User avatar
kgt
Posts: 6996
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Athens, Greece

by kgt

Ok, I guess it depends on what you call aero. Many frames have kammtail tubesets nowadays...
Froome does not always use the integrated cockpit btw, he didn't at the Vuelta.

cunn1n9
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 1:24 am

by cunn1n9

F8 was tested by Tour magazine in the wind tunnel as being as fast as S5, Venge and madone. F10 is faster than all these. Image



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
BeeSeeBee
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:00 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

by BeeSeeBee

Great to see kgt rehashing literally the same argument year after year :roll:
viewtopic.php?p=1262816#p1262816

sawyer
Posts: 4511
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Natovi Landing

by sawyer

kgt wrote:Ok, I guess it depends on what you call aero. Many frames have kammtail tubesets nowadays...
Froome does not always use the integrated cockpit btw, he didn't at the Vuelta.



See this crying face :lol:

Oh look, two wine glasses ... "cheers!" :beerchug:

A sign with the word "down" :up:

A thumbsdown :thumbup:

And this guy is so unfriendly .... :welcome:
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:

User avatar
kgt
Posts: 6996
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Athens, Greece

by kgt

My arguments are still relevant, thank you. :)

If you want to follow a marketing trend that tries to persuade you to replace your frame every six months in order to get the "more aero one" that's your problem. I just find it sad.

User avatar
Frankie - B
Administrator
Posts: 6685
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Location: Drenthe, Holland

by Frankie - B

to quote Ryan:

RyanH wrote:Why do the naysayers keep coming into this thread? Do they have some deep need to troll?

How annoying would it be if someone kept posting in every weight thread about how caring about bicycle weight is pointless since a 1kg drop in weight is less than 2% of total rider weight and who cares about 2% since psychologically you can overcome that 2% or you could just sweat a little longer or take a bigger crap in the morning or or...

At the end of the day, there's going to be a group of people that believe in aero, just as there are people that believe in religion or don't. It's absurd to keep belaboring the same point over and over and over again in every thread that pops up about aero.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk


You know who you are. please stop the debate for the sake of debate.

Thanks.
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'

User avatar
53x12
Posts: 3762
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Location: On the bike

by 53x12

https://youtu.be/neFnyAE_noQ


Just a cycling guy's channel on YT. Has good stuff. This episode he did an aero test between Evo vs Madone 9.
"Marginal gains are the only gains when all that's left to gain is in the margins."

thumper88
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:27 pm

by thumper88

jeffy wrote:what are the frame sizes, wouldn't be to difficult to use the same bars, and use different stem positions to get as close as possible to identical setup.

the jump up to the propel could easily be accounted for by rider position in the wind.



It remains odd... the gap from the Propel to the better finishers is higher than I'd have thought the difference between an aero bike and total non-aero one....

tikka
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 5:07 pm

by tikka

53x12 wrote:https://youtu.be/neFnyAE_noQ


Just a cycling guy's channel on YT. Has good stuff. This episode he did an aero test between Evo vs Madone 9.
So.... the aero bike "saves" 10 seconds for every 10 minutes of riding or so.

So on my 3hr weekend outing, I would get home 3 minutes earlier if I had the aero bike!

Might be a deciding factor for some, and that's fine, but for 90% of amateur riders who don't race this supports just riding what you feel best on and brings you most joy, aero or not.



Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

AJS914
Posts: 2370
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:52 pm

by AJS914

Yes, exactly. I'd say 99% of riders. It's not worth running out and buying a new bike for but if you are shopping anyway, it's something to consider.

I do wonder how much the integrated cockpit accounts for the savings. Could I save 5 seconds on my Colnago C59 by installing an integrated aero bar/stem?

Then there is also the cheaper things you can do: aero wheels, aero helmet, tight fitting jersey, shoe covers, do core work and lower your stem, etc.

User avatar
53x12
Posts: 3762
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Location: On the bike

by 53x12

tikka wrote:
53x12 wrote:https://youtu.be/neFnyAE_noQ


Just a cycling guy's channel on YT. Has good stuff. This episode he did an aero test between Evo vs Madone 9.
So.... the aero bike "saves" 10 seconds for every 10 minutes of riding or so.

So on my 3hr weekend outing, I would get home 3 minutes earlier if I had the aero bike!

Might be a deciding factor for some, and that's fine, but for 90% of amateur riders who don't race this supports just riding what you feel best on and brings you most joy, aero or not.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk



That comes out to about 62s saved over 40km. I get it, you are an amateur and don't race. Why ride any kind of fancy bike. Might as well go down to a yard sale and get a $100 rusty bike, since you don't race and going any faster would be wasted for your slow ride on the bike path.

There are members on here that race. There are members on here that do fast group rides. There are members on here that enjoy going after Strava segment KOM.
"Marginal gains are the only gains when all that's left to gain is in the margins."

User avatar
wheelsONfire
Posts: 2060
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am
Location: NorthEU

by wheelsONfire

If it is for training only, wouldn't it be better using a bike that offers less benefit?
Possibly none against the top race bikes?
This seems to give you better training.
OFF TOPIC, but i noted riding a gravel with 650B 50-52mm tires 2 seasons, made me ride a road bike faster than before.
Bikes:

Ax Lightness Vial EVO D
Paduano Racing Fidia
Open *UP*
https://opencycle.com/showcase/the-xplo ... eelsonfire

by Weenie


3Pio
Posts: 901
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:13 pm

by 3Pio

tikka wrote:
53x12 wrote:https://youtu.be/neFnyAE_noQ


Just a cycling guy's channel on YT. Has good stuff. This episode he did an aero test between Evo vs Madone 9.
So.... the aero bike "saves" 10 seconds for every 10 minutes of riding or so.

So on my 3hr weekend outing, I would get home 3 minutes earlier if I had the aero bike!

Might be a deciding factor for some, and that's fine, but for 90% of amateur riders who don't race this supports just riding what you feel best on and brings you most joy, aero or not.



Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk



And the absurd is that in area where im riding a lot of guys buying more AERO, but using wider handlebars in same time. Im using NON Aero bike, but switched to narrower handlebar.. What do u think which is more Aero in the wind?Why i cant see the AERO frame guys have some advantage compared with me?

Also the faster rider here was using Bianchi Oltre XR2 and switched to S-Works SL5. .And he is even faster then he was (not because of frame, but because of his training...) Second faster guy ride Non Aero ORBEA frame (he dont train that much, but somehow naturally is really fast..) Third one riding non Aero Giant...


And the weight maybe it's marketing as well, but at least i can really feel it on the wheels or at least can measure my self (so having some satisfaction about that).

AERO is something u should believe what they claim and for me it's jurt marketing.. Dont make any sense.. The biggest frontal area in the wind is the rider him self. He'll safe more in Aero term, if he improve flexibility to be able to ride lower, and narrower vs buying most "Aero" bike..

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post