tguillaume wrote:[url=https://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=659467Tarmac5.jpg][/u]
Nice bike - did you get an accurate weight for the Fulcrum wheels? Ta
Moderator: robbosmans
tguillaume wrote:[url=https://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=659467Tarmac5.jpg][/u]
CrankAddictsRich wrote:rsantos450 wrote:For all around wheels, the CLX50 aren´t too tall?
I ride 60's as all around wheels and don't find them too tall. I think it really comes down to the rider, the normal wind conditions in the areas and how heavy the rider is. If you're 120 pounds, and the area is windy, 50's will probably be a handful.
liam7020 wrote:tguillaume wrote:[/u]
Nice bike - did you get an accurate weight for the Fulcrum wheels? Ta
rsantos450 wrote:CrankAddictsRich wrote:rsantos450 wrote:For all around wheels, the CLX50 aren´t too tall?
I ride 60's as all around wheels and don't find them too tall. I think it really comes down to the rider, the normal wind conditions in the areas and how heavy the rider is. If you're 120 pounds, and the area is windy, 50's will probably be a handful.
I'm 130 pounds, and i like to climb, the area is not very windy, but sometimes it is, what solutions for the wheels?? My frame is 49, i think the clx32 is too short, and the clx50 too tall, 38 or 40 i think will give a great look, and will be versatile to all terrains.
Suggestions??TonyM wrote:I personally think the 50mm esthetically suit the Tarmac very well. But for climbing the 32s could be the best option if you go for the CLX. Otherwise go for another brand [emoji6]
rsantos450 wrote:Suggestions??TonyM wrote:I personally think the 50mm esthetically suit the Tarmac very well. But for climbing the 32s could be the best option if you go for the CLX. Otherwise go for another brand
Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using Tapatalk
oreoboreo wrote:Picture of a 49cm? with the new seat stays does it look odd?
DCcyclist wrote:Alpine318is wrote:I can't wait for the disc version of this to come out.
Any expected date?