Sent from my Redmi 4 using Tapatalk
FAILURE Shimano Cranksets
-
1swiftvelo
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:37 pm
- Location: NC
Replaced one two weeks ago for a client for the same thing. It's not the first was ultergra
These always happen in Taiwan :
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=316&t=4849613
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=316&t=4849613
That's impressive! Though given the sheer number of 6800 chain sets out there the failure rate must be microscopic still,
Ref Taiwan, are you thinking that lightweight Aluminium chain sets have more of a weakness in countries that are very hot and very wet?
Ref Taiwan, are you thinking that lightweight Aluminium chain sets have more of a weakness in countries that are very hot and very wet?
-
victorduraace
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:10 pm
Must be something in glue/bonding method susceptible to failure in wet and hot conditions
-
prendrefeu
- Posts: 8634
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
But that's impossible! Shimano components are infallible and perfect!
That must be photoshop!
(sarcasm)
That must be photoshop!
(sarcasm)
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.
The new crank arm on the right looks good. But the pedal looks like garbage. Does this rider drag the bike for hours every day with the pedal in gravel? How does a pedal get to look like that? Broken crank on left. Breaking the tip of the rank off is not good. But the whole crank arm looks like he dipped it in acid every day for a year and pounded on it with a hammer and roughed it up with a grinder. The chainring looks like it is sort of newish. But the crank arm? No wonder it broke. Despite the broken crank arm, this is a much better picture of bike part abuse and how to destroy bike parts. I would never blame Shimano for this.
-
prendrefeu
- Posts: 8634
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
^^^^^^
Now that's sarcasm!
Now that's sarcasm!
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.
The crank arm on the right is the front half of the hollowtech forging. The left hand is the inside/back half of the forging.
You'd need the parts in front of you to work out the actual failure mode.
But, at a guess, I'd put this at shimanos door. Probably a slip up in the forging process .
You'd need the parts in front of you to work out the actual failure mode.
But, at a guess, I'd put this at shimanos door. Probably a slip up in the forging process .
It's just cosmetic.
Colnago C64 - The Naked Build; Colnago C60 - PR99; Trek Koppenberg - Where Emonda and Domane Meet;
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
Unlinked Builds (searchable): Colnago C59 - 5 Years Later; Trek Emonda SL Campagnolo SR; Special Colnago EPQ
RussellS wrote:The new crank arm on the right looks good. But the pedal looks like garbage. Does this rider drag the bike for hours every day with the pedal in gravel? How does a pedal get to look like that? Broken crank on left. Breaking the tip of the rank off is not good. But the whole crank arm looks like he dipped it in acid every day for a year and pounded on it with a hammer and roughed it up with a grinder. The chainring looks like it is sort of newish. But the crank arm? No wonder it broke. Despite the broken crank arm, this is a much better picture of bike part abuse and how to destroy bike parts. I would never blame Shimano for this.
You say some very strange things..............
