Obvoiusly your intelligence is parking on place for challenged ( you behave ike you didn't understood a single word from my previous posts, so blame yourself for my impression ) ; so last time, simple words, no logic required, nor thinking- maybe you'll get it (?) : or you you act like dumb intentionally , or trolling. So I'll feed the troll one time only.
If you have Wilier : IMAGE. Otherwise you're ... yes : liar. 2013-2015 model Wilier Cento Uno SR (which I had)
has UNIQUE bottom bracket designed for WILIER CUPS ONLY ( not integrated Campa cups+ bearings for HT2 like OLD Wiliers, NOT BB86 like newest ones
) . Standard cups are INCOMPATIBLE with it ( shell is narrower by 1.2mm ) , so it's not BB386Evo, it's Wiliers variation of it ( to narrow shell( width ) to wide shell (ID ).
Those WILIER cups on all 101 SR frames I had has been SLIP IN instead of PRESS FIT, as it should be. To wide shell even for their standard. Cups are from delrin, so try to "glue" delrin. Good luck. Delrin is designed to be PRESSED in ( vide bb86 ) . On ALL frames same issue.
ON ALL frames of 101SR I had, installed Di2 RD adjusted all steps outward and WITHOUT HIGH LIMIT SCREW was unable to shift to smallest cog. jockey wheel was placed under 2nd smallest cog and not even 1 mm further outward. 10 spd instead of 11... Same Di2 worked flawlessly on 2 other frames, incl 1 Wilier.
On one of them Ritchey topper didn't fit to seatmast : seatmast was wider/ thicker than it should be on all length( 0.9mm difference on 2.1mm wall thickness ) : assembly of seatmast was impossible.
ALL THOSE ISSUES APPLY TO FRAMES WHICH I HAD ONLY . NOT TO OTHERS, NOT TO OLDER NOR CURRENT MODELS. AND NOT TO COLNAGO ( got it finally ??? )
MY OTHER 2 WILIERS DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUES, ARE SIMPLY FABULOUS. AGAIN : MY COMPLAIN APPLIES FOR ONLY 101SR WHICH I HAD . Anyway , to much issues for 2600€ frame and such reputable manufacturer. ( and don't even try to think that anyone with IQ higher than tomato would believe that I "hit" few times faulty frame... and all the rest are perfectly fine ... sure
Overall big disappointment on Wilier nr3 of mine...
This leads me to simple conclusion : considering it's serial prodcuction, and frames I had has serial numbers far from each other says to me it's design issue ( Di2 ) and QC issue ( BB+ topper ) . Knowing that even UHC team had Di2 on TT bikes ONLY, not on 101SR road ( same model as mine ) , says to me it could be ( ok, i'm sure it is ) same issue( di2 incompatibility )- or someone can deeply believe that UHC haven't enough €/$ to have Di2 everywhere
That what you wrote, you wrote about YOUR ( mystic) frame and "knowledge" from the net ( bb386 design process ) . I wrote about MY EXPERIENCE and TAKEN MESUREMENTS with several frames of same model from same manufacturer.
/ Bianchi & BH BB386evo is REAL BB386 Evo btw / .
Believe or not / IDGAS / I have Wilier with BB386 logo on DT and BSA bottom bracket. Frame from authorised dealer, registered at Wiier for extended warranty ( legit- no doutbs ) . So don't trust every marketing crap which Wilier "sells" you... . Oficially and in all catalogs it's.. BB386 ( their naturally ) - again, I can only suspect why they did it, no proof, so I'll be quiet.
Last thing : on those frames other RD worked, however were at or almost at the end of the "high limit" ( even record which has widest range between limits from all systems ) .
BTW , I'll be VERY gratefull if someone could prove I'm totally wrong or got so much luck that get the "only di2 incompatible " frames in the Wilier whole history, and show me image ( link ) with 101SR 2013-2015 ( integrated seatmast , model used by UHC in white paint scheme) with Shimano Di2 ( some team bike, "on the road" image - anything indicating it works - in shop images I have no trust recently . On PM please ( just in case ) , for me it's EOT. NFA.