How is that a negative claim? If anything it was meant as a praise to Trek. Oh and the "100x" is clearly a hyperbole, you can look it up.Noctiluxx wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 6:17 pmSo you don't like reading negative comments without substantiation but ok with throwing out unsubstantiated claim of Trek spending 100x Canyon in R&D?robeambro wrote: ↑Sun Aug 05, 2018 1:00 pmWhat do you mean "you don't see it"?
Aside from Trek's IsoSpeed, I find it very difficult to find ANY road bikes where you can "see" any special engineering or R&D. They all have some slightly different shaping and will tell you that their research has found out that blah blah.
To go back to the original question, what is that "you don't see"?
That being said, I'm sure Trek spends 100x times what Canyon does in R&D. I just don't enjoy reading negative comments without substantiation.
If you want to flame, I'm sure there's plenty of other discussions.