USA amateur racing does not follow UCI regs except for a few championship events.
- Posts: 5428
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
- Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
https://s3.amazonaws.com/USACWeb/forms/rules/2014-USAC-Rulebook.pdf pp. 35-36 wrote:(e) Bicycles must meet current UCI technical regulations at events that select 17-18, U23 and Elite riders for international competition or national teams. All bicycles used in National Championships (for age 17 and older riders) and NRC races must comply with the current UCI regulations. At the discretion of USA Cycling, UCI rules may be adopted or modified for Masters National Championships.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/USACWeb/forms/rules/2014-USAC-Rulebook.pdf p. 43 wrote:a) For Olympic and other international events, and the activities of UCI teams, the applicable regulations of the UCI shall take precedence over USA Cycling regulations.
(b) National Championships for 17-18, U23 and professional riders will be run under UCI rules, except as specifically noted elsewhere in these rules. At the discretion of USA Cycling, other races for 17-18, U23 or professional riders that are used to qualify riders for national teams or international competition may use UCI rules, either completely or in part.
(c) These Racing Rules apply to all races authorized by USA Cycling, including national championships.
(d) Whenever a specific rule is in conflict with a more general rule, the specific rule takes precedence.
(e) Exceptions to these rules may be made only with prior approval of the CEO in a particular race event. A request for exception should be made in writing to the CEO.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/USACWeb/forms/rules/2014-USAC-Rulebook.pdf p. 130 wrote:6F1. Bicycles and Wheels used in competition in all collegiate road events (criteriums, time trials, road races, etc) must conform to the current UCI regulations for mass-start legal bicycles and wheels. The UCI maintains a website with the information of approved wheels.
Proportionality is tricky because to what should the weight limit be proportional?
I like the idea of just going to a safety spec. At the finish, they drop everyone's bike from 3 meters and they still need to be rideable .
That will be a barrier to entry for smaller manufacturers. Only large companies will be able to get their equipment used in races. Keep in mind that in many places even low level amateurs bikes must meet UCI regs as their national associations blindly follow the UCI.
For this reason, even though a safety spec makes more sense from an engineering perspective I'd prefer a lower weight limit.
Given parts have to be made available to the public they have to be safe
If you remove weight completely you will end up with hugely expensive (if they are still required to be available to the public) sub 500g framesets, 600g wheelsets etc.
Bottom line - pro level bikes will be unavailable to all but the deepest pockets
Who here wants that?
I do favour a reduction in 6.8kg as it would help stimulate WW part development, though it should be incremental - take it down to 6.3kg for a few years and see how it goes. Remember that aerodynamics etc have benefited from the headroom 6.8kg gives
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!!
- Similar Topics
- Last post
- 71 Replies
- 7906 Views
Last post by bearsdidit
Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:12 pm
- 7 Replies
- 1352 Views
Last post by mattr
Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:58 pm
- 21 Replies
- 1389 Views
Last post by alcatraz
Fri May 04, 2018 2:38 pm
- 33 Replies
- 1971 Views
Last post by mustafah009
Mon Mar 05, 2018 11:02 am
- 3 Replies
- 655 Views
Last post by FIJIGabe
Mon Aug 07, 2017 5:04 pm