Hope this helps.
If I am not suppose to share this, please inform me and I will delete it.
2013 Parlee Z1 with DA 9070
2013 Lynskey Helix OS II with SRAM Red
@Crossifino: I know I promised you a pic of my 61 C59 with the seat at your height. I'll try to get that done today sometime. If not, keep bugging me by PM till I do it for you.
The cad drawing shows a lower headset cup that I think is adding to the 617mm stack height shown in the diagram. I know this is the third time I've said this in this thread, but I've still yet to see an official stack height on the C59 anywhere. If it is 617 that's great, but I have no way to measure this.
As a comparison, here's my C59 as it sits now, with a saddle height of what I call 810mm, measure to a straight edge across the top. There's about a 5mm gap between the bottom of the straight edge and the dip of the saddle so you could say it's 805mm to the lowest point of the saddle. @Crossifino, this is probably something to consider since you use a saddle with a very big "dip" in the middle so adjust accordingly.
My C59 as I ride it currently with an 805mm saddle height:
Same bike with the saddle jacked up to 855mm, @Crossifino's saddle height:
A pic with my straight edge on the saddle which I use for measurement of saddle height and angle:
Closeup to show the "gap" between the straight edge, versus the actual height I sit at... 810mm to the straight edge, 805mm to the saddle dip where I sit.
Closeup of the stem area:
Closer view of how much I raised the saddle (bottom edge of yellow tape is where it was before raising for photo):
Ok... so in summary...
Up to you I guess... you know your fit better than me. Doesn't look extreme in the photo, but in reality I would need a step ladder to climb up there .
I am using a 130mm -6 degree stem with a 3mm spacer underneath the stem and the 16mm tall top cover provided prior to the Acros headsets they're using in 2013. Given that here's some measurements as shown for what you propose:
Saddle height: 855mm
Saddle to handlebar drop: 159mm (see note below).
Saddle setback: 112mm
Distance from tip of saddle to bars (next to stem center): 647mm
Regarding drop, you said you'd be using the deda stem with a -8 degree rise. That will increase the saddle to bar drop by ~5mm over a -6 degree stem of the same length. Plus, I have a 3mm spacer and the older top cover which is taller than the Acros they now provide (but let's ignore the top cap difference for now since I don't know it exactly). So, if you did "slam" the stem you're looking at saddle to handlebar drop of 159+5+3= 167mm. In my mind that is a pretty big drop so I hope your arms are long as you say and you're comfortable with that. Again, you know your fit best.
Oh yeah, stack and reach for @tinozee: Stack: 609mm, Reach: 410mm measured to the center of the headtube flush with the top headset cup. This does not include any headset cover tops, which can vary.
Hope it all helps. Have fun!
Sometimes I bite off more than I should. Oh well... if it helps someone get it right... I'm happy. I know I was the same way.
But seriously, you raise a good point Elliot, there is a whole cottage industry of so called fit techniques and methodologies. I've studied most of them, and at the end of the day... you know what, a good fitter can do it all by eye. Period. End of story. The rest is a bunch of hocus pocus and mumbo jumbo mostly contrived so that the fittee can feel good about paying large sums of money to get a "professional fit". All the measuring etc., is really only useful after the fact; when have actually already been lucky enough to find that good fit and are now in a position to record it so you can duplicate it again. It's just about being balanced on the bike. In fact, if a person when to three different fit experts I would put money down that they would come away with three different fit measurements. And they would probably all be good starting points. Then trial and error takes over in order to fine tune it as it's up to the rider to decide how he would like to tinker with that initial assessment. The body is remarkably adaptable. There's no harm in experimenting a bit.
But I applaud people who actually go through these kind of exercises as it helps to understand what is going on with the geometries of different bikes. Can we get carried away with all of it? Of course. Have we? Probably, but it beats trying to fix all the world's problems in one day.
At least, that's my view of it all.
It looks pretty similar setup to what I have now...
I am going to run the numbers over tonight when I get home, I do take your point regarding the -8 degree stem hence my conundrum but this gives me something to work with..
- Similar Topics
- Last post
- 752 Replies
- 58490 Views
Last post by KotP
Tue May 15, 2018 3:13 am
- 0 Replies
- 545 Views
Last post by si w
Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:37 pm
- 3 Replies
- 1980 Views
Last post by jin28h
Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:40 am
- 31 Replies
- 3878 Views
Last post by wallymann
Sun Jan 21, 2018 3:48 pm
- 23 Replies
- 2026 Views
Last post by GonaSovereign
Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:31 pm