Page 1315 of 1889

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:58 pm
by hansonator69
Image

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 5:54 pm
by Antoine
nice win by T.Gallopin in San Sebastian. He was not good during the Tour because of injuries sustained earlier in the season, same for T.Voeckler.
It shows the difficulty for a pro to be at their best at the right time.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 5:54 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:11 pm
by petepeterson
shave optional wedding!

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 9:48 pm
by pastronef
remember when someone stole Porte's shoe?

https://twitter.com/Guyanais31/status/3 ... 40/photo/1

maybe it's just a joke...

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:36 pm
by djconnel
"Attractivity" classification in Tour of Poland. (contributing time bonuses to GC)

No doubt a competition where riders pose shirtless and flex in front of judges.... beta-testing and idea to give Froome some competition in the Tour next year.

added: What a profoundly stupid idea. It attempts to turn stage races into a points race. They don't even do the points correctly. If there's a tie for first the points should go 25-25-10, not 30-30-10. Or better yet 0-0-0, and leave GC as it is.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 11:52 pm
by SvenNijs
petepeterson wrote:shave optional wedding!

Looks like even Bernie has a "Kittel Cut" now...

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 12:15 am
by Tapeworm
Re: wedding pic.
Damn, those ultra lean arms and frame look good.
And the chick ain't bad either.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 12:19 am
by HammerTime2
Can we cut the wedding and fashion cr@p, and get back to doping?

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:13 am
by Ghost234
Did I read the results correctly for the Tour of Poland? Did Wiggins really finish 9 1/2 minutes down?

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:25 am
by stella-azzurra
That would be yes. Vincenzo might be saving himself for the Vuelta.

Notably absent from the pointy end of the race were Vincenzo Nibali (Astana) and Bradley Wiggins (Sky), both competing for the first time since the Tour of Italy.

53 Zdenek Stybar (Cze) Omega Pharma-Quick Step 0:09:13
54 Kevin De Weert (Bel) Omega Pharma-Quick Step
55 Jose Rodolfo Serpa Perez (Col) Lampre-Merida
56 Robert Vrecer (Slo) Euskaltel-Euskadi
57 Serge Pauwels (Bel) Omega Pharma-Quick Step
58 Bradley Wiggins (GBr) Sky Procycling
59 Ben Swift (GBr) Sky Procycling
60 Vincenzo Nibali (Ita) Astana Pro Team

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:31 pm
by djconnel
Wiggins looks like he's gained a good deal of weight.... which means he looks almost normal.

I'm surprised there hasn't been more reaction to the proposal that 30, 20, and 10 second time bonuses be issued each day based on KOM and sprint points. This would profoundly change pro racing, which is elegant in its simplicity. Bonuses from intermediate sprints turns it into less of a race, more of a game.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:44 pm
by tymon_tm
IMO time bonuses, both awarded at intermediate sprints/KOMs and at finish line, make for less interesting racing

1. you'd have to follow the whole stage, preferably with a GC chart, taking notes etc, to fully 'understand' what's going on, and who's up to what
2. cyclists tend to wait till the finish line (or intermediate sprint) because making the difference earlier on by getting into a break etc is no longer required to win a race

edit: as for the first point, that includes commentators too, who are often hopelessly lost in the current GC/stage situation and fail to guide the viewers even through a boring flat stage

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:23 pm
by airwise
KWalker wrote:Froome is on standard O Sys rings- you can tell just by looking at the crank and shape of the rings.


I can't and I have a set on the bike next to me. Are you sure? Where do you get your information? Custom here would be derived from polar pattern tests. Are you familiar with those?

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:51 pm
by 53x12

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:14 pm
by Tapeworm
But he cried (again), so it doesn't actually count.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:14 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com