"PRO" Cycling Discussion

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderator: Moderator Team

User avatar
stella-azzurra
Posts: 5072
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Location: New York

by stella-azzurra

savechief wrote:
djconnel wrote:On the feed: define "take a feed".


I have no idea what the actual rule states, but it seems as if the important part of the "feed" is the part where it actually may help you. You know, the part where you ingest the item in question. I could take 50 gel packs at an illegal time during a race, but unless I eat them, they're going to do nothing but slow me down.

I know, logic has no place in writing some cycling rules.


Chris Froome (Team Sky) has been penalised 20 seconds by the Tour de France race judges after the stage to Alpe d'Huez for illegally taking an energy bar from the team car in the final kilometres of the stage.

Under UCI race rules, feeding from a team car is only allowed before the final part of a stage for road safety reasons. For the finish on Alpe d'Huez, feeding was banned six kilometres from the finish. However Froome became desperate about taking on some fuel in the final five kilometres of the climb, and ate some food that teammate Richie Porte had collected from the team car.

The Australian was also penalised 20 seconds according to an official race communiqué. Team Sky directeur sportif Nicolas Portal was also penalised. He was fined 1000 Swiss francs. Froome and Porte were fined 200 Swiss francs.


-cyclingnews
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree

by Weenie


User avatar
Kermithimself
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm
Location: Denmark

by Kermithimself

stella-azzurra wrote:Is this statement true? This would be the second time around up Alpe D"huez.

It took Contador 41:52 to climb Alpe d'Huez and he crossed the line two minutes down on Rodriguez and Quintana and a little over a minute behind Froome and Porte.

-cyclingnews

Froome rode just about 40.56, so that doesn't seem far off with Contador losing about a minute on the climb.
------------
If you dream of being famous - think of what birds do to statues.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kermithimself/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdCPaXwpeXT_LpuEF0REjqw
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gotlegscycling/

dereksmalls
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:20 pm
Location: New Zealand

by dereksmalls



Even though they are having fun and getting in the spirit of the day, if I was in the pelaton, there is no way I would take anything off a fan on the side of the road, who knows what the F*ck could be in that bottle/cup? Tacks on the road, piss in a bottle, punch in the guts, what's next? LSD, ecstacy, cocaine, testosterone, PEDs in a bottle - then bang! fail a test or die even. The public are getting more amilicious as time goes on it's just too damn risky!
Last edited by dereksmalls on Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

From Twitter:

Alpe d'Huez (13.8 km, 8.11 %):
Quintana: 39:50
Rodriguez: 39:53
Porte, Froome: 40:56
Valverde: 41:00
Nieve, Fuglsang, Contador: 41:53

Quintana 39:50 Alp d'Huez in #TDF today. VAM 1686 m/h, Dr F ± 6.00 W/kg. That's good for 37th all-time. More later (via @ammattipyoraily)

Alpe d'Huez (13.80 km, 8.11 %):2008 | Chris Froome: 51 min 13 sec. 2013 | Chris Froome: 40 min 56 sec.

Alpe d'Huez (13.80 km, 8.11 %). Chris Froome ["67 kg]: 40:56. DrF: 5.84 W/kg, CPL: 5.87 W/kg. BCR: 5.94 W/kg. rst: 5.96 W/kg.

Alpe d'Huez (13.80 kkm, 8.11 %, 1119 m). Andrew Talansky: 42 min 27 sec, 19.51 Kph, VAM 1582 m/h, 5.63 W/kg [DrF]

etc....

Routier
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 9:21 am
Location: UK

by Routier

JackL wrote:Quintana's clear sunglasses? Anybody know?


Adidas

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

Top times listed on Wikipedia

"The Look" = 38:01 would have made Quintana look silly.

DanW
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 5:39 pm
Location: Here, there and everywhere

by DanW

Funny also that Riis would have beaten everyone in his day too ;)

Clubagreenie
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:37 am
Location: Perth W.A

by Clubagreenie

Liggero wrote:Nobody dopes (LOL).

I´m extremely happy to see how TJ Van Garderen loses the stage in the final kilometers. I´m always happy when an american loose. TJ is so overated.



This is a fairly insipid statement, race and culture should be left aside and the only race and culture discussed being the Tour and the culture of France .. which so many happily soak up.
If you choose not to like someone , that is fine , but you dislike that person ....WTF has their country of origin, colour of their skin , accent , got to do with it?
2012 KUOTA KOM Team Edition Campag SR11 .....My mistress
2012 RIDLEY HELIUM being built up ....

Ghost234
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:21 am

by Ghost234

Those are wicked fast times up the climb... those push the records for the fastest "clean" times ever. Looking at the wiki times and the names without any doping convictions:

Iban Mayo - 39:06 - 2003
Jose Azevedo - 39:21 - 2004
Miguel Indurian - 39:28 - 1995
Carlos Sastre - 39:31 - 2008
Giani Bungo 39:44 - 1991
Miguel Indurian - 39:45 - 1991

Was there a tailwind?

milroy
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:37 am

by milroy

dereksmalls wrote:Even though they are having fun and getting in the spirit of the day, if I was in the pelaton, there is no way I would take anything off a fan on the side of the road, who knows what the F*ck could be in that bottle/cup? Tacks on the road, piss in a bottle, punch in the guts, what's next? LSD, ecstacy, cocaine, testosterone, PEDs in a bottle - then bang! fail a test or die even. The public are getting more amilicious as time goes on it's just too damn risky!



They should have copped a fine and 20 sec penalty for an illegal feed.

User avatar
kbbpll
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:56 am

by kbbpll

Just watching the replay, and on the first Alpe d'Huez climb, at 61.6km to go, Voigt looks down, reaches over, and pulls a plastic bag or some other crap out of Riblon's rear brake. The aero and weight difference insured the victory. Plus, pretty classy.

(Experts - how can I capture this from the video as one of these animated picture thingies?)

User avatar
elviento
Posts: 1235
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry
Contact:

by elviento

Instead Postal paid 7-figure...

KWalker wrote: ... Postal didn't pay domestiques 6 figure salaries...
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

User avatar
kbbpll
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:56 am

by kbbpll

The 20 second feeding penalty reminds me of the UK bank money laundering penalties. Surely Froome gained more than 20 seconds from being saved from calorie crash? If the rule is supposed to serve a purpose, the penalty shouldn't be set at a level that encourages strategizing. Froome is on the radio discussing it beforehand, I think. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth, as we say.

User avatar
prendrefeu
Posts: 8611
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California
Contact:

by prendrefeu

Theoretically, if he did Bonk (which, it looked like he was really close to bonking at the time), he would have lost several minutes. It's rare that a pro rider would bonk in a race, but it has happened in the past. This isn't the only instance in which Froome needed nutrition towards the end of a race/stage, which makes me wonder: does he just forget to eat, all drawn up in the heat of the battle? Or maybe his metabolism is super high and he has an exceptional rate of conversion to ridiculously high power outputs, so he needs to fuel more often? Or does he have poor on-the-bike nutritional habits regardless?

(No, you super passionate Froome supporters: the above statement was not intended in any way to dismiss Froome's capabilities. Relax.)

But, anyway, he did not bonk, he did fuel, he did get penalized, he probably will stand on the top podium spot in Paris, he probably will be the most dominant cyclist the world has ever seen (depending on who you ask), his performance abilities should never be questioned - it is sanctimonious!! (depending on who you ask), and the world continues to rotate on axis as it orbits our local star. The sun will continue to rise from the Easterly direction and set towards the West, today will soon be history.
Exp001 || Other projects in the works.

User avatar
Kermithimself
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm
Location: Denmark

by Kermithimself

Well, Team Sky is all about marginal gains. I have a hard time believing that he actually was close to bonking. If they are as professional as they seem, they instruct their riders to eat and drink all the time, in a certain time scheduele. Contador had cracked, Quintana and Rodriquez were of no threat to Froome. He could easily pretend to bonk, get a 20 second penalty, and seem more human. Even Rodriquez said after the stage that it looked like Froome was human.

I call PR stunt.
------------
If you dream of being famous - think of what birds do to statues.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kermithimself/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdCPaXwpeXT_LpuEF0REjqw
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gotlegscycling/

by Weenie


Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post