“Correct” sock length

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderators: robbosmans, Moderator Team

Wookski
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:51 am

by Wookski

I’m noticing more and more riders wearing socks that rise beyond mid calf- this is not a new trend but recently it has become more mainstream. Instagram accounts such as sockdoping also promote this aesthetic.

I personally think there should be at least an inch between the top of the sock and the beginning of the calf muscle.

Here’s a pic of me this morning and apologies for the lack of leg definition, I just can’t seem to grow guns :cry:
Image
Anyway, keen to hear your thoughts on “what is “correct” when it comes to socks.

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12550
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

I have zero calf muscle, but most of my socks are around 6-7 inches (15-18cm)

Please excuse my mangled unshaven leg and clown foot.
Attachments
0494B603-3EA8-4813-8889-B1F9C0F9ED06.jpeg

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Nefarious86
Moderator
Posts: 3669
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 4:57 am

by Nefarious86

Between flush to 1" under the bottom of the calf. 6-7" socks work for me.

Ridge Supply are a tad short Image
Swiftwick 7"
Image
Image
S-Works "Tall"
Image
Sako 7 work well




Image
Using Tapatalk

User avatar
Lelandjt
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:10 am

by Lelandjt

Socks are shoe liners. Why should they extend above the shoe? You guys must have epicly dorky tan lines.

Nefarious86
Moderator
Posts: 3669
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 4:57 am

by Nefarious86

Rule #7//

Tan lines should be cultivated and kept razor sharp.

Under no circumstances should one be rolling up their sleeves or shorts in an effort to somehow diminish one’s tan lines. Sleeveless jerseys are under no circumstances to be employed

Rule #27//

Shorts and socks should be like Goldilocks.

Not too long and not too short. (Disclaimer: despite Sean Yates’ horrible choice in shorts length, he is a quintessential hard man of cycling and is deeply admired by the Velominati. Whereas Armstrong’s short and sock lengths are just plain wrong.) No socks is a no-no, as are those ankle-length ones that should only be worn by female tennis players.



Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

Using Tapatalk

Wookski
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:51 am

by Wookski

Lelandjt wrote:
Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:06 am
Socks are shoe liners. Why should they extend above the shoe? You guys must have epicly dorky tan lines.
Are you a bib pisser or a female tennis player?

User avatar
wheelbuilder
Posts: 1210
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am

by wheelbuilder

meh.......I've been rocking the 2.5 inch Fignon/Eddy length since 1982. Love it. Feel like Mike Tyson.
Never cheer before you know who is winning

User avatar
Lelandjt
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:10 am

by Lelandjt

Wookski wrote:
Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:18 am
Lelandjt wrote:
Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:06 am
Socks are shoe liners. Why should they extend above the shoe? You guys must have epicly dorky tan lines.
Are you a bib pisser or a female tennis player?
Neither, I'm from new England. Since moving "out west" I've never gotten an explaination for why people this side of the Mississippi like long socks. The only defense they have is that ankleless socks or no socks at all look ghey. I spend the other half of my year "way out west" in Hawaii where tan lines get you laughed at and sock styles mimic New England.

shimmeD
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:52 pm
Location: eNZed

by shimmeD

If it's good enough for Eddy, I'll carry on short ones until I can't buy them. I do like the idea of bright socks for visibility and since longer means more visibilty I might head down that way. And on another note, as far as I'm concerned Armstrong started the long trend.
Less is more.

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12550
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

As a road cyclist, funny sock tans should be the least of your tanline worries. How many of you with low-socks wear gloves...do you wear "arm coolers" too?

I like mid-length cuffs with patterns to break up the monotony.

Besides, I don't wear socks with my running shoes most of the time so I don't have a sock tanline anyway.

User avatar
guyc
Posts: 1742
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:40 am
Location: Hampshire, England
Contact:

by guyc

Lelandjt wrote:
Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:06 am
Socks are shoe liners. Why should they extend above the shoe? You guys must have epicly dorky tan lines.
No.

Yes.

Earned on the road.

I’m not a sodding triathlete.

User avatar
ebsilon
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Denmark

by ebsilon

shimmeD wrote:If it's good enough for Eddy, I'll carry on short ones until I can't buy them. I do like the idea of bright socks for visibility and since longer means more visibilty I might head down that way. And on another note, as far as I'm concerned Armstrong started the long trend.

+1
Speed of Lite

mag
Posts: 616
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:23 pm

by mag

@Nefarious86 white socks & pink bike, pink socks & white bike... the end of our world is near! ;-)

By the way: longer socks > more material needed > higher weight > fail! :-D

User avatar
853guy
Posts: 225
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:48 pm

by 853guy

When I hoisted my leg over the top tube this morning at 8am it was 26 degrees Celcius.

By the time I hit the first incline, I had already folded my socks down to a more Merckx-friendly length.

Sorry, purists, but sometimes funtion takes precedence over form.

853guy

Wookski
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:51 am

by Wookski

In summer temperatures here can exceed 40 degrees C and I have never thought of folding down my socks :noidea:

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Post Reply