Specialized backs up their "Roubaix" trademark, not cool

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderator: Moderator Team

User avatar
swinter
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:27 am
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI

by swinter

Mr.Gib wrote:Ahh certain conditions may call for such radical measures and often certain types of regulation are prudent (particularly those that are designed to enhance fairness and competition). But that "technological knowledge" and "intellectual property" that the companies were forced to share would not have existed were not for an environment that protected those things from theft/misappropriation and created a reasonable expectation of return on R&D investment. The Japanese competitiveness and affluence of which you speak was in fact not the result of sharing but the result of a marketplace that supported the creation of the technologies in the first place.

Checkmate. Here endeth the lesson.

I'm afraid that Mr. Gib has it only part right this time.

It's true that it's an article of faith amongst economists that clear laws of property and contract are necessary for successful markets (and, therefore by extension, that intellectual property rights are necessary to successful markets). But this argument is flawed, both theoretically and empirically.

Theoretically, it is only necessary that -- as you say -- people have a reasonable expectation of return on investment. But this can occur without property and contract rules as long as there are settled cultural expectations (of various sorts), the ability to inflict reciprocal costs, or some other economic advantage. (I've written a longer article on this using basic Coasean premises.) It can certainly occur without intellectual property rights as long as the original retains niche advantages over the copy. (No Beatlemania copy is going to to detract from the value of an original Beatles performance.)

Empirically, there are multiple examples (both contemporaneous and historical) of markets that work on trust rather than law. There are also multiple examples of IP producers who maximize the value of their product by not protecting their intellectual product. Google (Android operating system) and the Grateful Dead are the prototypes.
"I can't understand why people are frightened by new ideas. I'm frightened of old ones." -- John Cage

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/phpBB ... 928#126928

wojchiech
Posts: 459
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:33 pm
Location: bay area, california

by wojchiech

swinter, you're a Deadhead aren't you? :P :beerchug:

User avatar
swinter
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:27 am
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI

by swinter

wojchiech wrote:swinter, you're a Deadhead aren't you? :P :beerchug:

oh yeah. not like back in the 70s. though I never followed them around or anything; I did see them a dozen or so times in NY, NJ, DC, CT when I was in college.

it's still the only way I can grade my papers: I put on a mini Dead marathon as I slog through the grading. it's like free anesthesia.

P.S. -- and I did meet John Perry Barlow (Weir's co-writer and a co-founder of the Electronic Freedom Foundation) at an IP conference back in the 1990s. the Grateful Dead as a prototype for open-source sharing was one of the topics.
"I can't understand why people are frightened by new ideas. I'm frightened of old ones." -- John Cage

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/phpBB ... 928#126928

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post