The WeightWeenies website was recently updated and is now fully SSL encrypted (URLs beginning with https).
Probably you have been logged-out, we're sorry for that (was unavoidable), just login again.
When there are errors occuring please first delete cookies and browser-cache - if it doesn't help or you find other problems please post here or write short mail to email@example.com
When you have problems with Tapatalk App please re-follow/re-login.
Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please
Moderator: Moderator Team
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:22 pm
There should just be a link to CyclingNews' Clinic
some of the info on there is interesting, but they seem to think nearly everyone is a doper
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 pm
What's the most lightweight form of doping out there? I figure epo and blood transfusions would add all this extra mass from the additional red blood cells, but a little T or HGH cream shouldn't add too much to the overall mass.
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:03 am
^^^ I think it's limb doping. It's rife in the disabled olympics - carbon fibre legs everywhere.
r o y g b i v
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:20 pm
- Location: New Zealand
I hear breathing harder is pretty a light weight form of doping and it's an unfair advantage if you can breath more than others
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
- Location: New York
stella-azzurra wrote: And by the way even with drugs the person that does not have the genetic disposition will still be slower than the person that has the genetic natural ability for high aerobic work. Conversely people who have the high aerobic ability and take drugs may or may not benefit from the drug because each drug has a different affect on each one of us.
Do you have any examples for that statement? (italicized and in bold)
That would be simple to deduce. For example a person that was not genetically gifted outputs 300W peak power for 10 minutes. They then take EPO and increase their performance by 15%. The usual gain is 10-15% in most cases. So a 15% increase will result in a 345W output. An athlete that is genetically predisposed will naturally output 400W - 500W for the same 10 minutes without EPO. We are not taking into account rider weight. This is just a number example.
The link below explains it better.http://www.sportsscientists.com/2007/11 ... e-who.html
also this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHU7qBZSsfk
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree
Frankie - B
- Posts: 6608
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
- Location: Drenthe, Holland
Sometimes I wish there weren't any bike races. This is one of the reasons. Each and every year we need to tell you that we don't want a doping duscussion. We already had a few and they didn't end up well either.
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'
- 2389 Replies
- 166301 Views
Last post by pastronef
Mon May 21, 2018 8:12 pm
- 8 Replies
- 1680 Views
Last post by stevod
Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:09 pm
- 11 Replies
- 2184 Views
Last post by scant
Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:32 am
- 16 Replies
- 1518 Views
Last post by AJS914
Tue Jul 25, 2017 3:24 pm