Analysis paralysis - wheels - weight or aero?
Moderator: robbosmans
Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
Hi everyone,
I’m currently building an Aethos and I'm stuck deciding on the wheels. The options are between the Lightbicycle AR25 (990g, 25mm) and the Wheelsfar Hyper (1190g, 50mm). The change would bring the projected weight from 5.6kg to around 5.4kg.
The Aethos will be my second bike, with my primary bike being a Dogma with ENVE 4.5 wheels, weighing a total of 7.4kg. Given this, would it make sense to go for the lightest possible wheels to create a noticeable difference between the two bikes? On the other hand, since I live in Sydney, Australia, where the terrain is more mixed than purely climbing-focused, maybe the 200g penalty for the deeper rims is worth it for the added aerodynamics.
Thanks in advance!!
I’m currently building an Aethos and I'm stuck deciding on the wheels. The options are between the Lightbicycle AR25 (990g, 25mm) and the Wheelsfar Hyper (1190g, 50mm). The change would bring the projected weight from 5.6kg to around 5.4kg.
The Aethos will be my second bike, with my primary bike being a Dogma with ENVE 4.5 wheels, weighing a total of 7.4kg. Given this, would it make sense to go for the lightest possible wheels to create a noticeable difference between the two bikes? On the other hand, since I live in Sydney, Australia, where the terrain is more mixed than purely climbing-focused, maybe the 200g penalty for the deeper rims is worth it for the added aerodynamics.
Thanks in advance!!
-
- Posts: 13807
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
Get the AR25s, though keep in mind their “hybrid hooks” may as well be hookless. Don’t use narrower tires than 28s, and note the max pressure rating for the rim is 70psi, not even 72.5psi.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Going fast and holding speed is fun. I would go with the 50mms.
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:26 pm
Both.
Id buy the new turbo wheels, 50mm depth, the quality is exeptional. When laced with carbon spokes they are probably below 1300g.
My ideal build would be these rims, nonplus hubs, titanium spokes. 1200g, reliable metal spokes, nothing too proprietary. And although not by any means cheap, still below 2000.
I have the ar465 rims and I can attest to the quality.
Id buy the new turbo wheels, 50mm depth, the quality is exeptional. When laced with carbon spokes they are probably below 1300g.
My ideal build would be these rims, nonplus hubs, titanium spokes. 1200g, reliable metal spokes, nothing too proprietary. And although not by any means cheap, still below 2000.
I have the ar465 rims and I can attest to the quality.
The more logical choice will be the 50mm's.mk92 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2024 12:08 pmHi everyone,
I’m currently building an Aethos and I'm stuck deciding on the wheels. The options are between the Lightbicycle AR25 (990g, 25mm) and the Wheelsfar Hyper (1190g, 50mm). The change would bring the projected weight from 5.6kg to around 5.4kg.
The Aethos will be my second bike, with my primary bike being a Dogma with ENVE 4.5 wheels, weighing a total of 7.4kg. Given this, would it make sense to go for the lightest possible wheels to create a noticeable difference between the two bikes? On the other hand, since I live in Sydney, Australia, where the terrain is more mixed than purely climbing-focused, maybe the 200g penalty for the deeper rims is worth it for the added aerodynamics.
Thanks in advance!!
200grams won't give a meaningfull difference during the climbs in speed. It will FEEL faster when you stand up or accelerate. But when you'd do a timing of your loop you won't see much difference. The 50mm's will be a bit faster (especially if there is some yaw). And it looks MUCH better (imo).
In the end also the 50mm's will not be MUCH faster, so the best answer probably is 'buy what you like the most'.
-
- Posts: 13807
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
He already has a semi-aero bike with ~50mm deep wheels. The logical choice is to avoid redundancy.
Adding 200grams to his 5.4kg bike won't make it the same as his 7.4kg aero bike.TobinHatesYou wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2024 1:07 pmHe already has a semi-aero bike with ~50mm deep wheels. The logical choice is to avoid redundancy.
-
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:33 pm
I actually agree with THY, just get the lightest low profile you can get. It's an aethos, why bother with aero?
I wouldn't want to use tubeless tho, much prefer running TPUs with clinchers.
I wouldn't want to use tubeless tho, much prefer running TPUs with clinchers.
-
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:28 am
- Location: California Silicon Valley
Yup, pretty obvious choice if you already have another faster bike. Optimize each for what they are good at.
If you only had the aethos something around 40mm would be a good bet but you already have an on meta bike. Build this one up light towards the advantage of the aethos platform. Id avoid tubulars and anything super exotic as I think those match better with rim builds.
If you only had the aethos something around 40mm would be a good bet but you already have an on meta bike. Build this one up light towards the advantage of the aethos platform. Id avoid tubulars and anything super exotic as I think those match better with rim builds.
Doesn't matter. Shallower profiles look better on Aethos.
Current bikes: '24 S-Works Tarmac SL8, '24 Specialized Allez Sprint
Disgusting list of bikes owned
Disgusting list of bikes owned
I'm in the wheelsfar train, mostly because the LR25 with CX-ray are going to be noodly. but 50mm is a bit much IMO to climb, just don't like the feeling of it.
Carbon spokes, 35/45mm deep, hooked rims, is the sweet spot for me.
If your user case is to keep some versatility for your bike that would be my choice. If your goal is to make a HC wheelset that you use only for KOM chasing and HC racing once in a while, I would go with the 25mm.
Carbon spokes, 35/45mm deep, hooked rims, is the sweet spot for me.
If your user case is to keep some versatility for your bike that would be my choice. If your goal is to make a HC wheelset that you use only for KOM chasing and HC racing once in a while, I would go with the 25mm.
Because speed is fun. I run 60mm wheels on my external cable bike. It's a little less snappy up climbs but I get way more back elsewhere. 40-50mm is good and 25mm is to far IMO.MagicShite wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2024 2:23 pmI actually agree with THY, just get the lightest low profile you can get. It's an aethos, why bother with aero?
I wouldn't want to use tubeless tho, much prefer running TPUs with clinchers.
Buy the shallow wheels and put the Enves on if you want aero.
‘22 Bianchi Oltre XR4 Disc - Fast Race
‘25 SWorks SL8 RTP - Climby Race
‘24 Specialized Crux Pro - Dirty Race
‘22 Bianchi Sprint - Practice Race
‘17 Bianchi Pista Sei Giorni - Dont Race
‘25 SWorks SL8 RTP - Climby Race
‘24 Specialized Crux Pro - Dirty Race
‘22 Bianchi Sprint - Practice Race
‘17 Bianchi Pista Sei Giorni - Dont Race
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com